skip to main content
article
Free Access

The collision of trademarks, domain names, and due process in cyberspace

Published:01 February 2001Publication History
First page image
Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. 1 Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 106-43 3(a)(2), 5, 113 Stat. 218, 220 (1999).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 British Telecommunications plc and another v One In a Million Ltd and others and other actions {1998} 4 All ER 476, {1999} 1 WLR 903, {1999} RPC 1; see www.bna.com/e-law/cases/ukspencer.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Froomkin, A. Semi-private international rulemaking: Lessons learned from the WIPO domain name process. In Regulating the Global Information Society, C. Marsden, Ed. Routledge, London and New York, 2000; see www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/tprc99.pdf.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Froomkin, A. Wrong turn in cyberspace: Using ICANN to route around the APA and the Constitution. Duke Law J. 50, 1 (2000), 17-186.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5 ICANN. Uniform Domain-Name Dispute Resolution Policy; see www.icann.org/udrp/ udrp-policy-24oct99.htm (Oct. 24, 1999)]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 ICANN. Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy; see www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-rules-24oct99.htm (Oct. 24, 1999).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Intermatic, Inc., v Toeppen, 947 F. Supp. 1227, 1237-40 (N.D. Ill. 1996)]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Mueller, M. Rough justice: An analysis of ICANN's uniform dispute resolution policy. Info. Soc. (2001); see dcc.syr.edu/roughjustice.htm]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Postel, J. RFC 1591, Domain Name System Structure and Delegation, Internet Engineering Task Force; see www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1591.txt (Mar. 1994).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 Postel, J. and Reynolds, J. RFC 920, Domain Requirements 1, Internet Engineering Task Force; see www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0920.txt (Oct. 1984)]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11 U.S. Dept. of Commerce. Management of Internet names and addresses. Fed. Reg. 65 (June 10, 1998), 31,741-31,751; see www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/ domainname/6_5_98dns.htm.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 World Intellectual Property Association. The Management of Internet Names and Addresses: Intellectual Property Issues, Final Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process, 1999; see wipo2.wipo.int/process1/ report/finalreport.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The collision of trademarks, domain names, and due process in cyberspace

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    James Cecil Hammerton

    Trademarks" get an "F" for familiarity, mostly because trademarks have been around for sufficiently long that we are accustomed to their meaning. But the nature of a "domain name", for example, is a different idea. `The practice of registering names corresponding to trademarks and then trying to resell them to trademark holders (for a profit) is a natural extension of the trademark idea. The possible trademark extension which is envisioned is the expansion of business for "Joe's Pizza". This is a "trademark" situation in which "Joe's Pizza" may easily provide an outlet in other parts of the country, less immediately known to other parts of the "Joe's Pizza" market The larger view occurs when you consider the use of a product's name. as part of an advertising message which could be incorporated. The initial jump to the larger market area is easy enough. The market implications which are involved in shifting from the well-consolidated "trademark" area can be embraced without much hazard. The extensions of the marketing implications are easy enough to envision. The added extensions which are foisted on the organization in its mode of operation are more difficult. To draw new boundaries which define the different capabilities are more difficult to be clear about. The restrictive nature of the new boundaries are difficult to define at best. The expansion of the legal coverage is considerable and has to be argued with care. There is a well developed extension of the new trademark names which results in a welter of complex capital letters. For example, ICANN - Internet Computer Assignment Name and Number. Or SLD - Second Level Domain; or TLD- Top Level Domain. Or try UDRP, which means Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy. The proliferation of such acronyms is a hazard, but can be mastered. On the other hand the same extension of thinking as appears in Bill Gates' definition of the meaning of the wider implications as in Intelligent Internet.

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Communications of the ACM
      Communications of the ACM  Volume 44, Issue 2
      Feb. 2001
      92 pages
      ISSN:0001-0782
      EISSN:1557-7317
      DOI:10.1145/359205
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2001 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 February 2001

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format