skip to main content
10.1145/984622.984653acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Flexible power scheduling for sensor networks

Published:26 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a distributed on-demand power-management protocol for collecting data in sensor networks. The protocol aims to reduce power consumption while supporting fluctuating demand in the network and provide local routing information and synchronicity without global control. Energy savings are achieved by powering down nodes during idle times identified through dynamic scheduling. We present a real implementation on wireless sensor nodes based on a novel, two-level architecture. We evaluate our approach through measurements and simulation, and show how the protocol allows adaptive scheduling and enables a smooth trade-off between energy savings and latency. An example current measurement shows an energy savings of 83% on an intermediate node.

References

  1. K.A. Arisha, M.A. Youssef, M.F. Younis, "Energy-aware TDMA based MAC for sensor networks," IEEE IMPACCT 2002, New York City, NY, USA, May 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. G. Asada, M. Dong, T. S. Lin, F. Newberg, G. Pottie, W. J. Kaiser, H. O. Marcy, "Wireless integrated network sensors: low power systems on a chip," ESSCIRC '98. Proceedings of the 24th European Solid-State Circuits Conference, The Hague, Netherlands, September 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Atmel Corporation: AVR 8-bit RISC processor. http://www.atmel.com/atmel/products/AVR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Chen, K. Jamieson, H. Balakrishnan, and R. Morris, "Span: an energy-efficient coordination algorithm for topology maintenance in ad hoc wireless networks," MobiCom 2001, Rome Italy, July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W.S. Conner, L. Krishnamurthy, and R. Want, "Making everyday life a little easier using dense sensor networks," Proceeding of ACM Ubicomp 2001, Atlanta, GA, Oct. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Crossbow Technology Inc.: http://www.xbow.com/Products/Wireless_Sensor_networks.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Digital Sun, Inc.: http://digitalsun.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. L. Doherty, B.A. Warneke, B.E. Boser, K.S.J. Pister, "Energy and Performance Considerations for Smart Dust," International Journal of Parallel Distributed Systems and Networks, Volume 4, Number 3, 2001, pp. 121--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Elson, L. Girod and D. Estrin, "Fine-grained network time synchronization using reference broadcasts," OSDI 2002, Boston, MA, USA, December 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Gay, P. Levis, R. von Behren, M. Welsh, E. Brewer, and C. Culler, "The nesC Language: A Holistic Approach to Networked Embedded Systems," Programming Language Design and Implementation, San Diego, CA, USA, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Z. Haas, J. Halpern, and L. Li, "Gossip-based ad-hoc routing," IEEE INFOCOM 2002, New York, NY, USA, June 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Hill, P. Bounadonna, and D. Culler, "Active Message Communication for Tiny Network Sensors," http://webs.cs.berkeley.edu/tos/media.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. Culler, and K.S.J. Pister, "System architecture directions for networked sensors," ASPLOS 2000, Cambridge, MA, USA, November 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J.M. Kahn, R.H. Katz, and K.S.J. Pister, "Next century challenges: mobile networking for Smart Dust," MobiCom 1999, Seattle, WA, USA, August 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Karp and H.T. Kung, "GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for wireless networks," MobiCom 2000, Boston, MA, USA, August 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S.R. Madden, M.J. Franklin, J.M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong, "TAG: a tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks," 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Boston, MA, USA, December 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, J. Anderson, "Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring," WSNA 2002, Atlanta, GA, USA, September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W. Mangione-Smith and P.S. Ghang, "A low power medium access control protocol for portable multi-media systems," 3rd International Workshop on Mobile MultiMedia Communications, September 25-27, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. G.J. Pottie, W.J. Kaiser, "Wireless Integrated Network Sensors," Communications of the ACM, vol. 4, no. 5, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C.S. Raghavendra and S. Singh, "PAMAS - Power aware multi-access protocol with signaling for ad hoc networks," ACM Communications Review, vol. 28, no. 33, July 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. V. Raghunathan, C. Schurgers, S. Park, and M.B. Srivastava, "Energy-aware wireless microsensor networks," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 19, no. 2, March 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. RF Monolithics: http://www.rfm.com/products/data/tr1000.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. E. M. Royer and C-K. Toh. "A review of current routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks," IEEE Personal Communications, April 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sensicast Systems: http://www.sensicast.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Sohrabi, J. Gao, V. Ailawadhi, and G.J. Pottie, "Protocols for self-organization of a wireless sensor network," IEEE Personal Communications, October 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. K. Sohrabi and G.J. Pottie, "Performance of a novel self-organization for wireless ad-hoc sensor networks," IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 1999, Houston, TX, May 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Stemm and R. Katz, "Measuring and reducing energy consumption of network interfaces in hand-held devices," IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 8, pp. 1125--1131, August 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. A. Woo and D. Culler, "A transmission control scheme for media access in sensor networks," in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Rome, Italy, July 2001, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Y. Xu, J. Heidemann, D. Estrin, "Geography-informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing," MobiCom 2001, Rome, Italy, July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, D. Estrin, "An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks," IEEE INFOCOM 2002, New York City, NY, USA, June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Y. Yu, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. "Geographical and Energy Aware Routing: a recursive data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks," UCLA Computer Science Department Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR-01-0023, May 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Flexible power scheduling for sensor networks

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    IPSN '04: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks
                    April 2004
                    464 pages
                    ISBN:1581138466
                    DOI:10.1145/984622

                    Copyright © 2004 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 26 April 2004

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • Article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader