skip to main content
10.3115/981175.981176dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Temporal ontology in natural language

Published:06 July 1987Publication History

ABSTRACT

A semantics of linguistic categories like tense, aspect, and certain temporal adverbials, and a theory of their use in defining the temporal relations of events, both require a more complex structure on the domain underlying the meaning representations than is commonly assumed. The paper proposes an ontology based on such notions as causation and consequence, rather than on purely temporal primitives. We claim that any manageable logic or other formal system for natural language temporal descriptions will have to embody such an ontology, as will any usable temporal database for knowledge about events which is to be interrogated using natural language.

References

  1. Allen, J., (1984). Towards a general theory of action and time, Artificial Intelligence, 23, pp. 123--154 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dowty, D. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dowty, D. (1986). The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 37--62Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hinrichs, E. (1986) Temporal anaphora in discourses of English. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 63--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kowalski, R. & M. Sergot (1986). A logic-based calculus of events. In New Generation Computing 4, 67--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Isard, S. D. (1975). Changing the context. In E. Keenan, (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, London, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lansky, A. (1986). A representation of parallel activity based on events, structure and causality. In Workshop on Planning and Reasoning about Auction, Timberline Lodge, Mount Hood, Oregon, 1986, 50--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lansky, A. & S. Owicki (1983). GEM: a tool for concurrency specification and verification. In Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, August 1983, 198-212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. McCarthy, J. & P. J. Hayes (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer & D. Michie (eds.) Machine Intelligence, Volume 4, 463--502. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. McDermott, D. (1982). A temporal logic for reasoning about processes and plans. In Cognitive Science, 6, 101--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Moens, M. & M. Steedman (1986). Temporal Information and Natural Language Processing. Edinburgh Research Papers in Cognitive Science, II, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Moens, M. (forthcoming). Tense, Aspect and Temporal Reference. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Partee, Barbara H. (1984). Nominal and temporal anaphora, Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, pp. 243--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Passonneau, Rebecca J. (1987). Situations and intervals, paper to the 25th Annual Conference of the ACL, Stanford, July 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York, Free Press, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Schuster, E. (1986). Towards a computational model of anaphora in discourse: reference to events and actions. Tech. Report CIS-MS-86-34, CIS, Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, C. (1983). A theory of aspectual choice, Language, 59, pp. 479-501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Steedman, M. (1982). Reference to past time. In Speech, Place and Action, R. Jarvella & W. Klein (eds.), 125--157. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Vendler, Z. (1967). Verbs and times. In Linguistics in Philosophy, Z. Vendler, 97--121. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Webber, B. (1987). The interpretation of tense in discourse. Paper to the 25th Annual Conference of the ACL, Stanford, July 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Temporal ontology in natural language

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        ACL '87: Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
        July 1987
        260 pages

        Publisher

        Association for Computational Linguistics

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 July 1987

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate85of443submissions,19%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader