Abstract
The automated categorization (or classification) of texts into predefined categories has witnessed a booming interest in the last 10 years, due to the increased availability of documents in digital form and the ensuing need to organize them. In the research community the dominant approach to this problem is based on machine learning techniques: a general inductive process automatically builds a classifier by learning, from a set of preclassified documents, the characteristics of the categories. The advantages of this approach over the knowledge engineering approach (consisting in the manual definition of a classifier by domain experts) are a very good effectiveness, considerable savings in terms of expert labor power, and straightforward portability to different domains. This survey discusses the main approaches to text categorization that fall within the machine learning paradigm. We will discuss in detail issues pertaining to three different problems, namely, document representation, classifier construction, and classifier evaluation.
- AMATI,G.AND CRESTANI, F. 1999. Probabilistic learning for selective dissemination of information. Inform. Process. Man. 35, 5, 633-654.]] Google Scholar
- ANDROUTSOPOULOS, I., KOUTSIAS, J., CHANDRINOS,K.V., AND SPYROPOULOS, C. D. 2000. An experimental comparison of naive Bayesian and keywordbased anti-spam filtering with personal email messages. In Proceedings of SIGIR-00, 23rd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Athens, Greece, 2000), 160-167.]] Google Scholar
- APTE, C., DAMERAU,F.J.,AND WEISS, S. M. 1994. Automated learning of decision rules for text categorization. ACM Trans. on Inform. Syst. 12, 3, 233-251.]] Google Scholar
- ATTARDI, G., DI MARCO,S.,AND SALVI, D. 1998. Categorization by context. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 4, 9, 719-736.]]Google Scholar
- BAKER,L.D.AND MCCALLUM, A. K. 1998. Distributional clustering of words for text classification. In Proceedings of SIGIR-98, 21st ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Melbourne, Australia, 1998), 96-103.]] Google Scholar
- BELKIN,N.J.AND CROFT, W. B. 1992. Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin? Commun. ACM 35, 12, 29- 38.]] Google Scholar
- BIEBRICHER, P., FUHR, N., KNORZ, G., LUSTIG,G.,AND SCHWANTNER, M. 1988. The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS. From research to application. In Proceedings of SIGIR-88, 11th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Grenoble, France, 1988), 333-342. Also reprinted in Sparck Jones and Willett {1997}, pp. 513-517.]] Google Scholar
- BORKO,H.AND BERNICK, M. 1963. Automatic document classification. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 10, 2, 151-161.]] Google Scholar
- CAROPRESO,M.F.,MATWIN,S.,AND SEBASTIANI,F. 2001. A learner-independent evaluation of the usefulness of statistical phrases for automated text categorization. In Text Databases and Document Management: Theory and Practice,A.G. Chin, ed. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 78-102.]] Google Scholar
- CAVNAR,W.B.AND TRENKLE, J. M. 1994. N-grambased text categorization. In Proceedings of SDAIR-94, 3rd Annual Symposium on Docu-ment Analysis and Information Retrieval (Las Vegas, NV, 1994), 161-175.]]Google Scholar
- CHAKRABARTI, S., DOM, B. E., AGRAWAL, R., AND RAGHAVAN, P. 1998a. Scalable feature selec-tion, classification and signature generation for organizing large text databases into hierarchical topic taxonomies. J. Very Large Data Bases 7,3, 163-178.]] Google Scholar
- CHAKRABARTI, S., DOM,B.E.,AND INDYK, P. 1998b. Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks. In Proceedings of SIGMOD-98, ACM International Conference on Management of Data (Seattle, WA, 1998), 307-318.]] Google Scholar
- CLACK, C., FARRINGDON, J., LIDWELL,P.,AND YU,T. 1997. Autonomous document classification for business. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Marina del Rey, CA, 1997), 201-208.]] Google Scholar
- CLEVERDON, C. 1984. Optimizing convenient online access to bibliographic databases. Inform. Serv. Use 4, 1, 37-47. Also reprinted in Willett {1988}, pp. 32-41.]] Google Scholar
- COHEN, W. W. 1995a. Learning to classify English text with ILP methods. In Advances in Inductive Logic Programming, L. De Raedt, ed. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 124-143.]]Google Scholar
- COHEN, W. W. 1995b. Text categorization and relational learning. In Proceedings of ICML-95, 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (Lake Tahoe, CA, 1995), 124-132.]]Google Scholar
- COHEN,W.W.AND HIRSH, H. 1998. Joins that generalize: text classification using WHIRL.InProceedings of KDD-98, 4th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (New York, NY, 1998), 169-173.]]Google Scholar
- COHEN,W.W.AND SINGER, Y. 1999. Contextsensitive learning methods for text categorization. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 17, 2, 141- 173.]] Google Scholar
- COOPER, W. S. 1995. Some inconsistencies and misnomers in probabilistic information retrieval. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 13, 1, 100-111.]] Google Scholar
- CREECY, R. M., MASAND, B. M., SMITH,S.J.,AND WALTZ, D. L. 1992. Trading MIPS and memory for knowledge engineering: classifying census returns on the Connection Machine. Commun. ACM 35, 8, 48-63.]] Google Scholar
- CRESTANI, F., LALMAS, M., VAN RIJSBERGEN,C.J.,AND CAMPBELL, I. 1998. "Is this document rele-vant? : : : probably." A survey of probabilistic models in information retrieval. ACM Comput. Surv. 30, 4, 528-552.]] Google Scholar
- DAGAN, I., KAROV,Y.,AND ROTH, D. 1997. Mistakedriven learning in text categorization. In Proceedings of EMNLP-97, 2nd Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Providence, RI, 1997), 55-63.]]Google Scholar
- DEERWESTER, S., DUMAIS,S.T.,FURNAS,G.W., LANDAUER, T. K., AND HARSHMAN, R. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic indexing. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 41, 6, 391-407.]]Google Scholar
- DENOYER, L., ZARAGOZA, H., AND GALLINARI, P. 2001. HMM-based passage models for document classification and ranking. In Proceedings of ECIR- 01, 23rd European Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research (Darmstadt, Germany, 2001).]]Google Scholar
- DIAZ ESTEBAN, A., DE BUENAGA RODRIGUEZ, M., URENA LOPEZ,L.A.,AND GARCIA VEGA, M. 1998. Integrating linguistic resources in an uniform way for text classification tasks. In Proceedings of LREC-98, 1st International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Grenada, Spain, 1998), 1197-1204.]]Google Scholar
- DOMINGOS,P.AND PAZZANI, M. J. 1997. On the the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Mach. Learn. 29, 2-3, 103-130.]] Google Scholar
- DRUCKER, H., VAPNIK,V.,AND WU, D. 1999. Automatic text categorization and its applications to text retrieval. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 10,5, 1048-1054.]]Google Scholar
- DUMAIS,S.T.AND CHEN, H. 2000. Hierarchical classification of Web content. In Proceedings of SIGIR-00, 23rd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Athens, Greece, 2000), 256-263.]] Google Scholar
- DUMAIS,S.T.,PLATT, J., HECKERMAN,D.,AND SAHAMI, M. 1998. Inductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization. In Proceedings of CIKM-98, 7th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Man-agement (Bethesda, MD, 1998), 148-155.]] Google Scholar
- ESCUDERO, G., MARQUEZ, L., AND RIGAU, G. 2000. Boosting applied to word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of ECML-00, 11th European Conference on Machine Learning (Barcelona, Spain, 2000), 129-141.]] Google Scholar
- FIELD, B. 1975. Towards automatic indexing: automatic assignment of controlled-language indexing and classification from free indexing. J. Document. 31, 4, 246-265.]]Google Scholar
- FORSYTH, R. S. 1999. New directions in text categorization. In Causal Models and Intelligent Data Management, A. Gammerman, ed. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 151-185.]]Google Scholar
- FRASCONI, P., SODA,G.,AND VULLO, A. 2002. Text categorization for multi-page documents: A hybrid naive Bayes HMM approach. J. Intell. Inform. Syst. 18, 2/3 (March-May), 195-217.]] Google Scholar
- FUHR, N. 1985. Aprobabilistic model of dictionarybased automatic indexing. In Proceedings of RIAO-85, 1st International Conference "Re-cherche d'Information Assistee par Ordinateur" (Grenoble, France, 1985), 207-216.]]Google Scholar
- FUHR, N. 1989. Models for retrieval with probabilistic indexing. Inform. Process. Man. 25,1,55- 72.]] Google Scholar
- FUHR,N.AND BUCKLEY, C. 1991. A probabilistic learning approach for document indexing. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 9, 3, 223-248.]] Google Scholar
- FUHR, N., HARTMANN, S., KNORZ, G., LUSTIG,G., SCHWANTNER, M., AND TZERAS, K. 1991. AIR/X"a rule-based multistage indexing system for large subject fields. In Proceedings of RIAO-91, 3rd International Conference "Recherche d'Information Assistee par Ordina-teur" (Barcelona, Spain, 1991), 606-623.]]Google Scholar
- FUHR,N.AND KNORZ, G. 1984. Retrieval test evaluation of a rule-based automated indexing (AIR/PHYS). In Proceedings of SIGIR-84, 7th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Cambridge, UK, 1984), 391-408.]] Google Scholar
- FUHR,N.AND PFEIFER, U. 1994. Probabilistic information retrieval as combination of abstraction inductive learning and probabilistic assumptions. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 12,1, 92-115.]] Google Scholar
- FURNKRANZ, J. 1999. Exploiting structural information for text classification on the WWW. In Proceedings of IDA-99, 3rd Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999), 487-497.]] Google Scholar
- GALAVOTTI, L., SEBASTIANI,F.,AND SIMI, M. 2000. Experiments on the use of feature selection and negative evidence in automated text categorization. In Proceedings of ECDL-00, 4th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (Lisbon, Portugal, 2000), 59-68.]] Google Scholar
- GALE, W. A., CHURCH,K.W.,AND YAROWSKY, D. 1993. A method for disambiguating word senses in a large corpus. Comput. Human. 26, 5, 415-439.]]Google Scholar
- GOVERT, N., LALMAS, M., AND FUHR, N. 1999. A probabillistic description-oriented approach for categorising Web documents. In Proceedings of CIKM-99, 8th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Kansas City, MO, 1999), 475-482.]] Google Scholar
- GRAY,W.A.AND HARLEY, A. J. 1971. Computerassisted indexing. Inform. Storage Retrieval 7, 4, 167-174.]]Google Scholar
- GUTHRIE, L., WALKER, E., AND GUTHRIE, J. A. 1994. Document classification by machine: theory and practice. In Proceedings of COLING-94, 15th International Conference on Computational Lin-guistics (Kyoto, Japan, 1994), 1059-1063.]] Google Scholar
- HAYES,P.J.,ANDERSEN, P. M., NIRENBURG,I.B., AND SCHMANDT, L. M. 1990. Tcs: a shell for content-based text categorization. In Proceedings of CAIA-90, 6th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications (Santa Barbara, CA, 1990), 320-326.]] Google Scholar
- HEAPS, H. 1973. A theory of relevance for automatic document classification. Inform. Control 22, 3, 268-278.]]Google Scholar
- HERSH, W., BUCKLEY, C., LEONE,T.,AND HICKMAN,D. 1994. OHSUMED: an interactive retrieval evaluation and new large text collection for research. In Proceedings of SIGIR-94, 17th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Dublin, Ireland, 1994), 192-201.]] Google Scholar
- HULL, D. A. 1994. Improving text retrieval for the routing problem using latent semantic indexing. In Proceedings of SIGIR-94, 17th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Dublin, Ireland, 1994), 282-289.]] Google Scholar
- HULL, D. A., PEDERSEN,J.O.,AND SCHUTZE, H. 1996. Method combination for document filtering. In Proceedings of SIGIR-96, 19th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Zuuml;rich, Switzerland, 1996), 279-288.]] Google Scholar
- ITTNER,D.J.,LEWIS,D.D.,AND AHN, D. D. 1995. Text categorization of low quality images. In Proceedings of SDAIR-95, 4th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval (Las Vegas, NV, 1995), 301-315.]]Google Scholar
- IWAYAMA,M.AND TOKUNAGA, T. 1995. Cluster-based text categorization: a comparison of category search strategies. In Proceedings of SIGIR-95, 18th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Seattle, WA, 1995), 273-281.]] Google Scholar
- IYER,R.D.,LEWIS,D.D.,SCHAPIRE, R. E., SINGER,Y., AND SINGHAL, A. 2000. Boosting for document routing. In Proceedings of CIKM-00, 9th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (McLean, VA, 2000), 70-77.]] Google Scholar
- JOACHIMS, T. 1997. A probabilistic analysis of the Rocchio algorithm with TFIDF for text categorization. In Proceedings of ICML-97, 14th International Conference on Machine Learning (Nashville, TN, 1997), 143-151.]] Google Scholar
- JOACHIMS, T. 1998. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (Chemnitz, Germany, 1998), 137-142.]] Google Scholar
- JOACHIMS, T. 1999. Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. In Proceedings of ICML-99, 16th International Conference on Machine Learning (Bled, Slovenia, 1999), 200-209.]] Google Scholar
- JOACHIMS,T.AND SEBASTIANI, F. 2002. Guest editors' introduction to the special issue on automated text categorization. J. Intell. Inform. Syst. 18, 2/3 (March-May), 103-105.]] Google Scholar
- JOHN, G. H., KOHAVI, R., AND PFLEGER, K. 1994. Irrelevant features and the subset selection problem. In Proceedings of ICML-94, 11th International Conference on Machine Learning (New Brunswick, NJ, 1994), 121-129.]]Google Scholar
- JUNKER,M.AND ABECKER, A. 1997. Exploiting thesaurus knowledge in rule induction for text classification. In Proceedings of RANLP-97, 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria, 1997), 202-207.]]Google Scholar
- JUNKER,M.AND HOCH, R. 1998. An experimental evaluation of OCR text representations for learning document classifiers. Internat. J. Document Analysis and Recognition 1, 2, 116-122.]]Google Scholar
- KESSLER, B., NUNBERG,G.,AND SCHUTZE, H. 1997. Automatic detection of text genre. In Proceedings of ACL-97, 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Madrid, Spain, 1997), 32-38.]] Google Scholar
- KIM, Y.-H., HAHN, S.-Y., AND ZHANG, B.-T. 2000. Text filtering by boosting naive Bayes classifiers. In Proceedings of SIGIR-00, 23rd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Athens, Greece, 2000), 168-175.]] Google Scholar
- KLINKENBERG,R.AND JOACHIMS, T. 2000. Detecting concept drift with support vector machines. In Proceedings of ICML-00, 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (Stanford, CA, 2000), 487-494.]] Google Scholar
- KNIGHT, K. 1999. Mining online text. Commun. ACM 42, 11, 58-61.]] Google Scholar
- KNORZ, G. 1982. A decision theory approach to optimal automated indexing. In Proceedings of SIGIR-82, 5th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Berlin, Germany, 1982), 174-193.]] Google Scholar
- KOLLER,D.AND SAHAMI, M. 1997. Hierarchically classifying documents using very few words. In Proceedings of ICML-97, 14th International Conference on Machine Learning (Nashville, TN, 1997), 170-178.]] Google Scholar
- KORFHAGE, R. R. 1997. Information Storage and Retrieval. Wiley Computer Publishing, New York, NY.]] Google Scholar
- LAM,S.L.AND LEE, D. L. 1999. Feature reduction for neural network based text categorization. In Proceedings of DASFAA-99, 6th IEEE International Conference on Database Advanced Systems for Advanced Application (Hsinchu, Taiwan, 1999), 195-202.]] Google Scholar
- LAM,W.AND HO, C. Y. 1998. Using a generalized instance set for automatic text categorization. In Proceedings of SIGIR-98, 21st ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Melbourne, Australia, 1998), 81-89.]] Google Scholar
- LAM, W., LOW,K.F.,AND HO, C. Y. 1997. Using a Bayesian network induction approach for text categorization. In Proceedings of IJCAI-97, 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Nagoya, Japan, 1997), 745-750.]]Google Scholar
- LAM, W., RUIZ,M.E.,AND SRINIVASAN, P. 1999. Automatic text categorization and its applications to text retrieval. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Engin. 11, 6, 865-879.]] Google Scholar
- LANG, K. 1995. NEWSWEEDER: learning to filter netnews. In Proceedings of ICML-95, 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (Lake Tahoe, CA, 1995), 331-339.]]Google Scholar
- LARKEY, L. S. 1998. Automatic essay grading using text categorization techniques. In Proceedings of SIGIR-98, 21st ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Melbourne, Australia, 1998), 90-95.]] Google Scholar
- LARKEY, L. S. 1999. A patent search and classification system. In Proceedings of DL-99, 4th ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (Berkeley, CA, 1999), 179-187.]] Google Scholar
- LARKEY,L.S.AND CROFT, W. B. 1996. Combining classifiers in text categorization. In Proceedings of SIGIR-96, 19th ACMInternational Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Z~rich, Switzerland, 1996), 289-297.]] Google Scholar
- LEWIS, D. D. 1992a. An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task. In Proceedings of SIGIR-92, 15th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Copenhagen, Denmark, 1992), 37-50.]] Google Scholar
- LEWIS, D. D. 1992b. Representation and Learning in Information Retrieval. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.]] Google Scholar
- LEWIS, D. D. 1995a. Evaluating and optmizing autonomous text classification systems. In Proceedings of SIGIR-95, 18th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Seattle, WA, 1995), 246- 254.]] Google Scholar
- LEWIS, D. D. 1995b. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers: corrigendum and additional data. SIGIR Forum 29, 2, 13-19.]] Google Scholar
- LEWIS, D. D. 1995c. The TREC-4 filtering track: description and analysis. In Proceedings of TREC-4, 4th Text Retrieval Conference (Gaithersburg, MD, 1995), 165-180.]]Google Scholar
- LEWIS, D. D. 1998. Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (Chemnitz, Germany, 1998), 4-15.]] Google Scholar
- LEWIS,D.D.AND CATLETT, J. 1994. Heterogeneous uncertainty sampling for supervised learning. In Proceedings of ICML-94, 11th International Conference on Machine Learning (New Brunswick, NJ, 1994), 148-156.]]Google Scholar
- LEWIS,D.D.AND GALE, W. A. 1994. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In Proceedings of SIGIR-94, 17th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Dublin, Ireland, 1994), 3-12. See also Lewis {1995b}.]] Google Scholar
- LEWIS,D.D.AND HAYES, P. J. 1994. Guest editorial for the special issue on text categorization. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 12, 3, 231.]]Google Scholar
- LEWIS,D.D.AND RINGUETTE, M. 1994. A comparison of two learning algorithms for text categorization. In Proceedings of SDAIR-94, 3rd Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval (Las Vegas, NV, 1994), 81-93.]]Google Scholar
- LEWIS,D.D.,SCHAPIRE, R. E., CALLAN,J.P.,AND PAPKA, R. 1996. Training algorithms for linear text classifiers. In Proceedings of SIGIR-96, 19th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Zurich, Switzerland, 1996), 298-306.]] Google Scholar
- LI,H.AND YAMANISHI, K. 1999. Text classification using ESC-based stochastic decision lists. In Proceedings of CIKM-99, 8th ACMInternational Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Kansas City, MO, 1999), 122-130.]] Google Scholar
- LI,Y.H.AND JAIN, A. K. 1998. Classification of text documents. Comput. J. 41, 8, 537-546.]]Google Scholar
- LIDDY, E. D., PAIK,W.,AND YU, E. S. 1994. Text categorization for multiple users based on semantic features from a machine-readable dictionary. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 12, 3, 278-295.]] Google Scholar
- LIERE,R.AND TADEPALLI, P. 1997. Active learning with committees for text categorization. In Proceedings of AAAI-97, 14th Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (Providence, RI, 1997), 591-596.]]Google Scholar
- LIM, J. H. 1999. Learnable visual keywords for image classification. In Proceedings of DL-99, 4th ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (Berkeley, CA, 1999), 139-145.]] Google Scholar
- MANNING,C.AND SCHUTZE, H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.]] Google Scholar
- MARON, M. 1961. Automatic indexing: an experimental inquiry. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 8,3, 404-417.]] Google Scholar
- MASAND, B. 1994. Optimising confidence of text classification by evolution of symbolic expressions. In Advances in Genetic Programming, K. E. Kinnear, ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Chapter 21, 459-476.]] Google Scholar
- MASAND, B., LINOFF,G.,AND WALTZ, D. 1992. Classifying news stories using memory-based reasoning. In Proceedings of SIGIR-92, 15th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Copenhagen, Denmark, 1992), 59-65.]] Google Scholar
- MCCALLUM,A.K.AND NIGAM, K. 1998. Employing EM in pool-based active learning for text classification. In Proceedings of ICML-98, 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (Madison, WI, 1998), 350-358.]] Google Scholar
- MCCALLUM, A. K., ROSENFELD, R., MITCHELL,T.M.,AND NG, A. Y. 1998. Improving text classification by shrinkage in a hierarchy of classes. In Proceedings of ICML-98, 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (Madison, WI, 1998), 359-367.]] Google Scholar
- MERKL, D. 1998. Text classification with selforganizing maps: Some lessons learned. Neurocomputing 21, 1/3, 61-77.]]Google Scholar
- MITCHELL, T. M. 1996. Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.]] Google Scholar
- MLADENIC, D. 1998. Feature subset selection in text learning. In Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (Chemnitz, Germany, 1998), 95-100.]] Google Scholar
- MLADENIC,D.AND GROBELNIK, M. 1998. Word sequences as features in text-learning. In Proceedings of ERK-98, the Seventh Electrotechnical and Computer Science Conference (Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1998), 145-148.]]Google Scholar
- MOULINIER,I.AND GANASCIA, J.-G. 1996. Applying an existing machine learning algorithm to text categorization. In Connectionist, Statistical, and Symbolic Approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing, S. Wermter, E. Riloff, and G. Schaler, eds. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 343-354.]] Google Scholar
- MOULINIER, I., RASKINIS,G.,AND GANASCIA, J.-G. 1996. Text categorization: a symbolic approach. In Proceedings of SDAIR-96, 5th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval (Las Vegas, NV, 1996), 87-99.]]Google Scholar
- MYERS, K., KEARNS, M., SINGH,S.,AND WALKER, M. A. 2000. A boosting approach to topic spotting on subdialogues. In Proceedings of ICML-00, 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (Stanford, CA, 2000), 655- 662.]] Google Scholar
- NG,H.T.,GOH,W.B.,AND LOW, K. L. 1997. Feature selection, perceptron learning, and a usability case study for text categorization. In Proceedings of SIGIR-97, 20th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Philadelphia, PA, 1997), 67-73.]] Google Scholar
- NIGAM, K., MCCALLUM, A. K., THRUN,S.,AND MITCHELL, T. M. 2000. Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Mach. Learn. 39, 2/3, 103-134.]] Google Scholar
- OH, H.-J., MYAENG,S.H.,AND LEE, M.-H. 2000. A practical hypertext categorization method using links and incrementally available class information. In Proceedings of SIGIR-00, 23rd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Athens, Greece, 2000), 264-271.]] Google Scholar
- PAZIENZA, M. T., ed. 1997. Information Extraction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1299. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.]] Google Scholar
- RILOFF. E. 1995. Little words can make a big difference for text classification. In Proceedings of SIGIR-95, 18th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Seattle, WA, 1995), 130-136.]] Google Scholar
- RILOFF,E.AND LEHNERT, W. 1994. Information extraction as a basis for high-precision text classification. ACMTrans. Inform. Syst. 12, 3, 296-333.]] Google Scholar
- ROBERTSON,S.E.AND HARDING, P. 1984. Probabilistic automatic indexing by learning from human indexers. J. Document. 40, 4, 264-270.]]Google Scholar
- ROBERTSON,S.E.AND SPARCK JONES, K. 1976. Relevance weighting of search terms. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 27, 3, 129-146. Also reprinted in Willett {1988}, pp. 143-160.]]Google Scholar
- ROTH, D. 1998. Learning to resolve natural language ambiguities: a unified approach. In Proceedings of AAAI-98, 15th Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (Madison, WI, 1998), 806-813.]] Google Scholar
- RUIZ,M.E.AND SRINIVASAN, P. 1999. Hierarchical neural networks for text categorization. In Proceedings of SIGIR-99, 22nd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Berkeley, CA, 1999), 281-282.]] Google Scholar
- SABLE,C.L.AND HATZIVASSILOGLOU, V. 2000. Textbased approaches for non-topical image categorization. Internat. J. Dig. Libr. 3, 3, 261-275.]]Google Scholar
- SALTON,G.AND BUCKLEY, C. 1988. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inform. Process. Man. 24, 5, 513-523. Also reprinted in Sparck Jones and Willett {1997}, pp. 323-328.]] Google Scholar
- SALTON, G., WONG, A., AND YANG, C. 1975. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18, 11, 613-620. Also reprinted in Sparck Jones and Willett {1997}, pp. 273-280.]] Google Scholar
- SARACEVIC, T. 1975. Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 26, 6, 321-343. Also reprinted in Sparck Jones and Willett {1997}, pp. 143-165.]] Google Scholar
- SCHAPIRE,R.E.AND SINGER, Y. 2000. BoosTexter: a boosting-based system for text categorization. Mach. Learn. 39, 2/3, 135-168.]] Google Scholar
- SCHAPIRE, R. E., SINGER,Y.,AND SINGHAL, A. 1998. Boosting and Rocchio applied to text filtering. In Proceedings of SIGIR-98, 21st ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Melbourne, Australia, 1998), 215-223.]] Google Scholar
- SCHUTZE, H. 1998. Automatic word sense discrimination. Computat. Ling. 24, 1, 97-124.]] Google Scholar
- SCHUTZE, H., HULL,D.A.,AND PEDERSEN, J. O. 1995. A comparison of classifiers and document representations for the routing problem. In Proceedings of SIGIR-95, 18th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Seattle, WA, 1995), 229-237.]] Google Scholar
- SCOTT,S.AND MATWIN, S. 1999. Feature engineering for text classification. In Proceedings of ICML-99, 16th International Conference on Machine Learning (Bled, Slovenia, 1999), 379-388.]] Google Scholar
- SEBASTIANI, F., SPERDUTI, A., AND VALDAMBRINI,N. 2000. An improved boosting algorithm and its application to automated text categorization. In Proceedings of CIKM-00, 9th ACMInternational Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (McLean, VA, 2000), 78-85.]] Google Scholar
- SINGHAL, A., MITRA, M., AND BUCKLEY, C. 1997. Learning routing queries in a query zone. In Proceedings of SIGIR-97, 20th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Philadelphia, PA, 1997), 25-32.]] Google Scholar
- SINGHAL, A., SALTON, G., MITRA, M., AND BUCKLEY, C. 1996. Document length normalization. Inform. Process. Man. 32, 5, 619-633.]] Google Scholar
- SLONIM,N.AND TISHBY, N. 2001. The power of word clusters for text classification. In Proceedings of ECIR-01, 23rd European Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research (Darmstadt, Germany, 2001).]]Google Scholar
- SPARCK JONES,K.AND WILLETT, P., eds. 1997. Readings in Information Retrieval. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.]] Google Scholar
- TAIRA,H.AND HARUNO, M. 1999. Feature selection in SVM text categorization. In Proceedings of AAAI-99, 16th Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (Orlando, FL, 1999), 480-486.]] Google Scholar
- TAURITZ, D. R., KOK,J.N.,AND SPRINKHUIZEN-KUYPER, I. G. 2000. Adaptive information filtering using evolutionary computation. Inform. Sci. 122, 2-4, 121-140.]] Google Scholar
- TUMER,K.AND GHOSH, J. 1996. Error correlation and error reduction in ensemble classifiers. Connection Sci. 8, 3-4, 385-403.]]Google Scholar
- TZERAS,K.AND HARTMANN, S. 1993. Automatic indexing based on Bayesian inference networks. In Proceedings of SIGIR-93, 16th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), 22-34.]] Google Scholar
- VAN RIJSBERGEN, C. J. 1977. A theoretical basis for the use of co-occurrence data in information retrieval. J. Document. 33, 2, 106-119.]]Google Scholar
- VAN RIJSBERGEN, C. J. 1979. Information Retrieval, 2nd ed. Butterworths, London, UK. Available at http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Keith.]] Google Scholar
- WEIGEND,A.S.,WIENER,E.D.,AND PEDERSEN,J.O. 1999. Exploiting hierarchy in text catagorization. Inform. Retr. 1, 3, 193-216.]] Google Scholar
- WEISS, S. M., APT~, C., DAMERAU,F.J.,JOHNSON,D. E., OLES,F.J.,GOETZ,T.,AND HAMPP, T. 1999. Maximizing text-mining performance. IEEE Intell. Syst. 14, 4, 63-69.]] Google Scholar
- WIENER,E.D.,PEDERSEN,J.O.,AND WEIGEND,A.S. 1995. A neural network approach to topic spotting. In Proceedings of SDAIR-95, 4th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval (Las Vegas, NV, 1995), 317-332.]]Google Scholar
- WILLETT, P., ed. 1988. Document Retrieval Systems. Taylor Graham, London, UK.]] Google Scholar
- WONG,J.W.,KAN, W.-K., AND YOUNG, G. H. 1996. ACTION: automatic classification for full-text documents. SIGIR Forum 30, 1, 26-41.]] Google Scholar
- YANG, Y. 1994. Expert network: effective and efficient learning from human decisions in text categorisation and retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR-94, 17th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Dublin, Ireland, 1994), 13-22.]] Google Scholar
- YANG, Y. 1995. Noise reduction in a statistical approach to text categorization. In Proceedings of SIGIR-95, 18th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Seattle, WA, 1995), 256-263.]] Google Scholar
- YANG, Y. 1999. An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Inform. Retr. 1, 1-2, 69-90.]] Google Scholar
- YANG,Y.AND CHUTE, C. G. 1994. An example-based mapping method for text categorization and retrieval. ACMTrans. Inform. Syst. 12, 3, 252-277.]] Google Scholar
- YANG,Y.AND LIU, X. 1999. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In Proceedings of SIGIR-99, 22nd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Berkeley, CA, 1999), 42-49.]] Google Scholar
- YANG,Y.AND PEDERSEN, J. O. 1997. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proceedings of ICML-97, 14th International Conference on Machine Learning (Nashville, TN, 1997), 412-420.]] Google Scholar
- YANG, Y., SLATTERY,S.,AND GHANI, R. 2002. A study of approaches to hypertext categorization. J. Intell. Inform. Syst. 18, 2/3 (March-May), 219-241.]] Google Scholar
- YU,K.L.AND LAM, W. 1998. A new on-line learning algorithm for adaptive text filtering. In Proceedings of CIKM-98, 7th ACMInternational Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Bethesda, MD, 1998), 156-160.]] Google Scholar
Recommendations
Chinese text classification by the Naïve Bayes Classifier and the associative classifier with multiple confidence threshold values
Each type of classifier has its own advantages as well as certain shortcomings. In this paper, we take the advantages of the associative classifier and the Naive Bayes Classifier to make up the shortcomings of each other, thus improving the accuracy of ...
An adaptive k-nearest neighbor text categorization strategy
k is the most important parameter in a text categorization system based on the k-nearest neighbor algorithm (kNN). To classify a new document, the k-nearest documents in the training set are determined first. The prediction of categories for this ...
Comments