ABSTRACT
The vision of the Semantic Web can only be realized through proliferation of well-known ontologies describing different domains. To enable interoperability in the Semantic Web, it will be necessary to break these ontologies down into smaller, well-focused units that may be reused. Currently, three problems arise in that scenario. Firstly, it is difficult to locate ontologies to be reused, thus leading to many ontologies modeling the same thing. Secondly, current tools do not provide means for reusing existing ontologies while building new ontologies. Finally, ontologies are rarely static, but are being adapted to changing requirements. Hence, an infrastructure for management of ontology changes, taking into account dependencies between ontologies is needed. In this paper we present such an infrastructure addressing the aforementioned problems.
- J. Arpirez, A. Gomez-Perez, A. Lozano, and H. S. Pinto. (ONTO) 2 Agent: An ontology-based WWW broker to select ontologies. In Proc. 13th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence -- ECAI'98, Brighton, England, August 1998.]]Google Scholar
- M. Bhide, P. Deoasee, A. Katkar, A. Panchbudhe, and K. Ramamritham. Adaptive Push-Pull: Disseminating Dynamic Web Data. IEEE Transaction on Computers, June 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Connolly, F. van Harmelen, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A. Stein. DAML+OIL (March 2001) Reference Description, http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference.]]Google Scholar
- Y. Ding and D. Fensel. Ontology Library Systems: The Key to Successful Ontology Re-Use. In Proc. 1st Int'l Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS'01), 2001.]]Google Scholar
- M. Dean et al. OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 Reference, W3C Working Draft 29 July 2002, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.]]Google Scholar
- A. Farquhar, R. Fikes, and J. Rice. The Ontolingua server: Tools for collaborative ontology construction. Technical report, Stanford KSL 96--26, September 1996.]]Google Scholar
- C. Fellbaum. WordNet -- An electronic lexical database. MIT Press, 1998.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Fensel, I. Horrocks, F. van Harmelen, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, and M. Klein. OIL in a Nutshell. In Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-2000), Juan-les-Pins, France, October 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Heery and H. Wagner. A Metadata Registry for the Semantic Web. D-Lib Magazine, 8(5), 2002.]]Google Scholar
- J. Heflin and J.A. Hendler. Dynamic Ontologies on the Web. In Proc. 7th Nat'l Conf. on Artificial Intelligence AAAI-2000. AAAI/MIT Press, 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Klein, A. Kiryakov, D. Ognyanov, and D Fensel. Ontology Versioning and Change Detection on the Web. Siguenza, Spain, October 2002.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Maedche. Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Maedche, B. Motik, L. Stojanovic, R. Studer, and R. Volz. Ontologies for Enterprise Knowledge Management. To appear in: IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2003.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Meyer. Object-oriented Software Construction (2nd Edition). Prentice Hall, 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Motik, A. Maedche, and R. Volz. A Conceptual Modeling Approach for Semantics-driven Enterprise Applications. In Proc. 1st Int'l Conf. on Ontologies, Databases and Application of Semantics (ODBASE-2002), October 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. F. Noy, R. W. Fergerson, and M. A. Musen. The knowledge model of Protege-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. In Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-2000), Juan-les-Pins, France, October 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- M.T. Oezsu and P. Valduriez. Principles of Distributed Database Systems. Prentice Hall International, Inc., 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Pierre and M. van Steen. Dynamicaly Selecting Optimal Distribution Strategies on Web Documents. IEEE Transaction on Computers, 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Stojanovic, A. Maedche, B. Motik, and N. Stojanovic. User-driven Ontology Evolution Management. In Proc. 13th European Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-2002), Siguenza, Spain, October 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Sure, J. Angele, and S. Staab. Guiding Ontology Development by Methodology and Inferencing. In Proc. 1st Int'l Conf. on Ontologies, Databases and Application of Semantics (ODBASE-2002), October 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- An infrastructure for searching, reusing and evolving distributed ontologies
Recommendations
Reusing ontologies and language components for ontology generation
Realizing the Semantic Web involves creating ontologies, a tedious and costly challenge. Reuse can reduce the cost of ontology engineering. Semantic Web ontologies can provide useful input for ontology reuse. However, the automated reuse of such ...
Evolving open and independent ontologies
In this paper, we address the problem of evolving open and independent ontologies, by proposing a novel ontology evolution methodology called H-CHANGE and a set of related techniques. After providing a formal definition of distributed concept, we ...
Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study
Technologies for the efficient and effective reuse of ontological knowledge are one of the key success factors for the Semantic Web. Putting aside matters of cost or quality, being reusable is an intrinsic property of ontologies, originally conceived of ...
Comments