skip to main content
article

DateLens: A fisheye calendar interface for PDAs

Published:01 March 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Calendar applications for small handheld devices are growing in popularity. This led us to develop DateLens, a novel calendar interface for PDAs designed to support complex tasks. It uses a fisheye representation coupled with compact overviews to give the big picture in a small space. The interface also gives users control over the visible time period, as well as supporting integrated search to discover patterns and outliers. Designed with device scalability in mind, DateLens currently runs on desktop computers as well as PDAs. Two user studies were conducted to examine the viability of DateLens as a replacement for traditional calendar visualizations. In the first study, non-PDA users performed complex tasks significantly faster with DateLens than with the Microsoft Pocket PC 2002TM calendar (using a PDA emulator). In addition, they rated DateLens as being easier to use than the default calendar application for a majority of the tasks. In the second study, the participants were expert Pocket PC users and the software was run on their own devices. Again, DateLens performed significantly faster for the complex tasks, and there were satisfaction differences favoring each calendar for different kinds of tasks. From these studies, it is clear that DateLens is superior for more complex tasks such as those associated with longer time periods. For daily event tracking, users familiar with the default Pocket PC calendar strongly preferred its daily view and behaviors.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Baeza-Yates, R. and Ribeiro-Neto, B. 1999. Modern Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bederson, B. B. 2000. Fisheye Menus. UIST 2000, ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, CHI Letters 2, 2, 217--225. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bederson, B. B. and Boltman, A. 1999. Does Animation Help Users Build Mental Maps of Spatial Information? In Proceedings of Information Visualization Symposium (InfoVis 99) New York: IEEE, 28--35. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bederson, B. B., Clamage, A., Czerwinski, M. P., and Robertson, G. G. 2003. A Fisheye Calendar Interface for PDAs: Providing Overviews for Small Displays. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003). ACM Press, 618--619. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bederson, B. B., Meyer, J., and GOOD, L. 2000. Jazz: An Extensible Zoomable User Interface Graphics Toolkit in Java. UIST 2000, ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, CHI Letters 2, 2, 171--180. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Björk, S., Holmquist, L. E., Ljungstrand, P., and Redström, J. 2000. PowerView: Structured Access to Integrated Information on Small Screens. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2000). ACM Press, 265--266. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Björk, S., Holmquist, L. E., Redström, J., Bretan, I., Danielsson, R., Karlgren, J., and Franz&eaqute;n, K. 1999. WEST: A Web Browser for Small Terminals. UIST 99, ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, CHI Letters 1, 1, 187--196. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Furnas, G. W. 1986. Generalized Fisheye Views. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 86). ACM Press, 16--23. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Furnas, G. W. 1991. The Fisheye Calendar System. (Report No. TM-ARH-020558). Bellcore, Morristown, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hill, W. and Hollan, J. 1994. History-Enriched Digital Objects: Prototypes and Policy Issues. The Information Society 10, 2, 139--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Inxight. 2003. http://www.inxight.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lamping, J., Rao, R., and Pirolli, P. 1995. A Focus+Context Technique Based on Hyperbolic Geometry for Visualizing Large Hierarchies. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 95). ACM Press, 401--408. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, J. R. 1995. IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instruction for Use. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Inter 7, 1, 57--78. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mackinlay, J. D., Robertson, G. G., and Deline, R. 1994. Developing Calendar Visualizers for the Information Visualizer. In Proceedings of User Interface and Software Technology (UIST 94). ACM Press, 109--118. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Plaisant, C., and Shneiderman, B. 1992. Scheduling Home Control Devices: Design Issues and Usability Evaluation of Four Touchscreen Interfaces. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 36, 375--393. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rao, R. and Card, S. K. 1994. The Table Lens: Merging Graphical and Symbolic Representations in an Interactive Focus+Context Visualization for Tabular Information. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 94). ACM Press, 318--322. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sarkar, M., and Brown, M. H. 1992. Graphical Fisheye Views of Graphs. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 92). ACM Press, 83--91. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Schaffer, D., Zuo, Z., Bartram, L., Dill, J., Dubs, S., Greenberg, S., and Roseman, M. 1997. Comparing Fisheye and Full-Zoom Techniques for Navigation of Hierarchically Clustered Networks. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI 97). Canadian Information Processing Society, 87--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Spence, R. and Apperley, M. 1982. Data Base Navigation: an Office Environment for the Professional. Behaviour & Information Technology 1, 1, 43--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. DateLens: A fisheye calendar interface for PDAs

            Recommendations

            Reviews

            Hector A. Villa-Martinez

            A calendar program for Pocket PC-compatible personal digital assistants (PDAs) is described in this paper. The design of programs for these devices presents many problems, due to their limited screen space. The authors address this problem using a fisheye distortion technique that gives more space to the current date, less to the rest of the week, and still less to the rest of the month. To further enhance the user experience, DateLens has four visualization modes and integrated search. The paper is organized as follows: section 1 is the introduction. In section 2, there is a description of the program’s features. Sections 3 and 4 present two studies comparing DateLens with the Pocket PC’s own built-in calendar. The first study was done using novice users, while the second was done with Pocket PC experts. The authors conclude that DateLens was superior for complex tasks, but, for easy tasks, the experts preferred the built-in calendar. The paper is very well written; it includes many figures showing the program interface. In my opinion, the main contribution of the paper is that the authors prove that fisheye interfaces are suitable for small screen devices. Online Computing Reviews Service

            Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

            Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader