skip to main content
10.1145/75246.75252acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The revised ARPANET routing metric

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 1989Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ARPANET routing metric was revised in July 1987, resulting in substantial performance improvements, especially in terms of user delay and effective network capacity. These revisions only affect the individual link costs (or metrics) on which the PSN (packet switching node) bases its routing decisions. They do not affect the SPF (“shortest path first”) algorithm employed to compute routes (installed in May 1979). The previous link metric was packet delay averaged over a ten second interval, which performed effectively under light-to-moderate traffic conditions. However, in heavily loaded networks it led to routing instabilities and wasted link and processor bandwidth.

The revised metric constitutes a move away from the strict delay metric: it acts similar to a delay-based metric under lightly loads and to a capacity-based metric under heavy loads. It will not always result in shortest-delay paths. Since the delay metric produced shortest-delay paths only under conditions of light loading, the revised metric involves giving up the guarantee of shortest-delay paths under light traffic conditions for the sake of vastly improved performance under heavy traffic conditions.

References

  1. 1.ARPANET Performance Analysis Report. Quarterly Report 11, BBN, Aug. 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.MILNET Routing Improvements: Measurements and Analysis of the $PF Metric Patch. BBN Report 6719, BBN, Feb. 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.D. P. Bertsekas. Dynamic Behavior of Shortest Path Routing Algorithms for Communication Networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-27:60- 74, Feb. 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4.E. W. Dijkstra. A Note on Two Problems in Connection with Graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1:269- 271, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.R. Gallager and D. Bertsekas. Data Networks. Prentice-Hail, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.V. Haimo, M. Gardner, I. I_x>obeek, and M. Frishkopf. Multi-Path Routing: Modeling and Simulation. BBN Report 6363, BBN, Sep. 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.A. Khanna. Short-Term Modifications to Routing and Congestion Control. BBN Report 6714, BBN, Feb. 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.J. M. McQuillan, G. Falk, and I. Richer. A Review of the Development and Performance of the ARPANET Routing Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 1802-1811, De~c. 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.J. M. McQuillan, I. Richer, and E. C. Rosen. ARPANET Routing Algorithm Improvements: First Semiannual Technical Report. BBN Report 3803, BBN, Apr. 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10.J. M. McQuillan, I. Richer, and E. C. Rosen. The New Routing Algorithm for the ARPANET. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 711-719, May 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.J.M. McQuillan, I. Richer, E. C. Rosen, and D. P. Bertsekas. ARPANET Routing Algorithm Improvements: 2nd Semiannual Technical Report. BBN Report 3940, BBN, Oct. 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.J.M. McQuillan, I. Richer, E. C. Rosen, and J. G. Herman. ARPANET Routing Algorithm Improvements: 3rd Semiannual Technical Report. BBN Report 3940, BBN, Oct. 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13.E. C. Rosen. The Updating Protocol of ARPANET's New Routing Algorithm. Computer Networks, 4:11- 19, Feb. 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.J. A. Zinky, A. Khanna, and G. Vichniac. Performance of the Revised Routing Metric for ARPANET and MILNET. Submitted to MILCOM 89, March 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The revised ARPANET routing metric

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCOMM '89: Symposium proceedings on Communications architectures & protocols
          August 1989
          313 pages
          ISBN:0897913329
          DOI:10.1145/75246

          Copyright © 1989 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 August 1989

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader