skip to main content
10.1145/871506.871624acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesislpedConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An environmental energy harvesting framework for sensor networks

Published:25 August 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Energy constrained systems such as sensor networks can increase their usable lifetimes by extracting energy from their environment. However, environmental energy will typically not be spread homogeneously over the spread of the network. We argue that significant improvements in usable system lifetime can be achieved if the task allocation is aligned with the spatio-temporal characteristics of energy availability. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been addressed before. We present a distributed framework for the sensor network to adaptively learn its energy environment and give localized algorithms to use this information for task sharing among nodes. Our framework allows the system to exploit its energy resources more efficiently, thus increasing its lifetime. These gains are in addition to those from utilizing sleep modes and residual energy based scheduling mechanisms. Performance studies for an experimental energy environment show up to 200% improvement in lifetime.

References

  1. Panasonic solar cells technical handbook. http://www.solarbotics.net/library/datasheets/sunceram.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Bertsekas and R. Gallagher. Data Networks. Prentice Hall, 2nd edition, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Estrin, R. Govindan, and J. Heidemann. Embedding the internet: introduction. Communications of the ACM, 43(5):38--41, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. I. Gupta, R. van Renesse, and K. P. Birman. Scalable fault-tolerant aggregation in large process groups. In Int'l Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 01), Goteborg, Sweden, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Haykin. Adaptive filter theory. Prentice Hall, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. James San Jacinto Mountains Reserve. http://www.jamesreserve.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Kalpakis, K. Dasgupta, and P. Namjoshi. Efficient algorithms for maximum lifetime data gathering and aggregation in wireless sensor networks. Technical Report UMBC-TR-02-13, Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering,University of Maryland, Baltimore County, August 2002. Accepted for publication in Computer Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. R. Madden, R. Szewczyk, M. J. Franklin, and D. Culler. Supporting aggregate queries over ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. In Proc. Workshop on Mobile Computing and Systems Applications, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Melhuish. The ecobot project. www.ias.uwe.ac.uk/energy_autonomy/EcoBot_web_page.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Min, M. Bhardwaj, S. Cho, A. Sinha, E. Shih, A. Wang, and A. Chandrakasan. An architecture for a power-aware distributed microsensor node. In IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (SiPS '00), October 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. A. F. Mini, B. Nath, and A. A. F. Loureiro. A probabilistic approach to predict the energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. In IV Workshop de Comunicaçĕo sem Fio e Computaçĕo Móvel, Sĕo Paulo, Brazil, October 23-25 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mica wireless measurement system. Datasheet, Crossbow Technology Inc. http://www.xbow.com/Products/Product_pdf_files/Wireless_pdf/MICA.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. M.Rabaey, M. J. Ammer, J. L. da Silva Jr., D. Patel, and S. Roundy. Picoradio supports ad hoc ultra-low power wireless networking. IEEE Computer, pages 42--48, July 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Pister. Smart dust: Autonomous sensing and communication in a cubic millimeter. http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/˜pister/SmartDust/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. V. Raghunathan, C. Schurgers, S. Park, and M. Srivastava. Energy aware wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(2):40--50, March 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Rahimi, H. Shah, G. S. Sukhatme, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. Studying the feasibility of energy harvesting in a mobile sensor network. In IEEE Int'l Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R. Ramanathan and R. Hain. Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment. In INFOCOM (2), pages 404--413, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Schurgers, V. Tsiatsis, S. Ganeriwal, and M. Srivastava. Optimizing sensor networks in the energy-density-latency design space. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (TMC), pages 70-- 80, January-March 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. C. Shah and J. M. Rabaey. Energy aware routing for low energy ad hoc sensor networks. In Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), volume 1, pages 350--355, Orlando, FL, March, 17-21 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. Singh, M. Woo, and C. S. Raghavendra. Power-aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proc. Fourth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom), pages 181--190, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Srivastava, R. Muntz, and M. Potkonjak. Smart kindergarten: sensor-based wireless networks for smart developmental problem-solving enviroments. In Proc. ACM MobiCom, July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. P. Stoica and R. Moses. Introduction to Spectral Analysis. Prentice Hall, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D. Tennenhouse. Proactive computing. Communications of the ACM, 43(5):43--50, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. Xu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. Geography-informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing. In Proc. ACM Mobicom, pages 70--84. ACM Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Younis, M. Youssef, and K. Arisha. Energy-aware routing in cluster-based sensor networks. In Proc. 10th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS'02), Fort Worth, Texas, October 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Zhao, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Residual energy scans for monitoring wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC'02), volume 1, pages 356--362, Orange County Convention Center, Orlando, FL, USA, 17-21 March 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An environmental energy harvesting framework for sensor networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ISLPED '03: Proceedings of the 2003 international symposium on Low power electronics and design
          August 2003
          502 pages
          ISBN:158113682X
          DOI:10.1145/871506

          Copyright © 2003 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 August 2003

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          ISLPED '03 Paper Acceptance Rate90of221submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,159submissions,34%

          Upcoming Conference

          ISLPED '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader