skip to main content
10.1145/508791.508934acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Augmenting descriptive scenario analysis for improvements in human reliability design

Published:11 March 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is typical for cycles of iteration to be used to refine the current state of the design of a system so that it more closely meets its requirements. Such refinements are in terms of the original requirements specification and any new requirements that have been identified during this process. However, not all defined requirements are equally essential, particularly in high consequence systems where there are issues of dependability. Although descriptive methods for scenario analysis can be used to highlight new requirements, it can be difficult to evaluate the impact of these new requirements.In this paper, we exemplify this problem and investigate how numeric methods can be used to highlight the impact of consequences identified by descriptive scenario analysis. An example from the context of human reliability analysis is presented and dependability issues for system design are considered.

References

  1. P. Ayton. How bad is human judgement? In G. Wright and P. Goodwin, editors, Forecasting with Judgement. Wiley, Chichester, England, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. B. Fields, M. Harrison, and P. Wright. THEA: Human error analysis for requirements definition. Technical Report YCS-97-294, The University of York, Department of Computer Science, 1997. UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Hollnagel. Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control. Computers and People Series. Academic Press, London, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Kirwan. A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment. Taylor and Francis, London, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. W. M. Newman and M. G. Lamming. Interactive System Design. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, UK, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. A. Norman. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Pocock, M. Harrison, P. Wright, and P. Johnson. THEA - a technique for human error assessment early in design. In M. Hirose, editor, Human-Computer Interaction: INTERACT'01, pages 247-254. IOS Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. I. Sommerville. Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, England, fifth edition, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. C. Williams. HEART - a proposed method for assessing and reducing human error. In 9th Advances in Reliability Technology Symposium. University of Bradford, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Augmenting descriptive scenario analysis for improvements in human reliability design

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  SAC '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Applied computing
                  March 2002
                  1200 pages
                  ISBN:1581134452
                  DOI:10.1145/508791

                  Copyright © 2002 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 11 March 2002

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader