skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

Making a Case for Efficient Supercomputing: It is time for the computing community to use alternative metrics for evaluating performance.

Published:01 October 2003Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A supercomputer evokes images of “big iron“ and speed; it is the Formula 1 racecar of computing. As we venture forth into the new millennium, however, I argue that efficiency, reliability, and availability will become the dominant issues by the end of this decade, not only for supercomputing, but also for computing in general.

References

  1. 1. Moore, G. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits, Electronics 38, 8 (April 1965).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2. When calculating the price/performance ratio, another metric that is sometimes used in conjunction with the performance metric, price is defined to be the cost of acquisition only and does not account for the cost of operation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3. Bell, G. and Gray, J. What's next in high-performance computing? Communications of the ACM, 45, 2 (Feb. 2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4. Sterling, T., Becker, D. Savarese, D., Dorband, J. Ranawake, U., and Packer, C. Beowulf: A parallel workstation for scientific computation, Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing (August 1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5. Feng, W., Warren, M., and Weigle, E. The bladed Beowulf: A cost-effective alternative to traditional Beowulfs, Proceedings of IEEE Cluster 2002 (Sept. 2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6. Warren, M., Weigle, E., and Feng, W. High-density computing: A 240-processor Beowulf in one cubic meter, Proceedings of Supercomputing 2002 (Nov. 2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7. Darling, A., Carey, L., Feng, W. The design, implementation, and evaluation of mpiBLAST, Best Paper: Applications Track, Proceedings of ClusterWorld Conference & Expo (June 2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8. Karp, A. Speeding up n-body calculations on machines lacking a hardware square root, Scientific Programming, 1, 2 (1992).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9. The performance of ASCI Q is extrapolated from the measured performance on a smaller version of the machine with the same architecture. The extrapolation is optimistic; actual performance will likely be somewhat smaller. The power and space numbers for Avalon and Green Destiny are actual measurements, whereas the power and space numbers for the ASCI machines are based on personal communications with system administrators and quoted numbers from the World Wide Web.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10. LANL researchers outfit the "Toyota Camry" of supercomputing for bioinformatics tasks, BioInform/ GenomeWeb (Feb. 3, 2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11. Warren, M., Germann, T., Lomdahl, P., Beazley, D., and Salmon, J. Avalon: An Alpha/Linux cluster achieves 10 Gflops for $150K, Proceedings of Supercomputing 1998 (SC'98) (Nov. 1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12. If Green Destiny+ had been specified in a full configuration--that is, 1.125 GB of memory per node and 160 GB of disk per node--the memory density and disk density would have increased by an order of magnitude to 187,500 MB per square foot and 6,400 GB per square foot, respectively. These numbers will have tremendous implications to Web-server farms and search-engine farms like Yahoo and Google.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13. LINPACK, the benchmark used to rank supercomputers in the Top 500 Supercomputer List (http: //www.top500.org), was chosen because it is the only common benchmark result that we have that has been run across the two different machines--Green Destiny and Japanese Earth Simulator.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14. We note again that if Green Destiny+ had been specified in a full configuration--1.125 GB of memory per node and 160 GB of disk per node--the memory density and disk density would have increased by an order of magnitude to 187,500 MB per square foot and 6,400 GB per square foot, respectively.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15. The Japanese Earth Simulator actually occupies two floors, each 50 meters by 60 meters (or 35,145 square feet) in dimension. Thus, its footprint is effectively 2* 35,145 = 70,290 square feet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16. Bell, Gordon. Letter to Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17. Lakhman, K. Craig Venter goes shopping for bioinformatics to fill his new sequencing center, GenomeWeb, Oct. 16, 2002; http://www.genomeweb.com/articles/ view-article.asp?Article=2002101693617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Making a Case for Efficient Supercomputing: It is time for the computing community to use alternative metrics for evaluating performance.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image Queue
                Queue  Volume 1, Issue 7
                Power Management
                10-01-2003
                84 pages
                ISSN:1542-7730
                EISSN:1542-7749
                DOI:10.1145/957717
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Copyright © 2003 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 October 2003

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
                • Popular
                • Pre-selected

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format .

              View HTML Format