Locke M. Carter
- 1.Bernstein, M. "Patterns of Hypertext." Proceedings of Hypertext '98. Pittsburgh: Association of Computing Machinery, 1998.21-29. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Bolter, J.D. "Topographic Writing: Hypertext and the Electronic Writing Space." Hypermedia and Literary Studies. Ed. Delany, P. & Landow, G. P. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1991. 105-18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Bolter, J.D. Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.Carter, L. Arguments in Hypertext: Order and Structure in Non-Sequential Essays. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas. Ann Arbor, UMI. # AAG 9824882.Google Scholar
- 5.Charney, D. "The Effect of Hypertext on Processes of Reading and Writing." Literacy and Computers: The Complications of Teaching and Learning with Technology. Ed. Cynthia L. Selfe and Susan Hilligoss. New York: Modern Language Association, 1994. 238-63.Google Scholar
- 6.Conklin, J., and Begeman, M.L. "gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Team Design Deliberation." Proceedings of Hypertext '87. Chapel Hill, NC: Association of Computing Machinery, 1987.247-68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Dee-Lucas, D. "Effects of Strategic Overview on Study Strategies and Text Representations for Instructional Hypertext." Hypertext and Cognition. Ed. Rouet, J.F.,et al. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1996.73-107.Google Scholar
- 8.Dillon, A., McKnight, C. & Richardson, J. "Spacethe Final Chapter, or Why Physical Representations are not Semantic Intentions." Hypertext: A Psychological Perspective. Ed. Dillon, A., McKnight, C. & Richardson, J. New York: Horwood, 1993.169-91.Google Scholar
- 9.Fahnestock, J. R., and Secor, M. J. "Teaching Argument: A Theory of Types." College Composition and Communication 34.1 (1983): 20-30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10.Fahnestock, J. R., and Secor, M. J. A Rhetoric of Argument. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.Google Scholar
- 11.Fulkerson, R. "Technical Logic, Comp-Logic, and the Teaching of Writing." College Communication and Composition 39.4 (1988): 436-52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 12.Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Trans. McCarthy, T. Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon, 1984.Google Scholar
- 13.Hamblin, C.L. Fallacies. London: Metheun, 1970.Google Scholar
- 14.Hovland, C. I. The Order of Presentation in Persuasion. New Haven: Yale UP, 1957.Google Scholar
- 15.Johnson, R. H., & Blair, A. J. Introduction. Informal Logic: First International Symposium. Ed. Johnson, R. H., & Blair, A. J. Inverness, CA: Edge, 1978.1-25.Google Scholar
- 16.Kinneavy, J. A Theory of Discourse. New York: Norton, 1980.Google Scholar
- 17.Kolb, D. Socrates in the Labyrinth: Hypertext, Argument, Philosophy. Diskette. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems, 1994.Google Scholar
- 18.Kolb, D. "Scholarly Hypertext: Self-Represented Complexity." Proceedings of Hypertext '97. Southhampton: Association of Computing Machinery, 1997. 247-68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago UP, 1980.Google Scholar
- 20.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago UP, 1989.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 21.Landow, G. P. Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.Landow, G. P. "The Rhetoric of Hypermedia: Some Rules for Authors." Hypermedia and Literary Studies. Ed. Delany, P. & Landow, G. P. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1991.81-104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.Marshall, C.C. and Shipman, F.M. "Searching for the Missing Link: Discovering Implicit Structure in Spatial Hypertext." Proceedings of Hypertext '93. Association of Computing Machinery, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.Nielsen, J. Hypertext and Hypermedia. New York: Academic P, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. The New Rhetoric. Trans. William Kluback. Notre Dame, 1969.Google Scholar
- 26.Rada, R. Hypertext: From Text to Expertext. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.Rieke, R. D., & Stutman, R. K. Communication in Legal Advocacy. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 1990.Google Scholar
- 28.Slatin, J. "Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium." Hypermedia and Literary Studies. Ed. Delany, P. & Landow, G. P. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1991. 153-70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 29.Toulmin, S. E. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1958.Google Scholar
- 30.Trigg, R. "A Network-Based Approach to Text Handling for the Online Scientific Community." Ph.D. thesis, U of Maryland. Ann Arbor: UMI, 1983. #8429934. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 31.Turner, M. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Arguments in hypertext: a rhetorical approach
Recommendations
The revenge of the page
HT '08: Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermediaWriters of literary hypertext have urged complexly linked hypertext forms. Some writers have applied this to expository and argumentative hypertext, taking advantage of hypertext's ability to expand the "margins" of a document in new directions. Where ...
A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements
In this paper we propose rhetoric as a valuable yet underdeveloped alternative paradigm for examining IT diffusion. Building on recent developments of computerization movements theory, our rhetorical approach proposes that two central elements of the ...
Computing Arguments and Attacks in Assumption-Based Argumentation
CaSAPI (Credulous and Skeptical Argumentation: Prolog Implementation) 3.0 determines the acceptability of claims, using the general-purpose framework of assumption-based argumentation, under the semantics of admissible extensions. This framework reduces ...
Comments