skip to main content
article
Free Access

Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback

Published:01 December 2000Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

An experimental study of interaction in a collaborative desktop virtual environment is described. The aim of the experiment was to investigate if added haptic force feedback in such an environment affects perceived virtual presence, perceived social presence, perceived task performance, and task performance. A between-group design was employed, where seven pairs of subjects used an interface with graphic representation of the environment, audio connection, and haptic force feedback. Seven other pairs of subjects used an interface without haptic force feedback, but with identical features otherwise. The PHANToM, a one-point haptic device, was used for the haptic force feedback, and a program especially developed for the purpose provided the virtual environment. The program enables for two individuals placed in different locations to simultaneously feel and manipulate dynamic objects in a shared desktop virtual environment. Results show that haptic force feedback significantly improves task performance, perceived task performance, and pereceived virtual presence in the collaborative distributed environment. The results suggest that haptic force feedback increases perceived social presence, but the difference is not significant.

References

  1. APPELLE, S. 1991. Haptic perception of form: Activity and stimulus attributes. In The Psychology of Touch, M. Heller and W. Schiff, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 169-188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BASDOGAN, C., HO, C., SLATER, M., AND SRINIVASAN, M. A. 1998. The role of haptic communication in shared virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Phantom User Group (Dedham, MA, Oct. 3-6). http://www.ai.mit.edu/conferences/pug98Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BURDEA, G. C. 1996. Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. DAFT,R.L.AND LENGEL, R. H. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Manage. Sci. 32, 5 (May), 554-571. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DURLACH,N.AND SLATER, M. 1998. Presence in shared virtual environments and virtual togetherness. In Proceedings of the British Telecom Workshop on Presence in Shared Virtual Environments (Ipswich, Suffolk, June 10-11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. GUPTA, R., SHERIDAN, T., AND WHITNEY, D. 1997. Experiments using multimodal virtual environments in design for assembly analysis. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6,3, 318-338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. HASSER,C.J.,GOLDENBERG,A.S.,MARTIN,K.M.,AND ROSENBERG, L. B. 1998. User performing a GUI pointing task with a low-cost force-feedback computer mouse. In Proceedings of the Conference on ASME Dynamics and Control Division. 151-156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. HELD,R.M.AND DURLACH, N. I. 1992. Telepresence. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1,1 (Winter), 109-112. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. HENDRIX,C.AND BARFIELD, W. 1996. The sense of presence within auditory virtual environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 5, 3, 290-301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. HOFFMAN,H.G.,HOLLANDER, A., SCHRODER, K., ROUSSEAU, S., AND FURNESS, T. 1998. Physically touching and tasting virtual objects enhances the realism of virtual experiences. Virt. Real. 3, 226-234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. HURMUZLU, Y., EPHANOV, A., AND STOIANOVICI, D. 1998. Effect of a pneumatically driven haptic interface on the perceptional capabilities of human operators. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 7, 3, 290-307. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ISHII, M., NAKATA, M., AND SATO, M. 1994. Networked SPIDAR: A networked virtual environment with visual, auditory, and haptic interactions. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 3, 4, 351-359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. KATZ,R.AND TUSHMAN, M. 1978. Communication patterns, project performance, and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation in an R&D setting. Org. Behav. Hum. Perf. 23, 139-162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. MASSIE, T. H. 1996. Initial haptic explorations with the phantom: Virtual touch through point interaction. Master's Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MCLEOD, P. L. 1996. New communication technologies for group decision making: Toward an integrated framework. In Communication and Group Decision Making, R. Y. Hirokawa and M. S. Poole, Eds. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 426-461.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. RICE, R. E. 1993. Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Hum. Comm. Res. 19, 4, 451-484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. SHORT, J., WILLIAMS, E., AND CHRISTIE, B. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. SJOSTROM,C.AND RASSMUS-GROHN, K. 1999. The sense of touch provides new computer interaction techniques for disabled people. Tech. Disab. Res. & Dev. 10, 1, 45-52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. SLATER,M.AND WILBUR, S. 1997. A framework for immersive virtual environments (Five): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6, 6, 603-616.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. WITMER,B.G.AND SINGER, M. J. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 7, 3, 225-240. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback

                  Recommendations

                  Reviews

                  M. M.C. Schraefel

                  The article presents the results of an experiment to consider whether or not a haptic force feedback interaction improves virtual presence, perceived social presence, perceived task performance, and task performance in shared tasks carried out in a desktop virtual environment. The article clearly describes the experimental measures, and as such proves a useful model for describing and reporting experimental results in general. The authors claim that the results demonstrate, "that haptic force feedback gives added support to people performing collaborative tasks in a multimodal interface." Three of the five tasks in the experiment, however, can be carried out without the virtual assistance of one of the participant pairs. The experiment does not seem to control for the degree to which any pair worked together or separately for these tasks. While it is clear from the results that haptic force feedback did improve most measures for this experiment (and this is an important result), it is not clear the degree to which this improvement is in shared or not shared task experience, so the authors' claim may or may not be justified. It would be worthwhile to consider repeating the experiment, using a design which required collaboration for each task.

                  Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

                  Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in

                  Full Access

                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
                    ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 7, Issue 4
                    Special issue on human-computer interaction and collaborative virtual environments
                    Dec. 2000
                    108 pages
                    ISSN:1073-0516
                    EISSN:1557-7325
                    DOI:10.1145/365058
                    Issue’s Table of Contents

                    Copyright © 2000 ACM

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 1 December 2000
                    Published in tochi Volume 7, Issue 4

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • article

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader