skip to main content
10.1145/511446.511504acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The Yin/Yang web: XML syntax and RDF semantics

Published:07 May 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

XML is the W3C standard document format for writing and exchanging information on the Web. RDF is the W3C standard model for describing the semantics and reasoning about information on the Web. Unfortunately, RDF and XML---although very close to each other---are based on two different paradigms. We argue that in order to lead the Semantic Web to its full potential, the syntax and the semantics of information needs to work together. To this end, we develop a model-theoretic semantics for the XML XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model, which provides a unified model for both XML and RDF. This unified model can serve as the basis for Web applications that deal with both data and semantics. We illustrate the use of this model on a concrete information integration scenario. Our approach enables each side of the fence to benefit from the other, notably, we show how the RDF world can take advantage of XML query languages, and how the XML world can take advantage of the reasoning capabilities available for RDF.

References

  1. B. Amann, I. Fundulaki, and M. Scholl. Integrating ontologies and thesauri for rdf schema creation and metadata querying. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. K. Baru, V. Chu, A. Gupta, B. Ludäscher, R. Marciano, Y. Papakonstantinou, and P. Velikhov. XML-based information mediation for digital libraries. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 214--215, Berkeley, CA, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. J. Bayardo Jr., W. Bohrer, R. S. Brice, A. Cichocki, J. Fowler, A. Helal, V. Kashyap, T. Ksiezyk, G. Martin, M. H. Nodine, M. Rashid, M. Rusinkiewicz, R. Shea, C. Unnikrishnan, A. Unruh, and D. Woelk. InfoSleuth: Semantic integration of information in open and dynamic environments. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 195--206, Tucson, Arizona, May 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Berners-Lee. Why RDF model is different from the XML model, 1999. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDF-XML.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. Boley. A web data model unifying XML and RDF, Sept. 2001. Unpublished draft. http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/~boley/xmlrdf.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Bray, J. Paoli, C. Sperberg-McQueen, and E. Maler. Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0 (second edition). W3C recommendation., Oct. 2000. http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Carlson. Modeling XML Applications with UML. Practical e-Business Applications. Addison-Wesley, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Chamberlin, D. Florescu, J. Robie, J. Siméon, and M. Stefanescu. Xquery 1.0: An xml query language, June 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Cluet, C. Delobel, J. Siméon, and K. Smaga. Your mediators need data conversion! In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 177--188, Seattle, Washington, June 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Cowan and R. Tobin. Xml information set. W3C Recommendation, Oct. 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Enosys markets. http://www.enosysmarkets.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Fernández and J. Marsh. The XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 data model. W3C Working Draft., June 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/query-datamodel/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. F. Fernandez, D. Florescu, J. Kang, A. Y. Levy, and D. Suciu. System demonstration - Strudel: A web-site management system. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), Tucson, Arizona, May 1997. Exhibition Program. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. I. Fundulaki, B. Amann, M. Scholl, C. Beeri, and A.-M. Vercoustre. Mapping xml fragments to community web ontologies. In Fourth International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB'2001), Santa Barbara, CA, June 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Galax xquery 1.0 implementation. http://db.bell-labs.com/galax/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Hayes. RDF model theory. W3C Working Draft, Sept. 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Karvounarakis, V. Christophides, D. Plexousakis, and S. Alexaki. Querying rdf descriptions for community web portals. In The French National Database Conference, BDA'2001, Agadir, Maroc, Oct. 2001. http://139.91.183.30:9090/RDF/RQL/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. O. Lassila and R. Swick. Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification. W3C Recommentation, Feb. 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. X. Leroy. The Objective Caml system, release 3.02, Documentation and user's manual. Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, Sept. 2001. http://caml.inria.fr/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Y. Levy, A. Rajaraman, and J. J. Ordille. Querying heterogeneous information sources using source descriptions. In Proceedings of International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 251--262, Bombay, India, Sept. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Mani, D. Lee, and R. R. Muntz. Semantic data modeling using xml schemas. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2001), Yokohama, Japan, Nov. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. I. Manolescu, D. Florescu, D. Kossmann, F. Xhumari, and D. Olteanu. Agora: Living with xml and relational. In Proceedings of International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 623--626, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Melnik. Bridging the gap between RDF and XML, Dec. 1999. http://www-db.stanford.edu/~melnik/rdf/fusion.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. L. Miller. Inkling: Rdf query using squishql. http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/rdfquery/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nimble technology. http://www.nimble.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Organization for the advancement of structured informationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Y. Papakonstantinou, H. Garcia-Molina, and J. Widom. Object exchange across heterogeneous information sources. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 251--260, Taipei, Taiwan, Mar. 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. Robie, L. M. Garshol, S. Newcomb, M. Biezinski, M. Fuchs, L. Miller, D. Brickley, V. Christophides, and G. Karvounarakis. The syntactic Web: Syntax and semantics on the Web. In Extreme Markup Languages'2001, Montreal, Canada, Aug. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. H. Thompson, D. Beech, M. Maloney, and N. Mendelsohn. XML schema part 1: Structures. W3C Recommentation, May 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. F. van Harmelen, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and I. Horrocks. A model-theoretic semantics for DAML+OIL, Mar. 2001. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/model-theoretic-semantics.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. F. van Harmelen, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and I. Horrocks. Reference description of the DAML+OIL (march 2001) ontology markup language, Mar. 2001. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Yin/Yang web: XML syntax and RDF semantics

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  WWW '02: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web
                  May 2002
                  754 pages
                  ISBN:1581134495
                  DOI:10.1145/511446

                  Copyright © 2002 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 7 May 2002

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader