Improving focus targeting in interactive fisheye views

ABSTRACT

Fisheye views allow people to see both a focus region and the surrounding context in the same window. However, the magnification effects of the fisheye lens can cause several problems for users. One of these is focus-targeting, where a user moves the focus to a new location. Magnification makes focus-targeting difficult because objects appear to move as the focus point approaches them. This paper examines how the distortion of a fisheye view affects focus-targeting performance, and present a technique called speed-coupled flattening (SCF) as a way to improve focus targeting in distortion-oriented views. SCF dynamically reduces the distortion level of a fisheye based on pointer velocity and acceleration. In an experiment, the technique resulted in significant reductions in both targeting time and targeting errors. By adjusting distortion based on the user's activity, we can improve usability without requiring the user to manipulate any additional view controls

References

1. Gutwin, C. (2002) Speed-Coupled Flattening Video Figures. Video Proceedings of ACM CHI 2002; also available at: hci.usask.ca/publications/2002/flatten-chi/
2. Carpendale, M. S. T., Cowperthwaite, D. J., and Fracchia, F. D. (1997) Extending Distortion Viewing Techniques from 2D to 3D Data, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol. 17(4), 42--51.
3. International Organization for Standardization (1998) ISO/TC 159/SC4/WG3 N147: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals - Part 9 - Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, 1998.
4. Lamping, J., Rao, R., and Pirolli, P. (1995) A Focus+Context Technique Based on Hyperbolic Geometry for Visualizing Large Hierarchies. Proceedings of ACM CHI 1995, 401--408.
5. Leung, Y., and Apperley, M. (1994) A Review and Taxonomy of Distortion-Oriented Presentation Techniques, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1 (2), 1994, 126--160.
6. MacKenzie, I. S., (1992) Movement Time Prediction in Human-Computer Interfaces. Proc. Graphics Interface '92, Morgan Kaufmann, 140--150.
7. MacKenzie, I. S., Kauppinen, T., & Silfverberg, M. (2001). Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001, 9--16.
8. Rauschenbach, U., Weinkauf, T., and Schumann, H. (2000) Interactive focus and context display of large raster images, Proc. International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Interactive Digital Media, 2000.
9. Risden, K., Czerwinski, M., Munzner, T., and Cook, D. (2000) An initial examination of ease of use for 2D and 3D information visualizations of web content. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 53, No. 5, November 2000, pp 695--714.
10. Robertson, G., and Mackinlay, J. (1993) The Document Lens, Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 1993, 101--108.
11. Sarkar, M., & Brown, M. (1992) Graphical Fisheye Views of Graphs. Proceedings of ACM CHI'92, 83--91.
12. Smith, R., Hixon, R., and Horan, B. (1998), Supporting Flexible Roles in a Shared Space, Proceedings of ACM CSCW'98, 197--206.
13. Storey, M.-A.D., Fracchia, F.D., and Muller, H. A. (1999), Customizing A Fisheye View Algorithm to Preserve the Mental Map, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 10, 245--267, 1999.
14. Tan, D.S., Robertson, G.G, & Czerwinski, M. (2001). Exploring 3D Navigation: Combining Speed-coupled Flying with Orbiting. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001, 498--505.
15. Ware, C., and Lewis, M. (1995) The DragMag Image Magnifier. Video Proceedings of ACM CHI'95, 1995, vol. 2, p.407--408.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Artificial intelligence

    • Computer vision

      • Computer vision tasks

        • Video summarization

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interactive systems and tools

  • Interaction design