skip to main content
10.5555/820086.820088dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesauicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Work at hand: an exploration of gesture in the context of work and everyday life to inform the design of gestural input devices

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 February 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

This research explores gestures used in the context of activities in the workplace and in everyday life in order to understand requirements and devise concepts for the design of gestural information appliances. A collaborative method of video interaction analysis devised to suit design explorations, the Video Card Game, was used to capture and analyse how gesture is used in the context of six different domains: the dentist's office; PDA and mobile phone use; the experimental biologist's laboratory; a city ferry service; a video cassette player repair shop; and a factory flowmeter assembly station. Findings are presented in the form of gestural themes, derived from the tradition of qualitative analysis but bearing some similarity to Alexandrian patterns. Implications for the design of gestural devices are discussed.

References

  1. ALEXANDER, C., ISHIKAWA, S., SILVERSTEIN, M., JACOBSON, M., FIKSDAHL-KING, I. and ANGEL, S. (1977) A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction, New York, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BATES, E., (1994) Modularity, domain specificity and the development of language. In Evolution and Neurology of Language. Discussions in Neuroscience10(1-2) 136-149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BOUISSAC, P. (accessed 2002) Describing gestures: boundaries, scales and perspectives, Virtual Symposium on the Multimodality of Human Communication: Theories, Problems and Applications, University of Toronto, May 3-5 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. BRERETON, M. (2001) Drawing Lessons in the Design of Tangible Media from a Study of Interactions with Mechanical Products, Proceedings of the Australian User Interface Conference, pp 92-100, 24th Australasian Computer Science Conference ACSC 2001 Held: Gold Coast, Australia, Jan 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. BRERETON, M.F. and MCGARRY, B. (2000) An Observational Study of How Objects Support Engineering Design Thinking and Communication: Implications for the design of tangible media. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Computer Human Interaction, CHI 2000, pp 217-224, The Hague April 1-6th 2000. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. BUUR, J., BINDER, T. and BRANDT, E. (2000), Taking Video beyond Hard Data in User Centered Design. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Nov. 00. New YorkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. BUUR, J. and SOENDERGAARD, A. (2000) Video Card Game: An augmented environment for User Centred Design discussions. In Designing Augmented Reality Systems Conference, ACM Press, Elsinore Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. CHI'95 gesture Workshop: http://wex.www.media.mit.edu/people/wex/CHI95- workshop-writeup.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. CLARK, A. (1997) Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. COUTAZ, D.J. and CROWLEY, J.L., (1995) Interpreting Human Gesture with Computer Vision. Position paper for the workshop "Gesture at the User Interface", CHI'95,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. CRABTREE, A., HEMMINGS, T. and RODDEN, T. (2002) Pattern-based support for interactive design in domestic settings. Proc. Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 265-27, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. ERICKSON, T (2000) Lingua Francas for design: sacred places and pattern languages, In Designing interactive systems Conference. New York Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. JAKOBSON, R (1990) On Language. eds WAUGH L.R and MONVILLE-BURSTON M. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. JORDAN, B. and HENDERSON, A. (1994). Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. The journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (1)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. KEATES S, and PERRICOS C (1996) Gesture as a means of computer access. Communication Matters. 10(1)17-19Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. KRAUSS, R.M., CHEN, Y. and CHAWLA, P. (1996) Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication: What do conversational hand gestures tell us? In Advances in experimental social psychology 389-450. M. Zanna (ed.) Tampa: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. KRAUSS, R.M., DUSHAY, R., CHEN, Y., and RAUSCHER, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gestures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology31, 533-552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. KRAUSS, R.M., MORREL-SAMUELS, P. and COLASANTE, C. (1991). Do conversational hand gestures communicate? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61, 743-754.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. MCLUHAN, M (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. MCNEILL, D. (1992) Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought." Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. MCNEILL, D. (1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review92:350-371.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. NESPOULOUS, J.L. PERRON, P and LECOURS A.R., (1986) The Biological Foundations of Gestures: Motor and Semiotic Aspects. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, MJ,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. PELACHAUD, C. and POGGI, I. (1997) Multimodal Embodied Agents ACM 0-89791-88-6/97/05Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. RAUSCHER, F.H., KRAUSS, R.M., and CHEN, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7 (4), 226-231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. RIZZOLATTI, G. LEONARDO F and VITTORIO G (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 : 661-670Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. SPINNEY, L., (2000) BodyTalk New Scientist166(2233) 30-31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. STRAUSS, A. L., CORBIN, J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, Sage PublicationsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Work at hand: an exploration of gesture in the context of work and everyday life to inform the design of gestural input devices

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader