A framework for unifying presentation space

ABSTRACT

Making effective use of the available display space has long been a fundamental issue in user interface design. We live in a time of rapid advances in available CPU power and memory. However, the common sizes of our computational display spaces have only minimally increased or in some cases, such as hand held devices, actually decreased. In addition, the size and scope of the information spaces we wish to explore are also expanding. Representing vast amounts of information on our relatively small screens has become increasingly problematic and has been associated with problems in navigation, interpretation and recognition. User interface research has proposed several differing presentation approaches to address these problems. These methods create displays that vary considerably, visually and algorithmically. We present a unified framework that provides a way of relating seemingly distinct methods, facilitating the inclusion of more than one presentation method in a single interface. Furthermore, it supports extrapolation between the presentation methods it describes. Of particular interest are the presentation possibilities that exist in the ranges between various distortion presentations, magnified insets and detail-in-context presentations, and between detail-in-context presentations and a full-zooming environment. This unified framework offers a geometric presentation library in which presentation variations are available independently of the mode of graphic representation. The intention is to promote the ease of exploration and experimentation into the use of varied presentation combinations.

References

1. 1.L. Bartram, A. Ho, J. Dill and F. Henigman. The continuous zoom: A constrained fisheye technique for viewing and navigating large information spaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology: UIST'95, pp. 207-215, 1995. ACM Press.
2. 2.M. S. T. Carpendale, D. J. Cowperthwaite and F. D. Fracchia. 3-Dimensional pliable surfaces: For effective presentation of visual information. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology: UIST'95, pp. 217-226, 1995. ACM Press.
3. 3.M. S. T. Carpendale, D. J. Cowperthwaite, F. D. Fracchia and T Shermer. Graph Folding: Extending detail and context viewing into a tool for subgraph comparisons. In Symposium on Graph Drawing, GD'95, pp. 127-139, 1995, Springer-Verlag.
4. 4.M. S. T. Carpendale, D. J. Cowperthwaite, M. Tigges, A. Fall and F. D. Fracchia. The Tardis: A Visual Exploration Environment for Landscape Dynamics. In SPIE, Conference on Visual Data Exploration and Analysis V1, 1999.
5. 5.M. S. T. Carpendale and R. Xing. Examining Edge CongestiorL In Conference Companion of CHI '01 Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 115-116, 2001.
6. 6.E. Chi and J. T. Riedl. An operator interaction framework for visualization systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Information Visualization, pp. 19-25, Oct 1998. IEEE Computer Society Press.
7. 7.M. C. Chuah, S. F. Roth, J. Mattis and J. Kolojejchick. SDM: Malleable information graphics. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Information Visualization, pp. 36-42, Oct 1995. IEEE Computer Society Press.
8. 8.G. W. Furnas. Generalized fisheye views. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human- Computer Interaction: CHI'86, pp. 16-23, 1986. ACM Press.
9. 9.G. W. Furnas, and B. B. Bederson. Space-scale diagrams: Understanding multiscale interfaces. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CH1"95, ACM Press, pp. 234-241, 1995
10. 10.J. C. Hollands, T. T. Carey and C. A. McCann. Presenting a graphical network: A comparison of performance using fisheye and scrolling views. In Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems, pp. 313-320. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1989.
11. 11.C. Iturriaga and A. Lubiw. Elastic labels: the twoaxis case. In Proceedings of the fifth Symposium on Graph Drawing, pp. 181-192, September 1997. Springer- Verlag.
12. 12.E. Kandogan and B. Shneiderman. Elastic windows: Improved spatial layout and rapid multiple window operations. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces: AVI'96, pp. 250-257, 1996, ACM Press.
13. 13.A. Keahey and E. Robertson. Techniques for nonlinear magnification transformations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Information Visualization, pp. 38-45, Oct 1996. IEEE Computer Society Press.
14. 14.A. Keahey and E. Robertson. Nonlinear magnification fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Information Visualization, pp. 51-58, Oct 1997. IEEE Computer Society Press.
15. 15.J. Lamping, R. Rao and P. Pirolli. A focus and context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems: CHI'95, pp. 401-408, May 1995. ACM Press.
16. 16.Y. K. Leung and M. D. Apperley. A review and taxonomy of distortion-oriented presentation techniques. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Inteaction, 1(2):126-160, 1994, ACM Press.
17. 17.J. D. Mackinlay, G. G. Robertson, and S. K. Card. The perspective wall: Detail and context smoothly integratec{ In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI'91, pp. 173-180, April 1991. ACM Press.
18. 18.K. Misue and K. Sugiyama. Multi-viewpoint perspective display methods: Formulation and application to compound digraphs. In Human Aspects in Computing: design and Use of Interactive Systems and Information Management, pp. 834-838. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991.
19. 19.E. G. Noik. A space of presentation emphasis techniques for visualizing graphs. In Graphics Interface '94, pp. 225-233, 1994.
20. 20.G. Robertson and J. D. Mackinlay. The document lens. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology: UIST'93, pp. 101- 108, November 1993. ACM Press.
21. 21.M. Sarkar and M. H. Brown. Graphical fisheye views. Communications of the ACM, 37(12):73-84, 1994.
22. 22.M. Sarkar, S. Snibbe, O. J. Tversky, and S. P. Reiss. Stretching the rubber sheet: A metaphor for viewing large layouts on small screens. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology: UIST'93, pp. 81-91, November 1993. ACM Press.
23. 23.M. Sarkar and S. P. Reiss. Manipulating screen space with stretchtools: Visualizing large structures on small screen. Technical Report CS-92-42, Brown University, 1992.
24. 24.D. Schaffer, Z. Zuo, S. Greenberg, L. Bartram, J. Dill, S. Dubs, and M. Roseman. Navigating hierarchically clustered networks through fisheye and full-zoom methods. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(2): 162-188, 1996, ACM Press.
25. 25.R. Spence, and M. D. Apperley. Data Base navigation: An office environment for the professional, Behaviour and Information Technology, 1(1):43-54, 1996
26. 26.M-A.D. Storey, K. Wong, and H. A. Miiller. How Do Program Understanding Tools Affect How Programmers Understand Programs? In Science of Computer Programming, 36(2-3), pp. 183-207, March 2000.
27. 27.O. Kuederle, K. M. Inkpen, S. Atkins, and M.S.T. Carpendale. Interacting with Image Sequences: Detailin-Context and Thumbnails. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface. June 2001.
28. 28.C. Ware and M. Lewis. The DragMag image magnifier. In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, CH1'95, pp. 407 - 408, 1995, ACM Press.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI design and evaluation methods

    • Interaction devices

      • Touch screens

  • Interaction design