ABSTRACT
Online communities can help people form productive relationships. Unfortunately, this potential is not always fulfilled: many communities fail, and designers don't have a solid understanding of why. We know community activity begets activity. The trick, however, is to inspire participation in the first place. Social theories suggest methods to spark positive community participation. We carried out a field experiment that tested two such theories. We formed discussion communities around an existing movie recommendation web site, manipulating two factors: (1) similarity-we controlled how similar group members' movie ratings were; and (2) uniqueness-we told members how their movie ratings (with respect to a discussion topic) were unique within the group. Both factors positively influenced participation. The results offer a practical success story in applying social science theory to the design of online communities.
- Butler, B. Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures. Information Systems Research 12, 4 (2001), 346--362. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cosley, D., Lam, S.K., Albert, I., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. Is Seeing Believing? How Recommender Systems Influence Users' Opinions. Proc. CHI 2003, 585--592. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cosley, D., Ludford, P., & Terveen, L. Studying the Effect of Similarity in Online Task-Focused Interactions. Proc. GROUP 2003, 321--329. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1999), 817--868.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C. To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C., et al. Networks and Places: Social Relations in the Urban Setting. New York: Free Press, 1977.Google Scholar
- Fishkin, J.S. The Voice of the People. Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- Friedman, E. & Resnick, P. The Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10, 2 (2001), 173--199.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Girgensohn, A., & Lee, A. Making Web Sites Be Places for Social Interaction. Proc. CSCW 2002, 136--145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guerin, B. Language use as social strategy: A review and an analytic framework for the social sciences. Review of General Psychology 7, 3 (2003), 251--298.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hemetsberger, A., & Pieters, R. Fostering cooperation on the Internet: social exchange processes in innovative virtual consumer communities. Proc. Association for Consumer Research (2001).Google Scholar
- Ingham, A.G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10, 4 (1974), 371--384.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jackson, R.M. Social Structure and Process in Friendship Choice. In Fischer et al.: Networks and Places. New York: Free Press, 1977, 59--78.Google Scholar
- Karau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 65, 4 (1993), 681--706.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kim, A.J. Community Building on the Web. Peachpit Press, Berkeley, CA, 2000.Google Scholar
- Kollock, P. Design Principles for Online Communities. Proc. Harvard Conf. on the Internet and Society (1996). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kraut, R.E. Applying Social Psychological Theory to the Problems of Group Work. In J. Carroll (ed): HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks. 2003, 325--356.Google Scholar
- Millen, D.R., & Patterson, J.F. Stimulating Social Engagement in a Community Network. Proc CSCW 2002, 306--313. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oliver, P.E., & Marwell, G. The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II. American Sociological Review 53, 1 (1998), 108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Parks, M., & Floyd, K. Making Friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Communication 46, 1 (1996), 80--97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Preece, J. Empathic communities: reaching out across the Web. Interactions 5, 2 (1998), 32--43. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Preece, J. Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., England, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Putnam, R. Bowling Alone. Simon & Schuster, 2000.Google Scholar
- Resnick, P., & Varian, H.R., guest editors, CACM, Special issue on Recommender Systems 40, 3 (1997). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rabin, M. Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics. American Economic Review 83 (1993), 1281--1302.Google Scholar
- Resnick, P. Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital <http://www.si.umich.edu/~presnick/papers/stk/index.html>. In J. Carroll (ed): HCI in the New Millenium. Addison-Wesley, 2002, 247--272. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarwar, B.M., Karypis, G., Konstan, J.A., & Riedl, J. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. Proc. WWW 2001, 285--295. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. Transforming Public Volunteer Work. Proc. Intl. Conf. on the Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology (2003).Google Scholar
- Van Alstyne, M. & Brynjolfsson, E. Electronic Communities: Global Village or Cyberbalkans? Proc. 17th International Conf. on Information Systems (1996).Google Scholar
- Verbrugge, L.M. The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices, Social Forces 56, 2 (1977).Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
Think different: increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarity
Recommendations
What to Tell About Me? Self-Presentation in Online Communities
This paper investigates how the type of community and personal goals affect self-presentation. In 3 online studies, we simulated the registration process in online communities, presenting either a common-bond or a common-identity community. Study 1 ...
Recommending social media content to community owners
SIGIR '14: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrievalOnline communities within the enterprise offer their leaders an easy and accessible way to attract, engage, and influence others. Our research studies the recommendation of social media content to leaders (owners) of online communities within the ...
"Welcome!": social and psychological predictors of volunteer socializers in online communities
CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative workVolunteer socializers are members of a community who voluntarily help newcomers become familiar with the popular practices and attitudes of the community. In this paper, we explore the social and psychological predictors of volunteer socializers on ...
Comments