skip to main content
10.1145/3184558.3186987acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration
Free Access

Assessing the News Landscape: A Multi-Module Toolkit for Evaluating the Credibility of News

Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today, journalist, information analyst, and everyday news consumers are tasked with discerning and fact-checking the news. This task has became complex due to the ever-growing number of news sources and the mixed tactics of maliciously false sources. To mitigate these problems, we introduce the The News Landscape (NELA) Toolkit: an open source toolkit for the systematic exploration of the news landscape. NELA allows users to explore the credibility of news articles using well-studied content-based markers of reliability and bias, as well as, filter and sort through article predictions based on the user's own needs. In addition, NELA allows users to visualize the media landscape at different time slices using a variety of features computed at the source level. NELA is built with a modular, pipeline design, to allow researchers to add new tools to the toolkit with ease. Our demo is an early transition of automated news credibility research to assist human fact-checking efforts and increase the understanding of the news ecosystem as a whole.

References

  1. Abhijnan Chakraborty, Bhargavi Paranjape, Sourya Kakarla, and Niloy Ganguly. 2016. Stop clickbait: Detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media ASONAM 2016. IEEE, 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Benjamin D Horne and Sibel Adali. 2017. This Just In: Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin D Horne, Sibel Adali, and Sujoy Sikdar. 2017. Identifying the social signals that drive online discussions: A case study of Reddit communities. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David Lazer, Matthew Baum, Nir Grinberg, Lisa Friedland, Kenneth Joseph, Will Hobbs, and Carolina Mattsson. 2017. Combating fake news: An agenda for research and action. Harvard Kennedy School, Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy Vol. 2 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich KH Ecker, Colleen M Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook. 2012. Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 13, 3 (2012), 106--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. {n. d.}. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In ACL 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. E. Petty and J. T Cacioppo. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and Persuasion. New York: Springer, 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kashyap Popat, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Jannik Strötgen, and Gerhard Weikum. {n. d.}. Credibility assessment of textual claims on the web CIKM 2016. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Marta Recasens, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Dan Jurafsky. 2013. Linguistic Models for Analyzing and Detecting Biased Language. ACL (1). 1650--1659.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jingbo Shang, Jialu Liu, Meng Jiang, Xiang Ren, Clare R Voss, and Jiawei Han. 2017. Automated Phrase Mining from Massive Text Corpora. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.04457 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yla R Tausczik and James W Pennebaker. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology Vol. 29, 1 (2010), 24--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Assessing the News Landscape: A Multi-Module Toolkit for Evaluating the Credibility of News

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018
            April 2018
            2023 pages
            ISBN:9781450356404

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

            Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 April 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • demonstration

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format