skip to main content
10.1145/379437.379729acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Cost-driven design for archival repositories

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

Designing an archival repository is a complex task because there are many alternative configurations, each with different reliability levels and costs. In this paper we study the costs involved in an Archival Repository and we introduce a design framework for evaluating alternatives and choosing the best configuration in terms of reliability and cost. We also present a new version of our simulation tool, ArchSim/C that aids in the decision process. The design framework and the usage of ArchSim/C are illustrated with a case study of a hypothetical (yet realistic) archival repository shared between two universities.

References

  1. 1.C. Borgman, S. Chen, H. Garcia-Monlina, K. Thibodeau, , and G. Wiederhold. NSF Workshop on Data Archival and Information Preservation. National Science Foundation, March 1999.At http://cecssrv1.cecs.missouri.edu/NSFWorkshop/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Y. Chen, J. Edler, A. Goldberg, A. Gottlieb, S. Sobti, and P. Yianilos. A prototype implementation of archival intermemory. InProceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.B. Cooper, A. Crespo, and H. Garcia-Molina. Implementing a reliable digital object archive, 1999. Submitted for publication to ACM DL 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.A. Crespo and H. Garcia-Molina. Modeling archival repositories for digital libraries. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference onResearch and Advanced Technology for Digital Libaries (ECDL), 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.A. Crespo and H. Garcia-Molina. Taking cost-driven decisions about archival repositories. Technical report, Stanford University. At http://www-db.stanford.edu/ crespo/papers, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Gartner Consulting. TCO Analyst. A White Paperon GartnerGroup's Next Generation Total Cost of Ownership Methodology, 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.A. Goldberg and P. Yianilos. Towards an archival intermemory. InAdvances in Digital Libraries, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.J. Halpern and C. Lagoze. The Computing Research Repository: Promoting the rapid dissemination and archiving of computer science research. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, August 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.R. Howard. The science of decision-making. In Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, volume 1, 1964.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.R. Howard. Decision analysis: Practice and promise. In Management Science, volume 34, 1988.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.H. Levy. Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.C. S. von Holstein. Assessment and evaluation of subjective probability distributions. Technical report, Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, 1970.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cost-driven design for archival repositories

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        JCDL '01: Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
        January 2001
        481 pages
        ISBN:1581133456
        DOI:10.1145/379437

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 January 2001

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        JCDL '01 Paper Acceptance Rate76of250submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader