skip to main content
10.5555/353053.353073acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Framing design: a social process view of information system development

Published:13 December 1998Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Bansler, J. P., and B~dker, K. "A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context," ACM Transactions on Information Systems (11:2), 1993, pp. 165-193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ball, L. J., and Ormerod, T. C. "Structured and Opportunistic Processing in Design: A Critical Discussion," International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (43), 1995, pp. 131-151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Boehm, B. W. "A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement," IEEE Computer Journal, May 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boland, R J.; Tenkasi, R V.; and Te'eni, D. "Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition," Organiza-tion Science (5:3), 1994, pp. 456-475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brown, J. S.; Collins, A.; and Duguid, S. "Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning," Educational Researcher (18:1), 1989, pp. 32-42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. "Enacting Design for the Workplace," in P. S. Adler and T. A. Winograd (eds.), Usability: Turning Technologies Into Tools, ACM Press, New York, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Callon, M. "Techno-Economic Networks and Irreversibility," in J. Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, London, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Clegg, C. Psychology and Information Technology: The Study of Cognition in Organisations," British Journal of Psychology (85), 1994, pp. 449-477.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Curtis, B.; Krasner, H.; and Iscoe, N. "A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems," Communications of the ACM (31:11), November 1988, pp. 1268-1287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Eason, K. D. "The Process of Introducing Information Technology," Behavior and Information Technology (1:2), April-June 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eden, C.; Jones, S.; and Sims, D. Messing about in Problems, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Egidi, M. "Organizational Learning, Problem Solving and the Division of Labour," in M. Egidi and R. Marris (eds.), Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Aldershot, UK, 1992Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman, A. L., and Cornford, D. S. Computer Systems Development: History, Organization and Implementation, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gadamer, H. "Hermeneutics and Social Science," Cultural Hermeneutics (2:4), 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Galliers, R. D. "An Approach to Information Needs Analysis," in R. D. Galliers (ed.), Information Analysis, Selected Readings, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Galliers, R. D., and Swan, J. "Against Structured Approaches: Information Requirements Analysis as a Socially Mediated Process," in J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., and R. H. Sprague, Jr. (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Information Systems Track, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1997, pp. 179-187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gasser, L. "The Integration of Computing and Routine Work," ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems (4), 1986, pp. 205-252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gasson, S., and Holland, N. "The Nature and Processes of IT-Related Change," in W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, Chapman & Hall, London, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Aldine Publishing Company, New York, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Guindon, R. "Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts," Human-Computer Interaction (5), 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirschheim, R. A. "Participative Systems Design User Experiences, Evaluation and Conclusions," The Australian Computer Journal (18:4), 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hutchins, E. "The Technology of Team Navigation," in J. Galagher, R. E. Kraut, and C. Egido (eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990, pp. 191-220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Land, F. "Adapting to Changing User Requirements," in R. Galliers (ed.), Information Analysis, Selected Readings, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lanzara, G. F. "The Design Process: Frames, Metaphors And Games," in U. Briefs, C. Ciborra, and L. Schneider (eds.), Systems Design For, With and By the Users, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Latour, B. Science in Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lave, J. "Situating Learning in Communities of Practice," in L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 1991, pp. 63-82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Lewis, P. J. Information-Systems Development, Pitman Publishing, London, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lientz, B. P., and Swanson, E. B. Software Maintenance Management: A Study of the Maintenance of Computer Application Software in 487 Data Processing Organizations, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1980 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mackenzie, D. A., and Wajcman, J. (Editors). The Social Shaping Of Technology, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Malhotra, A.; Thomas, J.; Carroll, J.; and Miller, L. "Cognitive Processes in Design," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (12) 1980, pp. 119-140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Mayer, R. E. "Human Nonadversary Problem-Solving" in K. J. Gilhooley (ed.), Human and Machine Problem-Solving, Plenum Press, New York, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mingers, J., and Brocklesby, J "Multimethodology: Towards a Framework for Critical Pluralism," Systemist (18:3), 1996 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Moran, T. P., and Carroll, J. M. "Overview of Design Rationale," in T. P. Moran and J. M. Carroll (eds.), Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. Human Problem-Solving, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Norman, D. A. "Cognitive Artifacts," in J. M. Carroll (ed.) ,Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991, pp. 17-38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Olson, J. S.; Olson, G. M.; Storrosten, M.; and Carter, M. R. "Groupwork Close Up: A Comparison of the Group Design Process With and Without a Simple Group Editor," ACM Transactions on Information Systems (11:4), 1993, pp. 321-348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Rittell, H. W. J., and Webber, M. M. "Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning," Policy Sciences (4), 1973, pp. 155-169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Sch~n, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Simon, H. A. "The Structure of Ill-Structured Problems," Artificial Intelligence (4), 1973, pp. 145-180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Smircich, L., and Morgan, G. "Leadership: The Management of Meaning," Journal of Applied Behavioural Science (18:3), 1982, pp. 257-273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Star, S. L. "The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving," in L. Gasser and M. N. Huhns (eds.), Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. II, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Mateo, CA, 1989, pp. 37-54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Suchman, L. Plans And Situated Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner, J. A. "Understanding the Elements of Systems Design," in R. J. Boland, and R. A. Hirschheim (eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, Wiley, New York, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Walz, D.; Elam, J.; and Curtis, B. "Inside a Design Team: Knowledge Acquisition, Sharing and Integration," Communications of the ACM (36:10), October 1993, pp. 63-77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Wilkinson, B. The Shopfloor Politics of New Technology, Gower Press, London, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolfe, R. A. "Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Direction," Journal of Management Studies (31:3), 1994, pp. 405-431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Framing design: a social process view of information system development

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader