skip to main content
10.1145/800061.808735acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Lower bounds for algebraic computation trees

Published:01 December 1983Publication History

ABSTRACT

A topological method is given for obtaining lower bounds for the height of algebraic computation trees, and algebraic decision trees. Using this method we are able to generalize, and present in a uniform and easy way, almost all the known nonlinear lower bounds for algebraic computations. Applying the method to decision trees we extend all the apparently known lower bounds for linear decision trees to bounded degree algebraic decision trees, thus answering the open questions raised by Steele and Yao [20]. We also show how this new method can be used to establish lower bounds on the complexity of constructions with ruler and compass in plane Euclidean geometry.

References

  1. 1.W. Baur and V. Strassen, The complexity of partial derivatives. to appear (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.A. Borodin and I. Munro, Computational complexity of algebraic and numeric problems. American Elsevier, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.D. Dobkin, A nonlinear lower bound on linear search tree programs for solving knapsack problems. JCSS 13, (1976) 69-73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.D.P. Dobkin and R.J. Lipton, A lower bound of ½ n2 on linear search programs for the knapsack problem. JCSS 16, (1978) 413-417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.D.P. Dobkin and R.J. Lipton, On the complexity of computations under varying sets of primitives. JCSS 18, (1979) 86-91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6.M.L. Fredman and B. Weide, On the complexity of computing the measure of &ugr;{ai, bi}. CACM 21, (1978) 540-544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.D. Hilbert, Foundations of geometry, 1899. Edited and reprinted by Open Court, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.J.W. Jaromczyk, Lower bounds for problems defined by polynomial inequalities. Inter. FCT conference, Hungary, August 1981, F. Gecseg Ed. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 117), Springer-Verlag, 165-172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.J.W. Jaromczyk, An extension of Rabin's complete proof concept. Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 1981, J. Gruska and M. Chytill Ed. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 118), Springer-Verlag, 321-326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Lemoine, Géométrographie, 1907.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.J. Milnor, On the betti numbers of real algebraic varieties. Proc. AMS 15, (1964) 275-280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.J. Milnor, Singular points of complex hypersurfces. Princeton Univ. Press, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.M.O. Rabin, Proving simultaneous positivity of linear forms. JCSS 6, (1972) 639-650.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.M.O. Rabin, unpublished lecture notes (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.E.M. Reingold, On the optimality of some set algorithms. JACM 19, (1972) 649-659. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.A. Schmitt, On the computational power of the floor function. Info. Proc. Let. 14, (1982) 1-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17.C.P. Schnorr, An extension of Strassen's degree bound. SIAM J. Comput. 10, (1981) 371-382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.M.I. Shamos, Geometric complexity. Proc. 7th ACM STOC, Albuqueque, New Mexico, (May 1975) 224-233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.M.I. Shamos, Problems in computational geometry, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.J.M. Steele and A.C. Yao, Lower bounds for algebraic decision trees. J. Algorithms 3, (1982) 1-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21.V. Strassen, Die Berechnungskomplexität von elementarsymetrischen funktionen und von interpolationskoeffizienten. Numer. Math. 20, (1973) 238-251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.V. Strassen, The computational complexity of continued fractions. Proc. of the 1981 ACM symposium on symbolic and algebraic computation, Utah, (August 1981) 51-67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.R. Thom, Sur l'homologie des variétés algébriques réelles. Differential and Combinatorial Topology, Ed. S.S. Cairns, Princeton Univ. Press, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.A.C. Yao, On the complexity of comparison problems using linear functions. Proc. 16th STOC, Berkeley 1975, 85-89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.A.C. Yao, A lower bound to finding convex hulls. Stanford Computer Science Report STAN-CS-79-733, (1979). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.A.C. Yao and R.L. Rivest, On the polyhedral decision problem. SIAM J. Comput. 9, (1980) 343-347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Lower bounds for algebraic computation trees

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  STOC '83: Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
                  December 1983
                  487 pages

                  Copyright © 1983 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 December 1983

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

                  Upcoming Conference

                  STOC '24
                  56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
                  June 24 - 28, 2024
                  Vancouver , BC , Canada

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader