skip to main content
article

Interactive motion generation from examples

Published:01 July 2002Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

There are many applications that demand large quantities of natural looking motion. It is difficult to synthesize motion that looks natural, particularly when it is people who must move. In this paper, we present a framework that generates human motions by cutting and pasting motion capture data. Selecting a collection of clips that yields an acceptable motion is a combinatorial problem that we manage as a randomized search of a hierarchy of graphs. This approach can generate motion sequences that satisfy a variety of constraints automatically. The motions are smooth and human-looking. They are generated in real time so that we can author complex motions interactively. The algorithm generates multiple motions that satisfy a given set of constraints, allowing a variety of choices for the animator. It can easily synthesize multiple motions that interact with each other using constraints. This framework allows the extensive re-use of motion capture data for new purposes.

References

  1. BISHOP, C. M. 1995. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BOWDEN, R., 2000. Learning statistical models of human motion.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BRAND, M., AND HERTZMANN, A. 2001. Style machines. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, 15-22. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. BROGAN, D. C., METOYER, R. A., AND HODGINS, J. K. 1998. Dynamically simulated characters in virtual environments. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 18, 5, 58-69. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CHENNEY, S., AND FORSYTH, D. A. 2000. Sampling plausible solutions to multi-body constraint problems. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, 219-228. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. CHOI, M. G., LEE, J., AND SHIN, S. Y. 2000. A probabilistic approach to planning biped locomotion with prescribed motions. Tech. rep., Computer Science Department, KAIST.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. DEMPSTER, W., AND GAUGHRAN, G. 1965. Properties of body segments based on size and weight. In American Journal of Anatomy, vol. 120, 33-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. EFROS, A. A., AND LEUNG, T. K. 1999. Texture synthesis by non-parametric sampling. In ICCV (2), 1033-1038. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. FORTNEY, V. 1983. The kinematics and kinetics of the running pattern of two-, four- and six-year-old children. In Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, vol. 54(2), 126-135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. FUNGE, J., TU, X., AND TERZOPOULOS, D. 1999. Cognitive modeling: Knowledge, reasoning and planning for intelligent characters. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999, 29-38. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. GALATA, A., JOHNSON, N., AND HOGG, D. 2001. Learning variable length markov models of behaviour. In Computer Vision and Image Understanding (CVIU) Journal, vol. 81, 398-413. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. GERSHO, A., AND GRAY, R. 1992. Vector Quantization and signal compression. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. GILKS, W., RICHARDSON, S., AND SPIEGELHALTER, D. 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. GLEICHER, M. 1998. Retargetting motion to new characters. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1998, vol. 32, 33-42. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. GRZESZCZUK, R., AND TERZOPOULOS, D. 1995. Automated learning of muscle-actuated locomotion through control abstraction. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1995, 63-70. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. GRZESZCZUK, R., TERZOPOULOS, D., AND HINTON, G. 1998. Neuroanimator: Fast neural network emulation and control of physics based models. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1998, 9-20. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. HEEGER, D. J., AND BERGEN, J. R. 1995. Pyramid-Based texture analysis/synthesis. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1995, 229-238. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. HODGINS, J. K., AND POLLARD, N. S. 1997. Adapting simulated behaviors for new characters. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1997, vol. 31, 153-162. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. HODGINS, J., WOOTEN, W., BROGAN, D., AND O'BRIEN, J., 1995. Animated human athletics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. KOVAR, L., GLEICHER, M., AND PIGHIN, F. 2002. Motion graphs. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. LAMOURET, A., ANDVAN DE PANNE, M. 1996. Motion synthesis by example. In Eurographics Computer Animation and Simulation '96, 199-212. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. LATOMBE, J. P. 1999. Motion planning: A journey of robots, molecules, digital actors, and other artifacts. In International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 18, 1119-1128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. LEE, J., AND SHIN, S. Y. 1999. A hierarchical approach to interactive motion editing for human-likefigures. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999, 39-48. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. LEE, J., CHAI, J., REITSMA, P., HODGINS, J., AND POLLARD, N. 2002. Interactive control of avatars animated with human motion data. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. LI, Y., WANG, T., AND SHUM, H. Y. 2002. Motion texture: A two-level statistical model for character motion synthesis. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. MATARIC, M. J. 2000. Getting humanoids to move and imitate. In IEEE Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 18-24. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. MCMAHON, T. 1984. Muscles, Reflexes and Locomotion. PhD thesis, Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. MOLINA-TANCO, L., AND HILTON, A. 2000. Realistic synthesis of novel human movements from a database of motion capture examples. In Workshop on Human Motion (HUMO'00), 137-142. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. NELSON, R., BROOKS, C., AND N. PIKE. 1977. Biomechanical comparison of male and female distance runners. In Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, vol. 301, 793-807.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. O'ROURKE, J. 1998. Computational Geometry in C. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. POPOVlC, Z. 1999. Motion Transformation by Physically Based Spacetime Optimization. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University Department of Computer Science. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. PULLEN, K., AND BREGLER, C. 2000. Animating by multi-level sampling. In Computer Animation 2000, 36-42. ISBN 0-7695-0683-6. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. PULLEN, K., AND BREGLER, C. 2002. Motion capture assisted animation: Texturing and synthesis. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. ROSE, C., GUENTER, B., BODENHEIMER, B., AND COHEN, M. F. 1996. Efficient generation of motion transitions using spacetime constraints. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, vol. 30, 147-154. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. SCHODL, A., SZELISKI, R., SALESIN, D., AND ESSA, I. 2000. Video textures. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, 489-498. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. VEACH, E., AND GUIBAS, L. J. 1997. Metropolis light transport. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1997, vol. 31, 65-76. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. WITKIN, A., AND POPOVIC, Z. 1995. Motion warping. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1995, 105-108. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interactive motion generation from examples

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader