skip to main content
10.1145/581710.581726acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Acting to know: improving creativity in the design of mobile services by using performances

Published:13 October 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper contrasts two views on knowing: those of the observer and the active actor in a situation. The paper suggests that there are design cases where performance can produce different knowledge. The paper reviews the use of performances in theatre and discusses a technique to use performances in the design of mobile services. The technique is illustrated by example. The session are analysed to describe creativity and knowledge of participants.

References

  1. Bauman, R., Story, performance, event, Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barba, E., Savarese, N., A Dictionary of Theatre Anthropology: The Secret Art of the Performer, London: Routledge 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boal, A., Games for Actors and Non-Actors, Routledge Press, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt, E., Grunnet, C., Evoking the Future: Drama and Props in user Centred Design, In: the proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Cherkasky, T., Greenbaum, J., Mambrey, P. (eds), New York, November 28-1 December 2000, CPSR, pp 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchenau, M. Fulton Suri, J., Experience Prototyping, In the Proceeding of the DIS2000, Designing Interactive Systems, NYC, USA, ACM Press, pp. 424--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., (1997) Creativity : Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, Harper Collins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Davydov, V.V. (1984) Substantial generalization and the dialectical-materialist theory of thinking. In M. Hedegaard, P. Hakkarainen, & Y. Engeströöm (Eds.) Learning and teaching on a scientific basis. Aarhus University, Institute of Psychology, Aarhus.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1988) The Later Works, 1925--1953, Vol. 4. 1929. (ed. J. A. Boydston). Southern Illinois Univ. Press, Carbondale & EdwardsvilleGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehn, P. (1988). Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Stockholm, Arbetslivscentrum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Goffman, E., The presentation of self in everyday life, Garden City, NY, Doubleday, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Iacucci, G., Kuutti, K., Ranta, M., On the Move with a Magic Thing: Role Playing in the Design of Mobile Services and Devices, In the Proceeding of the DIS2000, Designing Interactive Systems, New York City, USA, ACM Press, pp. 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Johnstone, K., Impro : Improvisation and the Theatre, Theatre Arts Books, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Keinonen, T. Anything but Whatsoever. Speech given in the "Designer of the year in Finland 2001" - seminar, Museum of Modern Art Kiasma, Helsinki 21.11.2000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Koestler, Arthur. (1964, 1990). The Act of Creation . NY: Macmillan, Paperback.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuutti, K., Tuikka, T., Kerttula, M., Pulli, P.(1997) VIRPI-project: Virtual Prototyping Services for Electronics and Telecommunication Industry. Rossignac (ed) Proceedings of the TeamCAD Conference, Georgia Tech UniversityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Pulli, P., Pyssysalo, T., Kuutti, K., Similä, J. Metsävainio, J-P., Komulainen, O. (1998) CyPhone - Future Personal Telecooperation Device. In Traunmüller, R. & Cshuhááj-Varjú, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the XV. IFIP World Computer Congress 31 Vienna/Budapest, Österr. Computer Ges., pp. 529--540.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Salvador, T., Sato, S., Playacting and Focus Troupe: Theater techniques for creating quick, intense, immersive, and engaging focus group sessions. Interactions of the ACM, Sept. + Oct. 1999, Pp. 35--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sawyer, R., K., (1998) The interdisciplinary study of creativity in Performance, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 11--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sawyer, K., The emergence of creativity, Philosophical Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Schieffelin,E. Problematizing Performance. In Ritual, Performance, Media. Hughes-Freeland, F., Editor. 1997; 194--207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Schön, D., The Reflective Practitioner - how professionals think in action, Ashgate Arena, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Schön, D, Bennet, J., Reflective Conversation with Materials, An interview with Donald Schön by John Bennett, In: Terry Winograd (ed.) Bringing Design to Software, Addison-Wesley. 1996 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sutton-Smith, B., The role of toys in the instigation of playful creativity, Creativity Research Journal, Vol 5 (1), 3--11, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Toulmin, S. (1990) Cosmopolis. The hidden agenda of modernity. Chigago, The University of Chigago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Toulmin, S. (2001) Return to Reason. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tuikka, T. & Kuutti, K., Thinking Together in Concept Design for Future Products - Emergent Features for Computer Support. Proceedings of the Cognitive Technology 2001 conference Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Turner, V., Drama Fields and metaphors. Ithaca: Cornel University Press, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Turner V., From Ritual to Theatre, the human Seriousness of Play, PAJ Publications 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ward, T. B., Finke, R. A., and Smith, S. M. (1995) Creativity And The Mind. NY: Plenum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Winograd, T. and F. Flores (1987). Understanding Computers and Cognition. A New Foundation for Design. New Jersey, Ablex. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Eco, U., Semiotics of Theatrical performance, Drama Review 21/1, Mar 1977, 107--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Acting to know: improving creativity in the design of mobile services by using performances

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        C&C '02: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity & cognition
        October 2002
        212 pages
        ISBN:1581134657
        DOI:10.1145/581710

        Copyright © 2002 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 October 2002

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader