skip to main content
10.1145/860575.860615acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Self-organising impact boundaries in ageless aerospace vehicles

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 July 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Self-monitoring, self-repairing aerospace vehicles require modular, flexible and adaptive sensing and communication networks. In general, a modular (multi-cellular) sensing and communication network is expected to detect and react to impact location, energy and damage over a wide range of impacts. It is critical that global response emerges as a result of interactions involving transfer of information embedded locally, avoiding single points-of-failure. This work presents mechanisms ensuring self-organisation of autonomous cells into robust and continuously connected impact boundaries. The spatiotemporal stability is demonstrated for a variety of cell shapes in a dynamic environment with varying energy dissipation and damage probability models.

References

  1. David Abbott, Briony Doyle, John Dunlop, Tony Farmer, Mark Hedley, Jan Herrmann, Geoff James, Mark Johnson, Bhautik Joshi, Geoff Poulton, Don Price, Mikhail Prokopenko, Torsten Reda, David Rees, Andrew Scott, Philip Valencia, Damon Ward, and John Winter. Development and Evaluation of Sensor Concepts for Ageless Aerospace Vehicles. Development of Concepts for an Intelligent Sensing System. NASA technical report NASA/CR-2002-211773, Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Daryl W. Bradley, Andrew M. Tyrrell. Immunotronics: Novel Finite-State-Machine Architectures With Built-In Self-Test Using Self-Nonself Differentiation. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computing, Vol. 6., No. 3., June 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Aaron R Dinner, Andrej Sali, and Martin Karplus. The folding mechanism of larger model proteins: role of native structure. In the Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 8356--8361, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mark Foreman, Mikhail Prokopenko, Peter Wang. Phase Transitions in Self-organising Sensor Networks. Submitted to the 7th European Conference on Artificial Life, ECAL-03, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eric Mjolsness and Ann Tavormina. The Synergy of biology, intelligent systems, and space exploration. In IEEE Intelligent Systems - AI in Space, 3/4 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Radhika Nagpal. Programmable self-assembly using biologically-inspired multiagent control. In the Proc. of the 1st Int'l Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Italy, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Konstantine C Prevas, Cem Ünsal, Mehmet Ö Efe, and Pradeep K Khosla. A Hierarchical Motion Planning Strategy for a Uniform Self-Reconfigurable Modular Robotic System. In the Proceedings of IEEE Int'l Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mikhail Prokopenko, Peter Wang and Thomas Howard. Cyberoos'2001: 'Deep Behaviour Projection' Agent Architecture. In RoboCup-2001: Robot Soccer World Cup V, Springer, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mikhail Prokopenko and Peter Wang. Relating the Entropy of Joint Beliefs to Multi-Agent Coordination. In the Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on RoboCup, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andrej Sali, Eugene Shahknovich, and Martin Karplus. How does a protein fold. Nature, 369, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cem Ünsal and John S Bay. Spatial Self-Organization in Large Populations of Mobile Robots. In the Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Columbus, Ohio, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Luba Vikhanski. In Search of the Lost Cord: Solving the Mystery of Spinal Cord Regeneration. JHP, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Self-organising impact boundaries in ageless aerospace vehicles

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AAMAS '03: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
      July 2003
      1200 pages
      ISBN:1581136838
      DOI:10.1145/860575

      Copyright © 2003 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 July 2003

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader