skip to main content
RFC2414: Increasing TCP's Initial Window1998 RFC
Publisher:
  • RFC Editor
  • United States
Published:01 September 1998
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

This document specifies an increase in the permitted initial window for TCP from one segment to roughly 4K bytes. This document discusses the advantages and disadvantages of such a change, outlining experimental results that indicate the costs and benefits of such a change to TCP.

RFC Downloads

Cited By

  1. ACM
    Rüth J, Bormann C and Hohlfeld O Large-scale scanning of TCP's initial window Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference, (304-310)
  2. ACM
    Lau S and Trajković L Analysis of traffic data from a hybrid satellite-terrestrial network The Fourth International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness & Workshops, (1-7)
  3. Mondal A and Kuzmanovic A When TCP Friendliness Becomes Harmful Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, (152-160)
  4. Chai W and Pavlou G Cross-layer enhancement to TCP slow-start over geostationary bandwidth on demand satellite networks Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Next Generation Teletraffic and Wired/Wireless Advanced Networking, (86-98)
  5. Kuzmanovic A and Knightly E (2006). Low-rate TCP-targeted denial of service attacks and counter strategies, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 14:4, (683-696), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006.
  6. Joo C, Bahk S and Kim H Synchronizing TCP with block acknowledgement over multi-hop wireless networks Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Information Networking: advances in Data Communications and Wireless Networks, (267-275)
  7. ACM
    González-Parada E, Cano-García J and Díaz-Estrella A (2005). A new methodology for representation of TCP performance in multiconnection environments, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 35:1, (99-110), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2005.
  8. ACM
    Kuzmanovic A The power of explicit congestion notification Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, (61-72)
  9. ACM
    Kuzmanovic A (2005). The power of explicit congestion notification, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 35:4, (61-72), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005.
  10. Joo C and Bahk S Increasing TCP capacity in wireless multihop networks Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Human Society@Internet: web and Communication Technologies and Internet-Related Social Issues, (37-44)
  11. ACM
    Grieco L and Mascolo S (2004). Performance evaluation and comparison of Westwood+, New Reno, and Vegas TCP congestion control, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 34:2, (25-38), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2004.
  12. ACM
    Lu G and Li X On the correspondency between TCP acknowledgment packet and data packet Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, (259-272)
  13. ACM
    Pahdye J and Floyd S On inferring TCP behavior Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, (287-298)
  14. ACM
    Allman M Measuring end-to-end bulk transfer capacity Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurement, (139-143)
  15. ACM
    Barford P and Crovella M (2019). Critical path analysis of TCP transactions, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 31:2 supplement, (80-102), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2001.
  16. ACM
    Pahdye J and Floyd S (2019). On inferring TCP behavior, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 31:4, (287-298), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2001.
  17. ACM
    Barford P and Crovella M (2019). Critical path analysis of TCP transactions, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 30:4, (127-138), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2000.
  18. ACM
    Barford P and Crovella M Critical path analysis of TCP transactions Proceedings of the conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, (127-138)
  19. ACM
    Eggert L, Heidemann J and Touch J (2019). Effects of ensemble-TCP, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 30:1, (15-29), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2000.
  20. Wang H, Shin K, Xin H and Reeves D A Simple Refinement of Slow-Start of TCP Congestion Control Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC 2000)
  21. Metz C (2018). TCP over Satellite... The Final Frontier, IEEE Internet Computing, 3:1, (76-80), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1999.
  22. ACM
    Allman M and Paxson V On estimating end-to-end network path properties Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication, (263-274)
  23. ACM
    Allman M and Paxson V (2019). On estimating end-to-end network path properties, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29:4, (263-274), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1999.
  24. ACM
    Samaraweera N (2019). Return link optimization for internet service provision using DVB-S networks, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29:3, (4-13), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1999.
Contributors
  • International Computer Science Institute
  • International Computer Science Institute
  • Colorado State University

Recommendations