skip to main content
10.1145/335603.335775acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Using abstractions for spatio-temporal conceptual modeling

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 March 2000Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Abiteboul, S., and Hull, R., 1987. IFO: A Formal Semantic Database Model. ACM TODS, ! 2(4), pp. 525-565. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Cadastral, 1997. Definition of a Standard for the Exchange of Digital Cadastral Data. National Technical University of Athens funded by CADASTRE SA, Greece.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Castano, S., De Antoneltis, V., and Zonta, B., 1992. Classifying and Reusing Conceptual Schemas. In G. Pernul and A. A. Tjoa, editors, ER92 - Entity-Relationship Approach, LNCS 645, pp. 121-138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Castano, S., and De Antoneilis, V., 1994. Standard-Drive Reengineering of Entity-Relationship Schemas. In P. Loucopoulos, editor, ER'94 - Business Modelling and Re-Engineering, LNCS 881, pp, 566-579. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Chert, P.S., 1976. The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a unified view of Data. ACM TODS, l (1), pp. 9-36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Claramunt, C., Parent, C., and Theriautt, M., 1997. Design Units for Spatiotemporal Processes. IFIP 1997. Chapman and Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Delcambre, L., and Langston, J., 1996. Reusing (Shrink Wrap) Schemas by Modifying Concept Schemas. In Stanley Y. W. Su, editor, Proc. of the t2~'' International Conference on Data Engineering, pp, 326-333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Elmasri, R., and Navarhe, S., 1994. F~mdam~ntats of Database Systems. Benjamin/Cummings. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Fowler, M., 1997. Analysis Units: Reusable Object Models. Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., and Vtissides, l., 1994. Design Units. Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Gordillo, S., Balaguer, F., and Des Neves, F., 1997. Generating the Architecture of GIS Applications with Design Units. Proc, of the 5~h ACM International Symposium on Advances in GI$, pp, 30-34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.lensen, C. S., and Dyreson, C. E., 1998. The Consensus Glossary of Temporal Database Concepts. In Opher Etzion et el. (editors): Temporal Databases: Research and Practice. LNCS 1399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Hay, D. C., 1996. Data Model Units. Dorset House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Hull, R., and King, R., 1987. Semantic Data Modeling: Survey, Applicatior,s and Research Issues. ACM Computing Surveys, 19(3), pp. 201-260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Pree, W., 1994. Design units for Object-Oriented Software Development. Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Rumbaugh, J., Blahs, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., and Lorensen, W. 1991. ObJect-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Snodgrass, R. T., and Ahn, I., 1985. A l~txonomy of Time in Databases. SIGMOD Conference, pp. 236-246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Story, P.A., and Worboys, M.F., 1995. A Design Support Environment for Spatio~Temporat Database Applications. Proc. of the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, LNCS 988, pp. 413-430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Teory, T. J., Guangping, W., Bolton, D., and Koenig, J., 1989. ER Model Clustering as an Aid for User Communication and Documentation in Database Design. Communications of ACM, 32(8), pp. 975-987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Tryfona, N., and Hadzilacos, Th., 1995. Geographic Applications Development: Models and Tools at the Conceptual Level. Proc. of the 3ra ACM International Symposium on Advances in GIS, pp. 19-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Tryfona, N., and Jensen, C. S., 1998. Conceptual Data Modeling for Spatio-Temporal Applications. Geoinformatica ,Ioumal (in press). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.UtilNets, {1994-1997}. Brite-Euram Project 7120, DG XII, European Union, Brussels (completed).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using abstractions for spatio-temporal conceptual modeling

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM symposium on Applied computing - Volume 1
          March 2000
          536 pages
          ISBN:1581132409
          DOI:10.1145/335603

          Copyright © 2000 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 March 2000

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader