Abstract
We examined gender differences and differences in Computer Science (CS) majors vs. non-majors in ability in quantitative areas, educational goals and interests, experience with computers, stereotypes and knowledge about CS, confidence, personality, support and encouragement, stress and financial issues, gender discrimination, and attitudes toward the academic environment in CS. What is unique to this investigation is its multivariate nature. While others have studied these variables in isolation, our study looks at them collectively to identify important interactions among variables. This will eventually allow us to identify a profile of women who pursue careers in CS. The findings are reported in detail below. Particularly noteworthy is that men had more confidence in using computers than did women even when statistically controlling quantitative ability. In fact, female CS majors had less computer confidence than did male non-majors.
- Beyer, S. Gender Differences in the Accuracy of Self evaluations of Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (1990), 960--970.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beyer, S. Maternal Employment and Children's Academic Achievement: Parenting Style as Mediating Variable. Developmental Review 15 (1995), 212--253.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beyer, S. Gender Differences in Self-perception and Negative Recall Biases. Sex Roles 38 (1998), 103--133.Google Scholar
- Beyer, S. The Accuracy of Academic Gender Stereotypes. Sex Roles 40 (1999a) 787--813.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beyer, S. Gender Differences in the Accuracy of Grade Expectancies and Evaluations. Sex Roles 41 (1999b), 279--296.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beyer, S. The Accuracy of Self-evaluations of Females, Males, Dysphorics, and Nondysphorics in Subject Areas of Varying Gender-type. Manuscript submitted for publication (2002).Google Scholar
- Beyer, S. The Effects of Gender, Dysphoria, and Performance Feedback on the Accuracy of Self-evaluations. Sex Roles (in press).Google Scholar
- Beyer, S. and Bowden E. M. Gender Differences in Self-perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (1997), 157--172.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beyer, S., Chavez, M., and Rynes, K. Gender Differences in Attitudes toward and Confidence in Computer Science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL. (2002, May).Google Scholar
- Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Chavez, M., Hay, K., and Perrault, J. Why are There so Few Women in Computer Science? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, New Orleans, LA. (2002, June).Google Scholar
- Cohoon, J. M. Recruiting and Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing Majors. SIGCSE Bulletin 34(2) (June 2002), 48--52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cross, S. E. and Madson, L. Elaboration of Models of the Self: Reply to Baumeister and Sommer (1997) and Martin and Ruble (1997). Psychological Bulletin 122 (1997), 51--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hecker, D. E. Occupational Employment Projections to 2010. Monthly Labor Review (November 2001), 57--84.Google Scholar
- Henwood, F. Exceptional women? Gender and Technology in U.K. Higher Education. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine (1999/2000), 21--27.Google Scholar
- Inzlicht, M. and Ben-Zeev, T. A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males. Psychological Science 11 (2000), 365--371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jepson, A., and Perl, T. Priming the Pipeline. SIGCSE Bulletin 36(2) (June 2002), 36--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John, O. P. and Robins, R. W. Determinants of Interjudge Agreement on Personality Traits: The Big Five Domains, Observability, Evaluativeness, and the Unique Perspective of the Self. Journal of Personality 61 (1993), 521--551.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. Geek Mythology and Attracting Undergraduate Women to Computer Science. Impacting Change through Collaboration. Proceedings of the Joint National Conference of the Women in Engineering Program Advocates Network and the National Association of Minority Engineering Program Administrators (1997).Google Scholar
- Margolis, J., Fisher, A., and Miller, F. The Anatomy of Interest: Women in Undergraduate Computer Science. Women's Studies Quarterly 28 (2000), 104--127.Google Scholar
- Markus, H. R. and Kitayama, S. Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review 98 (1991), 224--253.Google Scholar
- Rasmussen, B. and Hapnes, T. Excluding Women from the Technologies of the Future? A Case Study of the Culture of Computer Science. Futures 23 (1991), 1107--1119.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. M. Talking about Leaving: Factors Contributing to High Attrition Rates among Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Undergraduate Major (1994) Boulder: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics 1999 (2000).Google Scholar
- Zubrow, D. How Computing Attitudes Change during the Freshman Year. In S. Kiesler & L. Sproull (Eds.), Computing and Change on Campus (pp. 195--211) (1987). New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Gender differences in computer science students
Recommendations
Eliminating Gender Bias in Computer Science Education Materials
SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationLow female participation in Computer Science is a known problem. Studies reveal that female students are less confident in their CS skills and knowledge than their male counterparts, despite parallel academic performance indicators. While prior studies ...
Gender differences in computer science students
SIGCSE '03: Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science educationWe examined gender differences and differences in Computer Science (CS) majors vs. non-majors in ability in quantitative areas, educational goals and interests, experience with computers, stereotypes and knowledge about CS, confidence, personality, ...
Social Perceptions in Computer Science and Implications for Diverse Students
ICER '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education ResearchThe barriers to diversity in computer science (CS) are complex, consisting of both structural and social barriers. In this paper, we focus on social perceptions for students in grades 7-12 in the U.S. using surveys of nationally representative samples ...
Comments