Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: the role of competition

ABSTRACT

The tremendous and still growing popularity of computer and video games has inspired Communication Researchers and Media Psychologists to investigate the factors of the enjoyment experienced by the players. Apparently, the games' interactivity allows for a continuous stream of challenging and competitive situations that have to be resolved by the players. Competition is therefore regarded a key element of the explanation of players' entertainment experience. Subsequent to a theoretical explication, empirical evidence for the role of competition in the playing process and the impact of competitiveness for selective exposure to computer games is reported from a field experiment (N = 349) and an online survey study (N = 795).

References

1. Interactive Digital Software Association (2001). Quick facts about video game consoles and software (Online). Retrieved from http://www.idsa.com/pressroom.html.
2. Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333--369.
3. Vorderer, P. (2000). Interactive entertainment and beyond. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 21--36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Williams, R. B. & Clippinger, C. A. (2002). Aggression, competition and computer games: Computer and human opponents. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 495--506.
5. Klimmt, C. & Vorderer, P. (2000, July). Disclosing the secret behind computer games. Presentation at the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature(IGEL), 31.07. - 04.08. 2000, Toronto.
6. Klimmt, C. (2001). Computer-Spiel: Interaktive Unterhaltungsangebote als Synthese aus Medium und Spielzeug {Computer-Games: Understanding interactive entertainment as combination of media and toys}. Zeitschrift für Medienspychologie {The Journal of Media Psychology}, 13(1), 22--32.
7. Zillmann, D. (1996). Sequential dependencies in emotional experience and behavior. In R. D. Kavanaugh, B. Zimmerberg, & S. Fein (Eds.), Emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 243--272). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Grodal, T. (2000). Video games and the pleasures of control. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 197--212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Moon, Y., & Nass, C. (1996). How "Real" are Computer Personalities? Psychological Responses to Personality Types in Human-Computer Interaction. Communication Research, 23(6), 651--674.
10. Ho-Ching, W., Inkpen, K. M. & Mason, K. (2000). Playing Together: a Taxonomy of Multiplayer Video Games. Extended Abstract and Poster presented at ASI 2000 (Vancouver, BC), GI 2000 (Montreal QC).
11. Gilbert, D. T., Giesler, B. R. & Morris, K. A. (1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 227--236.
12. Tesser, A. (1988). Towards a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 21. Academic Press: San Diego.
13. Colwell, J., Grady, C. & Rhaiti, S. (1995). Computer Games, Self-Esteem and Gratification of Needs in Adolescents, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5 (3), pp. 195--206.
14. Kanning, U. P. (1997). Selbstwertdienliches Verhalten und soziale Konflikte {Self-esteem, behaviour, and social conflicts}. Münster: Waxmann.
15. Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management: Using entertainment to full advantage. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, E. T. Higgins (Hrsg.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (S. 147--171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. McClintock, C. G. (1972). Social motivation - a set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17, 438--454.
17. Lerch, H. J. & Rüübensal, M. (1983). Eine Analyse des Zusammenhangs zwischen Schulleistungen und dem Wetteifermotive {An analysis of the relationship between school achievement and the motivation to compete}. Psychologische Beiträge, 25(3--4), 521--531.
18. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
19. Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35--37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
20. Messick, D. M. & Clintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1--25.
21. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126--141.
22. Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., de Bruin, E. M. N. & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of Prosocial, Individualistic, and Competitive Orientations: Theory and Preliminary Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 733--756.
23. Gill, D. L. & Deeter, T. E. (1988). Development of the Sport Orientation Questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 191--202.
24. Vorderer, P. (2001). It's all entertainment, sure. But what exactly is entertainment? Communication research, media psychology, and the explanation of entertainment experiences. Poetics, 29, 247--261.
25. Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The Ambiguity of Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Computers in other domains

    • Personal computers and PC applications

      • Computer games

• Human-centered computing

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Multimedia information systems

• Software and its engineering

  • Software organization and properties

    • Contextual software domains

      • Virtual worlds software

        • Interactive games