skip to main content
article
Free Access

On approaches to the study of social issues in computing

Published:01 March 1981Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper identifies and analyzes technical and nontechnical biases in research on social issues in computing. Five positions—technicism, progressive individualism, elitism, pluralism, and radical criticism—which reflect major streams of contemporary social thought are examined. The analysis of positions documents the close relationship between research and policy formation and reveals the misleading and dangerous character of the presumption of scholarly objectivity in research on social issues.

References

  1. 1 Alford, R.R. The political economy of health care: Dynamics without change. Politics and Society 2, (1972) pp. 127-164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2 Allison, G.T. Essence of Decision. Little, Brown and Co. Boston, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Armer, P. Computer technology and surveillance. Tech. Rept. Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA. June 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Armer, P. Electronic funds transfer systems and the consumer. Tech. Rept. Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford CA. Jan. 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Barna, B. The Datamation 50. Datamation 25 (May 25, 1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Barron, I. and Curnow, R. The Future with Microelectronics. The Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Bitzer, D. The wide world of computer-based education. In: M. Rubinoff and M.C. Yovits. Eds., Advances in Computers Volume 15, Academic, New York, 1976, pp. 239-283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Brewer, G.D. Politicians, Bureaucrats, and the Consultant: A Critique of Urban Problem Solving. Basic Books, New York, 1973. {8(a)} Briefs, U. The effects of computerization on human work--new directions for computer use in the work-place. In Human Choice and Computers, 2. A. Mowshowitz, Ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Brock, G.W. The U.S. Computer Industry. Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Brown, J.S. and Goldstein, I. Computers in a Learning Society. Testimony for the House Science and Technology Subcommittee on Domestic and International Planning, Analysis and Cooperation, Washington, D.C., Oct. 13, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 Colstad, K. and Lipkin, E. Community memory: a public information system. Preprint of paper presented at the Computer Science section of the 1EEE meeting of San Francisco, CA. Feb. 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 Cundiff, W.E. Issues in Canadian/U.S. Transborder Computer Data Flows. Tech. Rept. Inst. for Research on Public Policy, Montreal, Canada, Sept. 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Downs, A. A realistic look at the final payoffs from urban data systems. Publ. Admin. Rev. 27, (Sept, 1967) pp. 204-209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14 Ellul, J. The Technological Society. Vintage Books, New York, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 Fano, R.M. On the social role of computer communications. Proc. IEEE60, 11 (Nov. 1972), pp. 1249-1253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. 16 Forrester, J.W. World Dynamics. Wright-Allen, Cambridge, Mass., 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 Friedrichs, G. Microelecrouics-A new dimension of technological change and automation. Club of Rome Conf., "The Coming Decade of Danger and Opportunity," West Berlin, Germany, Oct. 3-6, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 Gotlieb, C.C. Computers in the home: What they can do for us and to us. Occasional Paper No. 4, Inst. for Research on Public Policy, Montreal, Canada, Oct. 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 Gotlieb, C.C. and Borodin, A. Social Issues in Computing. Academic, New York, 1973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20 Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. The Network Nation: Human Communication via Computer. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21 Hoffman, LJ. Modern Methods for Computer Security and Privacy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 Hoos, I.R. Systems analysis, information handling, and the research function: Implications of the california experience. Working Paper, Space Sciences Project, University of California, Berkeley, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 Hoos, I.R. Systems Analysis in Public Policy: A Critique. University of California, Berkeley, CA., 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 Jonasson, S. Computerization and human and social requirements. In Human Choice and Computers, 2. A. Mowshowitz, Ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 Keen, P. Information systems and organizational change. Comm. ACM 24, 1 (Jan. 1981)24-33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26 Kling, R. Computers and social power. Comptrs. and Society 5, 1974 pp. 6-11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27 Kling, R. Value conflicts and social choice in electronic funds transfer system developments. Comm. ACM 21, 8 (Aug, 1978) pp. 642-657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28 Kling, R. Information systems in policy making. Telecomm. Policy 2, 1 (March 1978) pp. 3-12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. 29 Kling, R. Social issues and impacts of computing: From arena to discipline. In Human Choice and Computers, 2. A. Mowshowitz, Ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 Kling, R. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Comptng. Surveys 12, 1 (March, 1980) pp. 61-110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31 Kraemer, K.L. Computers, information and power in local governments. In Human Choice and Computers, 2. A. Mowshowitz, Ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32 Laudon, K.C. Computers and Bureaucratic Reform. Wiley, New York, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33 Laudon, K.C. Communications Technology and Democratic Participation. Praeger, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34 Licklider, J.C.R. Libraries of the Future. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. 35 Lipset, S.M. Political Man. Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y., 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. 36 Martin, J.L. The Wired Society. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. 37 McDermott, J. Technology: The opiate of the intellectuals. N. Y. Rev. of Books 13 (July 31, 1969).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. 38 Mowshowitz, A. The Conquest of Will." Information Processing in Human Affairs. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. 39 Mowshowitz, A. Computers and the mechanization of judgment, J. Community Communications 111 (Fall 1978), pp. 21-32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. 40 Mowshowitz, A. A Critique of "Preserving Individual Autonomy in an Information Oriented Society". In L.J. Hoffman, Ed, Computers and Privacy in the Next Decade. Academic, New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. 41 Mumford, E. and Banks, O. The Computer and the Clerk. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. 42 Mumford, Lewis. The Myth of the Machine: L Technics and Human Development. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. 43 Nelson, T. Computer Lib. Hugo's Book Service, Chicago, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. 44 Nora, S. and Minc, A. Informatisation de la Societd La Documentation frangaise, Paris, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. 45 Nyborg, P.S., McCarter, P.M., and Erickson, W. Eds. Information processing in the United States: A quantitative summary. AFIPS, Montvale, N.J., 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. 46 Nygaard, K. Workers participation in system development. In Human Choice and Computers, 2. A. Mowshowitz, Ed., North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. 47 OECD, Gaps in Technology: Electronic Computers, A Report of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. 48 Parker, D.B. Computer abuse perpetrators and vulnerabilities of computer systems. Tech. Rept. SRI, Stanford, CA. Dec. 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. 49 Press, L. Arguments for a moratorium on the construction of a community information utility. Comm. ACM 17, 12 (Dec. 1974) pp. 674--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. 50 Rule, J.B. Insight and Social Betterment. Oxford University Press, New York, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. 51 Rule, J.B. Preserving individual privacy in an informationoriented society. In L.J. Hoffman, Ed., Computers and Privacy in the Next Decade. Academic, New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. 52 Sackman, H. A public philosophy for real time information systems. In Proc. 1968 Fall Joint Comptr. Conf. AF1PS, Montvale, N.J., 1968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. 53 Sieghart, P. Privacy and Computers. Latimer, London, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. 54 Simon, H.A. The Shape of Automation for Men and Management. Harper and Row, New York, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. 55 Sterling, T.D. Guidelines for humanizing computerized information systems: Rept. from Stanley House, Comm. A CM 17, 11 (Nov., 1974) pp. 609-613. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. 56 Sterling, T.D. Consumer difficulties with computerized transactions: An empirical investigation. Comm. A CM 22, 5 (May, 1979) pp, 283-289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. 57 Stewart, R. How Computers Affect Management. Macmillan, London, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. 58 Trades Union Congress Employment and Technology, TUC Interim Rept., London, May 30, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. 59 Ware, W.H. Records, Computers and the Rights of Citizens. Washington, D.C.U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. 60 Weizenbaum, J. Computer Power and Human Reason:from Judgment to Calculation. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. 61 Weizenbaum, J. Human choice in the interstices of the megamachine. In A. Mowshowitz, Ed., Human Choice and Computers, 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. 62 Westin, A.F. Legal safeguards to insure privacy in a computer society. Comm. ACM 10, 9 (Sept. 1967), pp. 533-537. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. 63 Whisler, T.L. The lmpact of Computers on Organizations. Praeger, New York, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. 64 Winner, L. Autonomous Technology. M1T, Cambridge, Mass, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On approaches to the study of social issues in computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader