skip to main content
10.1145/775152.775215acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An infrastructure for searching, reusing and evolving distributed ontologies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 May 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

The vision of the Semantic Web can only be realized through proliferation of well-known ontologies describing different domains. To enable interoperability in the Semantic Web, it will be necessary to break these ontologies down into smaller, well-focused units that may be reused. Currently, three problems arise in that scenario. Firstly, it is difficult to locate ontologies to be reused, thus leading to many ontologies modeling the same thing. Secondly, current tools do not provide means for reusing existing ontologies while building new ontologies. Finally, ontologies are rarely static, but are being adapted to changing requirements. Hence, an infrastructure for management of ontology changes, taking into account dependencies between ontologies is needed. In this paper we present such an infrastructure addressing the aforementioned problems.

References

  1. J. Arpirez, A. Gomez-Perez, A. Lozano, and H. S. Pinto. (ONTO) 2 Agent: An ontology-based WWW broker to select ontologies. In Proc. 13th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence -- ECAI'98, Brighton, England, August 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Bhide, P. Deoasee, A. Katkar, A. Panchbudhe, and K. Ramamritham. Adaptive Push-Pull: Disseminating Dynamic Web Data. IEEE Transaction on Computers, June 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Connolly, F. van Harmelen, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A. Stein. DAML+OIL (March 2001) Reference Description, http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Y. Ding and D. Fensel. Ontology Library Systems: The Key to Successful Ontology Re-Use. In Proc. 1st Int'l Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS'01), 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Dean et al. OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 Reference, W3C Working Draft 29 July 2002, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Farquhar, R. Fikes, and J. Rice. The Ontolingua server: Tools for collaborative ontology construction. Technical report, Stanford KSL 96--26, September 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Fellbaum. WordNet -- An electronic lexical database. MIT Press, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. Fensel, I. Horrocks, F. van Harmelen, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, and M. Klein. OIL in a Nutshell. In Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-2000), Juan-les-Pins, France, October 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Heery and H. Wagner. A Metadata Registry for the Semantic Web. D-Lib Magazine, 8(5), 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Heflin and J.A. Hendler. Dynamic Ontologies on the Web. In Proc. 7th Nat'l Conf. on Artificial Intelligence AAAI-2000. AAAI/MIT Press, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Klein, A. Kiryakov, D. Ognyanov, and D Fensel. Ontology Versioning and Change Detection on the Web. Siguenza, Spain, October 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Maedche. Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Maedche, B. Motik, L. Stojanovic, R. Studer, and R. Volz. Ontologies for Enterprise Knowledge Management. To appear in: IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Meyer. Object-oriented Software Construction (2nd Edition). Prentice Hall, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Motik, A. Maedche, and R. Volz. A Conceptual Modeling Approach for Semantics-driven Enterprise Applications. In Proc. 1st Int'l Conf. on Ontologies, Databases and Application of Semantics (ODBASE-2002), October 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. N. F. Noy, R. W. Fergerson, and M. A. Musen. The knowledge model of Protege-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. In Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-2000), Juan-les-Pins, France, October 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M.T. Oezsu and P. Valduriez. Principles of Distributed Database Systems. Prentice Hall International, Inc., 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. G. Pierre and M. van Steen. Dynamicaly Selecting Optimal Distribution Strategies on Web Documents. IEEE Transaction on Computers, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. L. Stojanovic, A. Maedche, B. Motik, and N. Stojanovic. User-driven Ontology Evolution Management. In Proc. 13th European Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-2002), Siguenza, Spain, October 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Sure, J. Angele, and S. Staab. Guiding Ontology Development by Methodology and Inferencing. In Proc. 1st Int'l Conf. on Ontologies, Databases and Application of Semantics (ODBASE-2002), October 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An infrastructure for searching, reusing and evolving distributed ontologies

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WWW '03: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web
            May 2003
            772 pages
            ISBN:1581136803
            DOI:10.1145/775152

            Copyright © 2003 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 May 2003

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader