skip to main content
10.5555/979968.979983dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-ceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

What drives curriculum change?

Published:01 January 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

While promotional literature about computer science programs may claim that curricula are determined by the needs of the students and by international best practice, the reality is often different. In this paper we reflect on the factors underlying curriculum change in computer science departments and schools, from institutional requirements and financial pressures to purely academic considerations. We have used these reflections as the basis of an investigation of curriculum management practices at institutions in Australasia, via a survey instrument sent to a range of colleagues. Our findings from the survey are consistent with our own experiences, namely, that curriculum change is driven or inhibited by factors such as vocal individuals and practical constraints rather than higher academic motives.

References

  1. Becher, T. & Barnett, R. (1999), The reshaping of the academic curriculum in the United Kingdom, in C. Gellert, ed., 'Innovation and Adaptation in Higher Education', Jessica Kingsley Publ., 116 Pentonville Road, London N1 9JB, England, chapter 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bocock, J. (1994), Curriculum change and professional identity: The role of the university lecturer, in J. Bocock & D. Watson, eds, 'Managing the University Curriculum: Making Common Cause', Open University Press, pp. 116--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ewell, P. T. (1997), 'Organizing for learning: A new imperative', AAHE Bulletin50(4), 3--6. http://aahebulletin.com/public/archive/ewell.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Froyd, J., Penberthy, D. & Watson, K. (2000), Good educational experiments are not necessarily good change processes, in 'Proc. Thirtieth ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf.', Vol. 2, Kansas City, MO, pp. F1G1-6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Goldweber, M., Impagliazzo, J., Bogoiavlenski, I., Clear, A., Davies, G., Flack, H., Myers, J. & Rasala, R. (1997), Historical perspectives on the computing curriculum, in 'Working Group Reports and Supplementary Proceedings of ITiCSE'97', ACM Press, pp. 94--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Henkel, M. & Kogan, M. (1999), Changes in curriculum and institutional structures, in C. Gellert, ed., 'Innovation and Adaptation in Higher Education', Jessica Kingsley Publ., 116 Pentonville Road, London N1 9JB, England, chapter 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Huba, M. E. & Freed, J. E. (2000), Learner-Centred Assessment on College Compuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning, Allyn & Bacon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Irimia, A. (2001), 'Enhancing the introductory computer science curriculum: C++ or Java?', The Journal of Computing in Small Colleges17(2), 159--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Joint ACM/IEEE Task Force on Computing Curricula (2001), 'Computing curricula 2001', Journal on Educational Resources in Computing1(3es).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, E. A. (2002), 'Transforming the curriculum: Preparing students for a changing world', ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report29(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, R. C. (2003), 'Employers seek well-rounded engineering grads'. International Engineering Education Digest, 26 May 2003. http://www.worldexpertise.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lachiver, G. & Tardif, J. (2002), Fostering and managing curriculum change and innovation, in 'Proc. Thirty-Second ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf.', Vol. 2, Boston, MA, pp. F2F7--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Merton, P., Clark, C., Richardson, J. & Froyd, J. (2001), Engineering curricular change across the foundation coalition: Potential lessons from qualitative research, in 'Proc. Thirty-First ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf.', Vol. 3, Reno, NV, pp. F4B15--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn, Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pham, B. (1996), The changing curriculum of computing and information technology in Australia, in 'Proc. Second Australasian Conf. Computer Science Education', ACM Press, pp. 149--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tucker, A. B. (1996), 'Strategic directions in computer science education', ACM Computing Surveys28(4), 836--845. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Watson, D. (1994), Living with ambiguity: Some dilemmas of academic leadership, in J. Bocock & D. Watson, eds, 'Managing the University Curriculum: Making Common Cause', Open University Press, pp. 77--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. What drives curriculum change?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        ACE '04: Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 30
        January 2004
        325 pages
        • Editors:
        • Raymond Lister,
        • Alison Young

        Publisher

        Australian Computer Society, Inc.

        Australia

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 January 2004

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate161of359submissions,45%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader