A social action model of situated information systems design

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the nature of information systems (IS) design as situated in its organizational context. Much of the IS literature takes a fragmented perspective of the nature of IS design, examining methodological issues, social issues, or political issues in isolation from the context of the design initiative. Recent work in situated action and social cognition provides a basis for a more integrated understanding of situated IS design.Findings from a participant observation study of situated IS design are discussed, to form the basis for an integrative, social action model of IS design. Findings from the study demonstrate how innovative IS design activity is situated in its organizational context. It is argued that the form and nature of an organizational design "problem" is inseparable from its context and that design knowledge is distributed among a design team rather than shared intersubjectively. The situated nature of design requires design skills to be learned through simulated design contexts, rather than the communication of abstract models (as in many formal education programs). The situated model rejects the predefined goal-structures assumed by decompositional models of design, such as the "waterfall" model. It is suggested that design goal-definition must proceed recursively through the processes of design, which requires new approaches to the design and development of organizational information systems.

References

1. Ackoff, R.L. (1974). Redesigning the Future, Wiley.
2. Argyris, C. (1987). "Inner Contradictions in Management Information Systems," in R. Galliers, (Ed.), Information Analysis, Selected Readings, Addison-Wesley.
3. Argyris, C., and Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley.
4. Avison, D.E., and Wood-Harper, A.T., (1991). "Information Systems Development Research: An Exploration of Ideas in Practice," The Computer Journal, Vol. 34, No 2.
5. Bansler, J.P., and Bødker, K. (1993). "A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context," ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 165- 193.
6. Beath, C.M., and Orlikowski, W. (1994). "The Contradictory Nature of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-User Relationship in Information Engineering," Information Systems Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 350-377.
7. Boehm, B.W. (1988). "A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement," IEEE Computer Journal.
8. Boland, R.J., Tenkasi, R.V., and Te'eni, D. (1994). "Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp 456-475.
9. Brown, J.S., and Duguid, P. (1992). "Enacting Design for the Workplace," in P.S. Adler and T.A. Winograd (Eds.) Usability: Turning Technologies Into Tools, New York, NY: ACM Press.
10. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology In Action, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Curtis, B., Krasner, H., and Iscoe, N. (1988). "A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems," Communications of the ACM, Nov, 1988, Vol. 31, No. 11, pp 1268-1287.
13. Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Eden, C., Jones, S., and Sims, D. (1983). Messing about in Problems, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
15. Fitzgerald, B. (1996). "Formalized Systems Development Methodologies: A Critical Perspective," Information Systems Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 3-23.
16. Fitzgerald, B. (1997). "The Use of Systems Development Methodologies in Practice: A Field Study," Information Systems Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 201-212.
17. Flor, N.V., and Hutchins, E.L. (1991). "Analyzing Distributed Cognition in Software Teams: A Case Study of Team Programming During Perfective Software Maintenance," in J. Koenemann-Belliveau, T. Moher, and S. Robertson (Eds.) Empirical Studies of Programmers--Fourth Workshop, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Gadamer, H. (1975). "Hermeneutics and Social Science," Cultural Hermeneutics, Vol. 2, No. 4.
19. Galliers, R.D., and Swan, J. (1997). "Against Structured Approaches: Information Requirements Analysis as a Socially Mediated Process," in J.F. Nunamaker, Jr., and R.H. Sprague, Jr., (Eds.) Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Information Systems Track, IEEE Press, pp. 179-187.
20. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure, UK: Polity Press.
21. Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory, New York, NY: Aldine Publishing Company.
22. Guindon, R. (1990). "Knowledge Exploited by Experts during Software System Design," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 33, October, 1990, pp. 279-304.
23. Hardy, C., Thompson, B., and Edwards, H. (1995). "Problems Associated with the Customization of Structured Methods," in N. Jayaratna, R. Miles, Y. Merali, and S. Probert (Eds.) Proceedings of BCS Methodologies SIG Conference, North East Wales Institute of Higher Education, September, 1995.
24. Harry, M. (1997). Information Systems in Business, UK: Pitman Publishing.
25. Hutchins, E. (1990). "The Technology of Team Navigation," in J. Galagher, R.E. Kraut, and C. Egido (Eds.) Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. pp. 191-220.
26. Jeffries, R., Turner, A.A., Poison, P.G. and Atwood, M.E. (1981). "The Processes Involved In Designing Software," in J.R. Anderson (Ed.) Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Land, F., and Hirschheim, R. (1983). "Participative Systems Design: Rationale, Tools, and Techniques," Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, Vol. 10.
28. Latour, B. (1986). "Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands," Knowledge and Society, Vol. 6, pp. 1-40.
29. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Lave, J. (1991). "Situating Learning in Communities of Practice," in L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, and S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 63-82.
32. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Law, J., and Callon, M. (1992). "The Life and Death of an Aircraft: A Network Analysis of Technical Change," in W.E. Bijker and J. Law (Eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Lyytinen, K. (1987). "A Taxonomic Perspective of Information Systems Development Theory," in R.J. Boland and R.A. Hirschheim (Eds.) Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, Wiley.
35. Mackenzie, D.A., and Wajcman, J. (1985). "Introduction" to Mackenzie, D.A., and Wajcman, J. (Eds.) The Social Shaping of Technology, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
36. Malhotra, A., Thomas, J., Carroll, J., and Miller, L. (1980). "Cognitive Processes in Design," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 12, pp. 119-140.
37. Markus, M.L., and Bjørn-Andersen, N. (1987). "Power over Users: Its Exercise by System Professionals," Communications of the ACM, June, 1987, Vol. 30, No. 6.
38. Mayer, R.E. (1989). "Human Nonadversary Problem-Solving," in K.J. Gilhooley (Ed.) Human and Machine Problem-Solving, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
39. Moran, T. P., and Carroll, J.M. (1996). "Overview of Design Rationale," in T.R Moran, and J.M. Carroll (Eds.) Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Mumford, E., and Pettigrew, A. (1975). Implementing Strategic Decisions, London: Longman.
41. Nandhakumar, J., and Avison, D. (1997). "Information Systems Development Methodology in Use: An Empirical Study," in N. Jayaratna, and B. Fitzgerald (Eds.) Lessons Learned from the Use of Methodologies, Proceedings of BCS Methodologies SIG Conference, University College Cork, September, 1996.
42. Norman, D.A. (1986). "Cognitive Engineering," in D.A. Norman and S.W. Draper (Eds.) User-Centred System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
43. Norman, D.A. (1991). "Cognitive Artifacts," in J.M. Carroll (Ed.) Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17-38.
44. Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S., Carter, M.R., and Storrosten, M. (1992). "Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration," Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, pp 347- 374.
45. Rittell, H.W.J., and Webber, M.M. (1973), Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Poficy Sciences, Vol. 4, pp. 155-169.
46. Rosenbrock, H.H. (1981). "Engineers and the Work that People Do," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 4-8, September. Reprinted in Paton et al. (1984) Organisations: Cases, Issues, and Concepts, London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.
47. Rumelhart, D.E., and Norman, D.A. (1981). "Analogical Process In Learning," in Anderson, J.R. (Ed.) Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
48. Russo, N.L., Hightower, R., and Pearson, J.M. (1996). "The Failure of Methodologies to Meet the Needs of Current Development Environments" in N. Jayaratna and B. Fitzgerald (Eds.) Lessons Learned from the Use of Methodologies , Proceedings of BCS Methodologies SIG Conference, University College Cork.
49. Scarbrough, H. (1996). The Management of Expertise, Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Business.
50. Scott Morton, M.S. (Ed.) (1991). The Corporation of The 1990s, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51. Smircich, L., and Morgan, G. (1982). "Leadership: The Management of Meaning," Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 257-273.
52. Star, S. L. (1989), "The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving," in L. Gasser and M. N. Huhns (Eds.) Distributed Artificial Intelligence, II. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., pp. 37-54.
53. Star, S. L. (1992). "The Trojan Door: Organizations, Work, and the 'Open Black Box'," Systems Practice, Vol. 5, No. 4.
54. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Action, MA: Cambridge University Press.
55. Turner, J.A. (1987). "Understanding the Elements of Systems Design," in R.J. Boland, and R.A. Hirschheim, (Eds.) Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, Wiley.
56. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
57. Winograd, T., and Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Corporation.
58. Wolfe, R.A. (1994). "Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Direction," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 405-431.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Management of computing and information systems

      • Project and people management

        • Systems analysis and design