skip to main content
10.1145/777792.777822acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Anisotropic voronoi diagrams and guaranteed-quality anisotropic mesh generation

Published:08 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce anisotropic Voronoi diagrams, a generalization of multiplicatively weighted Voronoi diagrams suitable for generating guaranteed-quality meshes of domains in which long, skinny triangles are required, and where the desired anisotropy varies over the domain. We discuss properties of anisotropic Voronoi diagrams of arbitrary dimensionality---most notably circumstances in which a site can see its entire Voronoi cell. In two dimensions, the anisotropic Voronoi diagram dualizes to a triangulation under these same circumstances. We use these properties to develop an algorithm for anisotropic triangular mesh generation in which no triangle has an angle smaller than 20A, as measured from the skewed perspective of any point in the triangle.

References

  1. Pankaj K. Agarwal, Boris Aronov, and Micha Sharir. Computing Lower Envelopes in Four Dimensions with Applications. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pages 348--358. Association for Computing Machinery, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Pankaj K. Agarwal, Otfried Schwarzkopf, and Micha Sharir. Overlay of Lower Envelopes and its Applications. Technical Report CS-1994-18, Department of Computer Science, Duke University, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Thomas Apel. Anisotropic Finite Elements: Local Estimates and Applications. B. G. Teubner Verlag, Stuttgart, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Franz Aurenhammer and Herbert Edelsbrunner. An Optimal Algorithm for Constructing the Weighted Voronoi Diagram. Pattern Recognition 17:251--257, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Frank J. Bossen and Paul~S. Heckbert. A Pliant Method for Anisotropic Mesh Generation. Fifth International Meshing Roundtable, pages 63--74, October 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Adrian Bowyer. Computing Dirichlet Tessellations. Computer Journal 24(2):162--166, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Paul-Louis George and Houman Borouchaki. Delaunay Triangulation and Meshing: Application to Finite Elements. Hermes, Paris, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dan Halperin and Micha Sharir. New Bounds for Lower Envelopes in Three Dimensions, with Applications to Visibility in Terrains. Discrete & Computational Geometry 12:313--326, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kenneth E. Jansen, Mark S. Shephard, and Mark W. Beall. On Anisotropic Mesh Generation and Quality Control in Complex Flow Problems. Tenth International Meshing Roundtable (Newport Beach, California), pages 341--349. Sandia National Laboratories, October 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Greg Leibon and David Letscher. Delaunay Triangulations and Voronoi Diagrams for Riemannian Manifolds. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (Hong Kong), pages 341--349. Association for Computing Machinery, June 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Xiang-Yang Li, Shang-Hua Teng, and Alper Angor. Biting Ellipses to Generate Anisotropic Mesh. Eighth International Meshing Roundtable (Lake Tahoe, California), pages 97--108, October 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shmuel Rippa. Long and Thin Triangles Can Be Good for Linear Interpolation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 29(1):257--270, February 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jim Ruppert. A Delaunay Refinement Algorithm for Quality 2-Dimensional Mesh Generation. Journal of Algorithms 18(3):548--585, May 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Raimund Seidel. Constrained Delaunay Triangulations and Voronoi Diagrams with Obstacles. 1978--1988 Ten Years IIG (H. S. Poingratz and W. Schinnerl, editors), pages 178--191. Institute for Information Processing, Graz University of Technology, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Micha Sharir. Almost Tight Bounds for Lower Envelopes in Higher Dimensions. Discrete & Computational Geometry 12:327--345, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Micha Sharir and Pankaj K. Agarwal. Davenport-Schinzel Sequences and their Geometric Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jonathan Richard Shewchuk. Tetrahedral Mesh Generation by Delaunay Refinement. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (Minneapolis, Minnesota), pages 86--95. Association for Computing Machinery, June 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. ______. What is a Good Linear Finite Element? Interpolation, Conditioning, Anisotropy, and Quality Measures. Manuscript, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenji Shimada, Atsushi Yamada, and Takayuki Itoh. Anisotropic Triangular Meshing of Parametric Surfaces via Close Packing of Ellipsoidal Bubbles. Sixth International Meshing Roundtable (Park City, Utah), pages 375--390. Sandia National Laboratories, October 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. David F. Watson. Computing the n-dimensional Delaunay Tessellation with Application to Voronoi Polytopes. Computer Journal 24(2):167--172, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Anisotropic voronoi diagrams and guaranteed-quality anisotropic mesh generation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SCG '03: Proceedings of the nineteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry
      June 2003
      398 pages
      ISBN:1581136633
      DOI:10.1145/777792

      Copyright © 2003 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2003

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      SCG '03 Paper Acceptance Rate42of118submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader