skip to main content
10.1145/336595.337503acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Dynamically altering agent behaviors using natural language instructions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 June 2000Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Badler, N., D. Chi, and S. Chopra. 1999. Virtual human animation based on movement observation and cognitive behavior models. In Proceedings of the Computer Animation 1998, 128-137. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Badler, N., M. Palmer, and R. Bindiganavale. 1999. Animation control for real-time virtual humans. Communications of the ACM 42(7): 65-73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Badler, N., B. Webber, J. Kalita, and J. Esakov. 1990. Animation from instructions. In N. Badler, B. Barsky, and D. Zeltzer, eds., Making Them Move: Mechanics, Control, and Animation of Articulated Figures, 51-93. San Francisco, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Badler, N., B. Webber, M. Palmer, T. Noma, M. Stone, J. Rosenzweig, S. Chopra, K. Stanley, J. Bourne, and B. Di Eugenio. 1997. Final report to Air Force HRGA regarding feasibility of natural language text generation from task networks for use in automatic generation of Technical Orders from DEPTH simulations. Technical Report, CIS, University of Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Bourne, J., 1998. Generating adequate instructions: Knowing when to stop. In Proceedings of the AAAI/IAAI Conference, 1169. Doctoral Consortium Section, Madison, Wisconsin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Brooks, R., A robot that walks: Emergent behaviors from a carefully evolved network. Neural Computation 1(2): 253- 262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Cassell, J., and H. Vilhjailmsson. 1999. Fully Embodied Conversational Avatars: Making Communicative Behaviors Autonomous. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2(1): 45-64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Cavazza, M., R. Earnshaw, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, and D. Thalmann. 1998. Motion control of virtual humans. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 18(5): 24-31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Chapman, D. 1990. Vision, instruction, and action. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.DiEugenio, B. and B. Webber. 1992. Plan recognition in understanding instructions. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, 52-61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Douville, B., L. Levison, and N. Badler. 1996. Task level object grasping for simulated agents. Presence 5(4): 416- 430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Eamshaw, R., N. Magnenat-Thalmann, D. Terzopoulos, and D. Thalmann. 1998. Computer animation for virtual humans. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 18(5): 20-23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Firby, R. 1994. Task networks for controlling continuous processes. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI Planning Systems, 49-54, Chicago IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Granieri, J., Becket, W., and Reich, B.D. 1995. Behavioral control for real-time simulated human agents. Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 173-180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Huffman, S.B., and J.E. Laird. 1995. Flexibly instructable agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 3: 271-324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Johnson, W.L. and J. Rickel. 1997. Steve: An animated pedagogical agent for procedural training in virtual environments. SIGARTBulletin, 8(1-4): 16-21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Joshi, A.K., 1985. How much context sensitivity is necessary for characterizing structural descriptions: Tree adjoining grammars. In D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky, eds., Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives, 206-250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.Joshi, A.K., and Y. Schabes. 1996. Tree-Adjoining Grammars and Lexicalized Grammars. Handbook of Formal Languages and Automata. Springer Verlag, Berlin, eds: A. Salomaa & G. Rosenberg, 409-431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Kallmeyer, L. and A. Joshi. 1999. Underspecified Semantics with LTAG. In Proceedings of Amsterdam Colloquium on Semantics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Kallmann, M., and D. Thalmann. 1999. A behavioral interface to simulate agent-object interactions in real-time. In Proceedings of Computer Animation, 138-146. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Kalra, P., A. Mangili, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, and D. Thalmann. 1992. Simulation of muscle actions using rational free form deformations. Proceedings Eurographics "92, Computer Graphics Forum 2(3): 59-69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22.Lutz, M. 1996. Programming Python. Sebastapol: O'Reilly. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.Narayanan, S. 1997. Talking the talk is like walking the walk. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 548-553. Palo Alto, Calif. Mahwah, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Palmer, M., J. Rosenzweig, and W. Schuler. 1998. Capturing motion verb generalizations with synchronous tag. In P. St. Dizier, ed., Predicative Forms in NLP. Text, Speech, and Language Technology Series, 250-277. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Muwer Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Pedin,.K., and A. Goldberg. 1996. Improv: A system for scripting interactive actors in virtual worlds. In Computer Graphics, 205-216. New York, NY: ACM SIGGRAPH. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.Rickel J., and W.L. Johnson 1999. Animated agents for procedural training in virtual reality: Perception, cognition and motor control. Applied Artificial Intelligence (13 ):343- 382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Schuler, W. 1999. Preserving semantic dependencies in synchronous tree adjoining grammar. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 88-95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.Shi, J., T. J. Smith, J. Granieri, and N. Badler. 1999. Smart avatars in JackMOO. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, 156-163. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.Shieber, S. 1994. Restricting the weak-generative capability of synchronous tree adjoining grammars. Computational Intelligence 10(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.Shieber, S. and Y. Schabes. 1990. Synchronous tree adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Helsinki, Finland. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31.Trias, T., S. Chopra, B. Reich, M. Moore, N. Badler, B. Webber, and C. Geib. 1996. Decision networks for integrating the behaviors of virtual agents and avatars. In Proceedings of IEEE. Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. 32.Vere, S. and T. Bickmore. 1990. A basic agent. Computational Intelligence, 6: 1-22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. 33.Webber, B., N. Badler, B. Di Eugenio, C. Geib, L. Levison, and M. Moore. 1995. Instructions, intentions and expectations. Artificial Intelligence Journal 73:253-269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. 34.Wilcox, S, K. Web Developer's Guide to 3D Avatars. Wiley, New York, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. 35.XTAG Research Group. 1998. A lexicalized tree adjoining grammar for English. Technical Report, University of Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.Zeltzer, D. 1990. Task-level graphical simulation: Abstraction, representation, and control. In N. Badler, B. Barsky, and D. Zeltzer, eds., Making Them Move: Mechanics, Control, and Animation of Articulated Figures, 3-33. San Francisco, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Dynamically altering agent behaviors using natural language instructions

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              AGENTS '00: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Autonomous agents
              June 2000
              508 pages
              ISBN:1581132301
              DOI:10.1145/336595

              Copyright © 2000 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 June 2000

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate182of599submissions,30%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader