skip to main content
article

Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers

Published:29 August 2002Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Trust is emerging as a potentially central aspect leading to IT acceptance. It is especially needed in the case of gaining and later retaining consumers of online vendors. This has been shown by previous research using single dimensional constructs. But trust can also be viewed as a multi-dimensional construct combining specific beliefs (sometimes labeled as trustworthiness) that either directly or through an overall assessment of trust influence relevant behavioral intentions. To show the need to examine trust in a multi-dimensional perspective, this study proposes a three-dimensional scale of trustworthiness dealing with integrity, benevolence, and ability in the unique case of online consumer trust, and then shows the importance of examining the effects of each dimension individually. The data show that trustworthiness and trust should not be regarded as a single construct with a single effect. Rather, different beliefs influence different consumer activity intentions. Window-shopping intentions was affected by the ability-trustworthiness of the vendor, while overall trust in the vendor and its integrity-trustworthiness affected purchase intentions. The importance of differentiating among online customer activities and what dimensions of trustworthiness affect each is discussed.

References

  1. Bagozzi, R.P. (1980). Causal Methods in Marketing, New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BBC (2000). "E-commerce Suffers from Security Fears," BBC Online, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_862000/862253.stm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Boudreau, M., Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (2001). "Validation in IS Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Butler, J.-K. and Cantrell, R.S. (1984). "A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates," Psychological-Reports, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 19--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cole, S.J. (1998). "Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade and Consumer Protection Committee on Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.," Better Business Bureau, www.bbb.org/alerts/cole.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronbach, L.J. (1971). "Test Validation," In Educational Measurement, R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, pp. 443--507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Crosby, L.A., Evans, K.R. and Cowles, D. (1990). "Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. pp. 68--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Davis, F.D. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3 (September), pp. 319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Deutsch, M. (1958). "Trust and Suspicion," Conflict Resolution, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 265--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. DiSabatino, J. (2000). "Boo.com Failure Raises Questions About Online Boutiques," Computerworld Online, http://www.computerworld.com/home/print.nsf/CWFlash/000612E76A.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobing, B.R. (1993). "Building Trust in User-Analyst Relationships," unpublished Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Doney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P. (1997). "An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61, No. April, pp. 35--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Doney, P.M., Cannon, J.P. and Mullen, M.R. (1998). "Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 601--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fromkin, H.L. and Streufert, S. (1976). "Laboratory Experimentation," In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, B. Dunnette (Ed.), Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, pp. 415--465.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ganesan, S. (1994). "Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. April, pp. 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Gefen, D. (1997). "Building Users' Trust in Freeware Providers and the Effects of this Trust on Users' Perceptions of Usefulness, Ease of Use and Intended Use," unpublished Dissertation, Georgia State University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Gefen, D. (2000). "E-Commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust," Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 725--737.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Gefen, D. (2002). "Nurturing Clients' Trust to Encourage Engagement Success During the Customization of ERP Systems," Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Gefen, D. and DeVine, P. (2001). "Customer Loyalty to an Online Store: The Meaning of Online Service Quality," Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 613--617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gefen, D. and Silver, M. (1999). "Lessons learned from the successful adoption of an ERP system," Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 5th international Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute (DSI), Athens, Greece, pp. 1054--1057.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (2002). "Managing User Trust in B2C e-Services," eService Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W. and Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). "Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice," Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 1--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C. (1988). "An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 25, No. May, pp. 186--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Giffin, K. (1967). "The Contribution of Studies of Source Credibility to a Theory of Interpersonal Trust in the Communication Process," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 104--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Hair, J.F.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hart, K.-M., Capps, H.R., Cangemi, J.-P. and Caillouet, L.-M. (1986). "Exploring organizational trust and its multiple dimensions: A case study of General Motors," Organization-Development-Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 31--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hosmer, L.T. (1995). "Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 379--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Knoll, K. and Leidner, D.E. (1998). "Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Spring), pp. 29--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Tractinsky, N. (1999). "Consumer Trust in an Internet Store: A Cross-Cultural Validation," Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar, N. (1996). "The Power of Trust in Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No. 6, pp. 92--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K. and Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. (1995a). "The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 17, No. pp. 348--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K. and Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. (1995b). "The Effects of Supplier Fairness on Vulnerable Resellers," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 17, No. February, pp. 54--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Larzelere, R.E. and Huston, T.L. (1980). "The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships," Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. August, No. pp. 595--604.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Legard, D. (1999). "Visa: E-commerce Is Major Fraud Source," Computerworld Online News, www.computerworld.com/home/news.nsf/CWFlash/9903243visa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewis, J.D. and Weigert, A. (1985). "Trust as a Social Reality," Social Forces, Vol. 63, No. 4(June), pp. 967--985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power, Great Britain: John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Mayer, R., C. and Davis, J.H. (1999). "The Effect of the Performance Appraisal System on Trust in Management: A Field Quasi-Experiment," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.84, No.1, pp. 123--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995). "An Integration Model of Organizational Trust," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3 (July), pp. 709--734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. McKnight, D.H. and Chervany, N.L. (2001). "While Trust is Cool and Collected, Distrust is Fiery and Frenzied: A Model of Distrust Concepts," Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 883--888.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V. and Kacmar, C. (2000). "Trust in E-Commerce Vendors: A Two-Stage Model," Proceedings of the Twenty First International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 532--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Moorman, C., Deshpande, R. and Zaltman, G. (1993). "Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. January, pp. 81--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. and Deshpande, R. (1992). "Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29, No. August, pp. 314--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D. (1994). "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. July, pp. 20--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. NetValue (2001). "NetValue NewsLetter - January 2001," NetValue.Com, http://www.netvalue.com/corp/news/index.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. NIST (2001). "1.3.5.16. Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-Fit Test," National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35g.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Ohlson, K. (1999). "e-Commerce Vendors Team to Help Better Track Web Shoppers," Computerworld Online, www.computerworld.com/home/news.nsf/cwflash/9903232andro.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, C.S. (2002). "Research Commentry: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research -- A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 121--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Papoulis, A. (1984). Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Process, McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramaswani, S.N., Srinivasan, S.S. and Gorton, S.A. (1997). "Information Asymmetry Between Salesperson and Supervisor: Postulates from Agency and Social Exchange Theory," Jouranl of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 29--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Reichheld, F.F. and Schefter, P. (2000). "E-Loyalty: Your Secret Weapon on the Web," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 105--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Rempel, J.K., Holmes, J.G. and Zanna, M.P. (1985). "Trust in Close Relationships," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 95--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Rogers, T.B. (1995). The Psychological Testing Enterprise, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Rose, G., Khoo, H. and Straub, D.W. (1999). "Current Technological Impediments to Business-to-Consumer Electronic Commerce," Communications of the AIS, Vol. 1, No. 16 (June), pp. 1--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Rosencrance, L. (2000a). "Amazon Loses 2 Partners Over Privacy Policy," Computerworld, http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO50529,00.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosencrance, L. (2000b). "Amazon.com's Privacy Policies in Spotlight Again, U.S., U.K. probes urged," Computerworld, http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO54993,00.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosencrance, L. (2000c). "Groups ask FTC to investigate Amazon.com's privacy policies," http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO54730,00.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Rotter, J.B. (1971). "Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust," American Psychologist, Vol. 26, No. May, pp. 443--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Schurr, P.H. and Ozanne, J.L. (1985). "Influences on Exchange Processes: Buyers' Preconceptions of a Seller's Trustworthiness and Bargaining Toughness," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 11, No. March, pp. 939--953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Segars, A.H. (1997). "Assessing the Unidimensionality of Measurement: A Paradigm and Illustration within the Context of Information Systems Research," Omega, Vol. 25, No. 1 (February), pp. 107--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Segars, A.L. and Grover, V. (1993). "Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 517--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Straub, D.W. (1989). "Validating Instruments in MIS Research," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 147--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. The Economist (2000). "E-Commerce: Shopping Around The World," The Economist, February 26, pp. 5--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Zucker, L.G. (1986). "Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840--1920," In Research in Organizational Behavior, B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Ed.), 8, Greenwich, CN: JAI Press, pp. 53--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
        ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 33, Issue 3
        Summer 2002
        63 pages
        ISSN:0095-0033
        EISSN:1532-0936
        DOI:10.1145/569905
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2002 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 August 2002

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader