Thomas W. Malone
ABSTRACT
In this paper, I will describe my intuitions about what makes computer games fun. More detailed descriptions of the experiments and the theory on which this paper is based are given by Malone (1980a, 1980b). My primary goal here is to provide a set of heuristics or guidelines for designers of instructional computer games. I have articulated and organized common sense principles to spark the creativity of instructional designers (see Banet, 1979, for an unstructured list of similar principles). To demonstrate the usefulness of these principles, I have included several applications to actual or proposed instructional games. Throughout the paper I emphasize games with educational uses, but I focus on what makes the games fun, not on what makes them educational.
Though I will not emphasize the point in this paper, these same ideas can be applied to other educational environments and life situations. In a sense, the categories I will describe constitute a general taxonomy of intrinsic motivation—of what makes an activity fun or rewarding for its own sake rather than for the sake of some external reward (See Lepper and Greene, 1979).
I think the essential characteristics of good computer games and other intrinsically enjoyable situations can be organized into three categories: challenge, fantasy, and curiosity.
- 1.Banet, B. Computers and early learning: A new direction for High/Scope Foundation. Calculators/Computers, 1979, 3, 17.Google Scholar
- 2.Berlyne, D. E. Structure and direction in thinking. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar
- 3.Burton, R.R. & Brown, J.S. An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1979, 11, 5-24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 4.Hollan, J., McCandless, T., Prince. R., Putz, S. Sharp, J., & Williams, M. Tactical memorization software. Technical Note, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, San Diego, Calif., forthcoming (1980).Google Scholar
- 5.Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. The hidden costs of reward. Morristown, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
- 6.Malone, T. W. What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1980a.Google Scholar
- 7.Malone, T. W. What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Technical report, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, Calif., forthcoming, (1980b)Google Scholar
- 8.Moore, O. K. & Anderson, A. R. Some principles for the design of clarifying educational environments. In Goslin, D. (Ed.) Handbook of socialization theory and research, New York: Rand McNally, 1969.Google Scholar
- 9.Morozova, N.G. {The psychological conditions for the arousal and modification of interest in children in the process of reading popular scientific literature.} Izvestiia Akad. Pedag. Nauk, 1955, 73, 100-149. (cited and summarized by Berlyne, 1965.)Google Scholar
- 10.Piaget, J. The origins of intelligence in children. N.Y.: International University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- What makes things fun to learn? heuristics for designing instructional computer games
Recommendations
From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification"
MindTrek '11: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media EnvironmentsRecent years have seen a rapid proliferation of mass-market consumer software that takes inspiration from video games. Usually summarized as "gamification", this trend connects to a sizeable body of existing concepts and research in human-computer ...
Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games
CHI '82: Proceedings of the 1982 Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper, I will discuss two questions: (1) Why are computer games so captivating? and (2) How can the features that make computer games captivating be used to make other user interfaces interesting and enjoyable to use?
After briefly summarizing ...
GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games
Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in EntertainmentAlthough player enjoyment is central to computer games, there is currently no accepted model of player enjoyment in games. There are many heuristics in the literature, based on elements such as the game interface, mechanics, gameplay, and narrative. ...
Comments