Abstract
Explosing common misuses of the subsumption relationship and the formal basis for why they are wrong.
- 1 Guarino, N. and Welty, C. Identity and subsumption. In, R., Green, Ed. Semantic Relations. Kluwer, 2001.]]Google Scholar
- 2 Guarino, N. and Welty, C. Identity, unity, and individuality: Towards a formal toolkit for ontological analysis. In Proceedings of ECAI-2000: The European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IOS Press, Berlin, Germany, 2000.]]Google Scholar
- 3 Guarino, N. and Welty, C. A formal ontology of properties. In R. Dieng, Ed., Proceedings of 12th Int. Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Springer Verlag, 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Hayes, P.J. Naive physics I: Ontology for liquids. In J.R. Hobbs and R. C. Moore, Eds. Formal Theories of the Commonsense World. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1985, pp. 71-108).]]Google Scholar
- 5 Miller, G.A. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Commun. ACM, 38, 11 (Nov. 1995), 39-41.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 McCarthy, J. Circumscription "A form of non-monotonic reasoning. Art. Int. 5, 13 (1980), 27-39.]]Google Scholar
- 7 Nirenburg, S., Carbonell, J., Tomita, M., and Goodman, K. Machine Translation: A Knowledge-Based Approach. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Sant Mateo, NJ, 1992.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8 Quine, W.V.O. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University ress, New York, London, 1969.]]Google Scholar
- 9 Smith, B. and Welty, C. Formal Ontology and Information Systems. ACM Press, 2001.]]Google Scholar
- 10 Simons, P. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford,1987.]]Google Scholar
- 11 Sowa, J.F. Conceptual Structures. Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Reading. Addison-Wesley, MA, 1984.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12 Storey, V.C. Understanding semantic relationships. Very Large Databases J. 2 (1993), 455-488.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean
Recommendations
Ontology enrichment by discovering multi-relational association rules from ontological knowledge bases
SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied ComputingIn the Semantic Web context, OWL ontologies represent the conceptualization of domains of interest while the corresponding assertional knowledge is given by the heterogeneous Web resources referring to them. Being strongly decoupled, ontologies and ...
An ontological representation of public services: models, technologies and use cases
This paper presents our effort to "ontologize" a conceptual public service model in order to express in a formal way domain specific semantics and create a reusable service ontology for eGovernment applications. The conceptual model we have used comes ...
Comments