skip to main content
10.1145/642611.642631acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

High precision touch screen interaction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 April 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bare hand pointing on touch screens both benefits and suffers from the nature of direct input. This work explores techniques to overcome its limitations. Our goal is to design interaction tools allowing pixel level pointing in a fast and efficient manner. Based on several cycles of iterative design and testing, we propose two techniques: Cross-Keys that uses discrete taps on virtual keys integrated with a crosshair cursor, and an analog Precision-Handle that uses a leverage (gain) effect to amplify movement precision from the user's finger tip to the end cursor. We conducted a formal experiment with these two techniques, in addition to the previously known Zoom-Pointing and Take-Off as baseline anchors. Both subjective and performance measurements indicate that Precision-Handle and Cross-Keys complement existing techniques for touch screen interaction.

References

  1. Accot, J. and S. Zhai. More than dotting the i's - foundations for crossing-based interfaces. Proc. CHI 2002. p. 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Instrumental Interaction: An Interaction Model for Designing Post-WIMP User Interfaces. Proc. CHI 2000. p. 446--453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bederson, B.B. and J.D. Hollan. PAD++: Zooming graphical interface for exploring alternative interface physics. Proc. UIST. 1994. p. 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Card, S.K., W.K. English, and B.J. Burr, Evaluation of mouse, rate controlled isometric joystick, step keys and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 1978. 21: p. 601--613.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fitts, P.M., The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954. 47: p. 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Furnas, G.W. and B.B. Bederson. Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces. Proc. CHI 1995. p. 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Guiard, Y., M. Beaudouin-Lafon, and D. Mottet. Navigation as multiscale pointing: Extending fitts' model to very high precision tasks. Proc. CHI 1999. p. 450--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Guiard, Y., F. Gourgeouis, D. Mottet, and M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Beyond the 10-bit barrier: Fitts' law in multi-scale electronic worlds. Proc. People and Computers XV: Joint Conference of IHM 2001 and HCI 2001. 2001: Springer. p. 573--587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hornbæk, K., B. Bederson, and C. Plaisant, Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, in press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. ISO, ISO 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, 2000, International Organization for Standardization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Leahy, M. and D. Hix. Effect of touch screen target location on user accuracy. Proc. The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 1990. p. 370--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. MacKenzie, I.S., Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 1992. 7: p. 91--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Potter, R.L., L.J. Weldon, and B. Shneiderman. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies. Proc. CHI, 1988. p. 27--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ren, X. and S. Moriya, Improving selection performance on pen-based systems: A study of pen-input interaction for selection tasks. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 2000. 7(3): p. 384--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Schultz, K., D. Batten, and T. Sluchak, Optimal viewing angle for touch-screen displays: Is there such a thing? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1998. 22: p. 343--350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sears, A. and B. Shneiderman, High Precision Touch-screens: Design Strategies and Comparison with a Mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1991. 43(4): p. 593--613. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shneiderman, B., Touch screens now offer compelling uses. IEEE Software, 1991. 8(2): p. 93--94, 107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zhai, S., On the Validity of Throughput as a Characteristic of Computer Input, IBM Research Report RJ 10253, 2002, IBM Almaden Research Center: San Jose, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. High precision touch screen interaction

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2003
          620 pages
          ISBN:1581136307
          DOI:10.1145/642611

          Copyright © 2003 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 April 2003

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '03 Paper Acceptance Rate75of468submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader