skip to main content
10.1145/503376.503442acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Statistical profiles of highly-rated web sites

Published:20 April 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

We are creating an interactive tool to help non-professional web site builders create high quality designs. We have previously reported that quantitative measures of web page structure can predict whether a site will be highly or poorly rated by experts, with accuracies ranging from 67--80%. In this paper we extend that work in several ways. First, we compute a much larger set of measures (157 versus 11), over a much larger collection of pages (5300 vs. 1900), achieving much higher overall accuracy (94% on average) when contrasting good, average, and poor pages. Second, we introduce new classes of measures that can make assessments at the site level and according to page type (home page, content page, etc.). Finally, we create statistical profiles of good sites, and apply them to an existing design, showing how that design can be changed to better match high-quality designs

References

  1. Neil Bowers. Weblint: quality assurance for the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the Fifth International World Wide Web Conference, Paris, France, May 1996. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Giorgio Brajnik. Automatic web usability evaluation: Where is the limit? In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human Factors & the Web, Austin, TX, June 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Leo Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, U.S.A., 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CAST. Bobby. http://www.cast.org/bobby/, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ed H. Chi, Peter Pirolli, and James Pitkow. The scent of a site: A system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a web site. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 161--168, The Hague, The Netherlands, April 2000. New York, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Melody Y. Ivory. An Empirical Foundation for Automated Web Interface Evaluation. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Computer Science Division, 2001. In preparation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Melody Y. Ivory, Rashmi R. Sinha, and Marti A. Hearst. Preliminary findings on quantitative measures for distinguishing highly rated information-centric web pages. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human Factors & the Web, Austin, TX, June 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Melody Y. Ivory, Rashmi R. Sinha, and Marti A. Hearst. Empirically validated web page design metrics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, volume 1, pages 53--60, Seattle, WA, March 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Kim and B. J. Fogg. World wide web credibility: What effects do advertisements and typos have on the perceived credibility of web page information? Unpublished thesis, Stanford University, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mark W. Newman and James A. Landay. Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: A sketch of web site design practice. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems: DIS 2000, Automatic Support in Design and Use, pages 263--274, August 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jakob Nielsen. Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Julie Ratner, Eric M. Grose, and Chris Forsythe. Characterization and assessment of HTML style guides. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, volume 2, pages 115--116, Vancouver, Canada, April 1996. New York, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nathan Shedroff. Experience Design 1. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rashmi Sinha, Marti Hearst, and Melody Ivory. Content or graphics? an empirical analysis of criteria for award-winning websites. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Human Factors & the Web, Madison, WI, June 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jared M. Spool, Tara Scanlon, Will Schroeder, Carolyn Snyder, and Terri DeAngelo. Web Site Usability: A Designer's Guide. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. SPSS Inc. SPSS Base 10.0 Applications Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc., 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. The International Academy of Arts and Sciences. The webby awards 2000 judging criteria. http://www.webbyawards.com/judging/criteria.html, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yin Leng Theng and Gil Marsden. Authoring tools: Towards continuous usability testing of web documents. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Hypermedia Development, Pittsburg, PA, June 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Web Criteria. Max, and the objective measurement of web sites. http://www.webcriteria.com, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Statistical profiles of highly-rated web sites

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2002
            478 pages
            ISBN:1581134533
            DOI:10.1145/503376
            • Conference Chair:
            • Dennis Wixon

            Copyright © 2002 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 April 2002

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '02 Paper Acceptance Rate61of414submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader