skip to main content
10.1145/640075.640077acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecombConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

On de novo interpretation of tandem mass spectra for peptide identification

Published:10 April 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

The correct interpretation of tandem mass spectra is a difficult problem, even when it is limited to scoring peptides against a database. De novo sequencing is considerably harder, but critical when sequence databases are incomplete or not available. In this paper we build upon earlier work due to Dancik et al., and Chen et al. to provide a dynamic programming algorithm for interpreting de novo spectra. Our method can handle most of the commonly occurring ions, including a; b; y, and their neutral losses. Additionally, we shift the emphasis away from sequencing to assigning ion types to peaks. In particular, we introduce the notion of core interpretations, which allow us to give confidence values to individual peak assignments, even in the absence of a strong interpretation. Finally, we introduce a systematic approach to evaluating de novo algorithms as a function of spectral quality. We show that our algorithm, in particular the core-interpretation, is robust in the presence of measurement error, and low fragmentation probability.

References

  1. V. Bafna and N. Edwards. SCOPE: a probabilistic model for scoring tandem mass spectra against a peptide database. Bioinformatics, 17 Suppl 1:S13--21, June 2001. Appeared in Intl. Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Bartels. Fast algorithm for peptide sequencing by mass spectrometry. Biomedical and Environmental Mass Spectrometry, 19:363--368, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. T. Chen, M. Y. Kao, M. Tepel, J. Rush, and G.M. Church. A dynamic programming approach to de novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Computational Biology, 8(6):571--83, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. V. Dancik, T. Addona, K. Clauser, J. Vath, and P.A. Pevzner. De novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Computational Biology, 6:327--342, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Fernandez de Cossio, J. Gonzales, and V. Besada. Protein identification using mass spectrometric information. Comput. Appl. Biosci., 11:427--434, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Eng, A. McCormack, and J. Yates. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. Journal of American Society of Mass Spectrometry, 5:976--989, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D. Fenyo, J. Qin, and B.T. Chait. Protein identification using mass spectrometric information. Electrophoresis, 19(6):998--1005, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. R.J. Johnson and K. Biemann. Computer program (seqpep) to aid in the interpretation of high-energy collision tandem mass spectra of peptides. Biomedical and Environmental Mass Spectrometry, 18:945--957, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D.J. Lipman and W.R. Pearson. Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. Science, 227:1435--1441, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Mann and M. Wilm. Error-tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags. Analytical Chemistry, 66:4390--4399, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. P. A. Pevzner. Computational Molecular Biology: An Algorithmic Approach. MIT Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P.A. Pevzner, V. Dancik, and C.L. Tang. Mutation-tolerant protein identification by mass-spectrometry. In R. Shamir, S. Miyano, S. Istrail, P.A. Pevzner, and M.S. Waterman, editors, International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB), pages 231--236. ACM Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J.A. Taylor and R.S. Johnson. Sequence database searches via de novo peptide sequencing by mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 11:1067--1075, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On de novo interpretation of tandem mass spectra for peptide identification

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          RECOMB '03: Proceedings of the seventh annual international conference on Research in computational molecular biology
          April 2003
          352 pages
          ISBN:1581136358
          DOI:10.1145/640075

          Copyright © 2003 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 April 2003

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          RECOMB '03 Paper Acceptance Rate35of175submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate148of538submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader