PIROL: a case study for multidimensional separation of concerns in software engineering environments

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present our experience with applying multidimensional separation of concerns to a software engineering environment. By comparing two different designs of our system, we show the importance of separating integration issues from the implementation of the individual concerns. We present a model in which integration issues are encapsulated into rst--class connector objects and indicate how this facilitates the understandability, maintenance and evolution of the system. We identify issues of binding time, binding granularity and binding cardinality as important criteria in selecting an appropriate model for separation of concerns. We finally show how a good choice following these criteria and considering the requirements of software engineering environments leads to a system with dynamic configurability, high--level component integration and support for multiple instantiable views.

References

1. 1.M. Aksit, K. Wakita, J. Bosch, L. Bergmans, and A. Yonezawa. Abstracting Object Interactions using Composition-Filters. In Object-Based Distributed Processing, LNCS 791, pp. 152-184, 1993. 17
2. 2.K. Arnold and J. Gosling. The Java Programming Language. Addison Wesley, 1997. 6
3. 3.Kim B. Bruce, Martin Odersky, and Philip Wadler. A statically safe alternative to virtual types. In European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP), Brussels, July 1998. 15
4. 4.Clemens Czyperski. Component Software, Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley, 1998. 4
5. 5.D. D.aberitz and U. Kelter. Rapid Prototyping of Graphical Editors in an open SEE. In Proc. of 7th Conference on Software Engineering Environments (SEE'95), pp. 61-72. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995.
6. 6.R. DeLine. Avoiding Packaging Mismatch with Flexible Packaging. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '99), 1999. 17
7. 7.E. W. Dijkstra. A Discipline of Programming. Prentice- Hall, 1976. 1
8. 8.E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns - Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison Wesley, 1995. 6
9. 9.D. Garlan. Views for Tools in Integrated Environments. PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, May 1987. 5, 14, 16
10. 10.D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom. Architectural Mismatch, or, Why it's Hard to Build Systems out of Existing Parts. In Proceedings of the 17th Internation Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '95), pp. 179-185, April 1995. 17
11. 11.A. Goldberg and D. Robson. Smalltalk 80: The Language and its Implementation. Addison-Wesley, 1983. 15
12. 12.The GoodStep Team. The GOODSTEP Project: General Object-Oriented Database for Software Engineering Processes. In Proc. of the 1st Asian Pacific Software Engineering Conf, pp. 10-19. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994. 16
13. 13.G. Gottlob, M. Schre , and B. Roeck. Extending Object-Oriented Systems with Roles. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(3):268-296, 1996. 17
14. 14.B. Groth, S. Herrmann, S. J.ahnichen, and W. Koch. Project Integrating Reference Object Library (PIROL): An Object-Oriented Multiple-View SEE. In Proc. of 7th Conference on Software Engineering Environments (SEE'95), pp. 184-193, IEEE Computer Society Press, Apr. 1995. 3
15. 15.W. Harrison and H. Ossher. Subject-Oriented Programming: a Critique of Pure Objects. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA '93), Sigplan Notices 28(10), pp. 411-428, 1993. 1, 2
16. 16.S. Herrmann. Lua/P - A Repository Language for Flexible Software Engineering Environments. In Proc. of The Second International Symposium on Constructing Software Engineering Tools, pp. 78-86, ISBN 0 86418 725 4, 2000. 3, 5
17. 17.S. Herrmann and M. Mezini.Dynamic View Connectors, http://pirol.cs.tu-berlin.de/papers/DVC.pdf, Technical Report, Technical University of Berlin, 2000. 12
18. 18.I. Holland. The Design and Representation of Object- Oriented Components. PhD Thesis, Northeastern University, Computer Science, 1993. 1, 17
19. 19.R. Ierusalimschy, L. H. de Figueiredo, and W. Celes, \Lua|an extensible extension language," Software: Practice and Experience, 26(6):635-652, 1996. 15
20. 20.M. Kersten and G. Murphy. Atlas: A Case Study in Building a Web-Based Learning Environment Using Aspect-Oriented Programming. In Proeedings of ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA'99), Sigplan Notices 34(10):340-352, 1999. 17
21. 21.G. Kiczales, J. des Rivieres, and D. G. Bobrow. The Art of the Metaobject Protocol. The MIT Press, 1991. 1
22. 22.G. Kiczales, J. Lamping, A. Mendhekar, C. Maeda, C.V. Lopes, J.M. Loingtier, and J. Irwin. Aspect Oriented Programming. In Proceedings of European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '97), LNCS 1241, pp. 220-243, 1997. 1, 15, 17
23. 23.K. Lieberherr. Adaptive Programming: the Demeter Method. PWS Publishing Company, 1996. 12, 17
24. 24.C. Lopes. D: A Language Framework for Distributed Programming. PhD Thesis, Northeastern University, Computer Science, Nov. 1997. 2
25. 25.P. Maes. Concepts and Experiments in Computational Re ection. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA '87), Sigplan Notices, 22(12):147-155, 1987. 1
26. 26.J. McAffer. Meta-Level Programming with Coda. In Proceedings of European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '95), LNCS 952, pp. 190-241, Springer Verlag, 1995. 1
27. 27.M. Mezini. Variational Object-Oriented Programming Beyond Classes and Inheritance. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1998. 1, 17
28. 28.M. Mezini and K. Lieberherr. Adaptive Plug-and-Play Components for evolutionary software development. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA '98), Sigplan Notices, 33(10):97-116, 1998. 1, 8, 15, 17
29. 29.M. Mezini, L. Seiter, and K. Lieberherr. Component Integration with Pluggable Composite Adapters. In M. Aksit (ed.) Software Architecture and Component Technology: State of the Art in Research and Industry, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. 2, 8, 15
30. 30.R. Monson-Haefel. Enterprise Java Beans. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc, 1999. 18
31. 31.A. Nordwig. Entwicklung einer Notation und eines graschen Editors f. ur den objektorientierten Entwurf hybrider Systeme. Master's Thesis, TU Berlin, 1997. 4, 5
32. 32.B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer, and A. Finkelstein. A Framework for Expressing the Relationships Between Multiple Views in Requirements Specification. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(10):760-773, Oct. 1994. 17
33. 33.Object Design, Inc, Burlington, MA. ObjectStore Advanced C++ API User Guide, March 1998. 16
34. 34.H. Ossher, M. Kaplan, A. Katz, W. Harrison, and V. Kruskal. Specifying Subject-Oriented Composition. Theory and Practice of Object Systems, 2(3):179-202, 1996. 5, 14
35. 35.PARC Xerox, available from http://aspectj.org. AspectJ Language Specification, Aug 1999. 2
36. 36.D. L. Parnas. On the Criteria to be Used in Decomposing Systems in Modules. Communications of the ACM, 15(12), 1972. 1
37. 37.ISO/IEC 13719-1: Portable Common Tool Environment (PCTE). Abstract Specification, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 1995. 16
38. 38.PIROL Web-page. http://pirol.cs.tu-berlin.de. 3
39. 39.T. Reenskaug, E. P. Andersen, A. J. Berre, A. Hurlen, A. Landmark, O. A. Lehne, E. Nordhagen, E. Ness- Ulseth, G. Oftedal, A. L. Skaar, and P. Stenslet. OORASS: Seamless Support for the Creation and Maintenance of Object Oriented Systems. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, Oct. 1992. 1
40. 40.S. P. Reiss. Connecting Tools Using Message Passing in the FIELD Environment. IEEE Software, 7(4):57- 66, July 1990. 3
41. 41.S. P. Reiss. The Desert Environment. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 8(4):297-342, Oct. 1999. 17
42. 42.J. Richardson and P. Schwarz. Aspects: Extending Objects to Support Multiple, Independent Roles. In Proceedings of the 1991 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 1991. 2, 7
43. 43.C. Santos, S. Delobel, and S. Abiteboul. Virtual Schemas and Bases. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology, LNCS 779, 1994. 16
44. 44.L. Seiter, J. Palsberg, and K. Lieberherr. Evolution of Object Behavior using Context Relations. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(1):79-92, Jan. 1998. 17
45. 45.M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture: Perspectives of an Emerging Discipline. Prentice Hall, 1996. 2, 3
46. 46.Y. Smaragdakis and D. Batory. Implementing Layered Designs with Mixin Layers. In Proceedings of European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP '98), LNCS 1445, pp. 550-570, Springer Verlag, 1998. 1, 17
47. 47.M. Steffik, D. Bobrow, and K. Kahn. Integrating Access- Oriented Programming into a Multiparadigm Environment. IEEE Software, 3(1):10-18, Jan. 1986. 5
48. 48.K. Sullivan and D. Notkin. Reconciling Environment Integration and Software Evolution. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 1(3):229- 268, 1992. 1, 3, 7, 16
49. 49.P. Tarr, H. Ossher, W. Harrison, and S. Sutton Jr. N degrees of Separation: Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '99), 1999. 1, 15, 17
50. 50.D. Ungar and R. Smith. Self: The power of simplicity. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA '87), Sigplan Notices, 22(12):227-242, 1987. 15
51. 51.M. VanHilst and D. Notkin. Using Role Components to Implement Collaboration-Based Designs. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA '96), Sigplan Notices, 31(10):359-369, 1996. 1, 17
52. 52.R.J. Wieringa and W. de Jonge. Object Identifiers, Keys, and Surrogates. Theory and Practice of Object Systems, 1(2):101-114, 1995. 7

Index Terms

• Software and its engineering

  • Software notations and tools

    • Development frameworks and environments

    • General programming languages

      • Language types

  • Software organization and properties

    • Software system structures

      • Software architectures