ABSTRACT
This study examines whether people would interpret and respond to paralinguistic personality cues in computer-generated speech in the same way as they do human speech. Participants used a book-buying website and heard five book reviews in a 2 (synthesized voice personality: extrovert vs. introvert) by 2 (participant personality: extrovert vs. introvert) balanced, between-subjects experiment. Participants accurately recognized personality cues in TTS and showed strong similarity-attraction effects. Although the content was the same for all participants, when the personality of the computer voice matched their own personality: 1) participants regarded the computer voice as more attractive, credible, and informative; 2) the book review was evaluated more positively; 3) the reviewer was more attractive and credible; and 4) participants were more likely to buy the book. Match of user voice characteristics with TTS had no effect, confirming the social nature of the interaction. We discuss implications for HCI theory and design.
- 1.Beutnagel, M., Conkie, A., Schroeter, J., Stylianou, Y. & Syrdal, A. The A T&T Next-Gen 7TS system. Paper presented at joint meeting of ASA, EAA, and DAGA, Berlin, Germany, March, 1999. {Online} Available at http ://www. research, att. com/proj ects/tts/papers/1999_ ASA_Berlin/nextgen.pdfGoogle Scholar
- 2.Giles, H. & Powesland, P. F. Speech style and social evaluation. Academic Press, London. 1975.Google Scholar
- 3.Hall, J. A. Nonverbal sex differences. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1980.Google Scholar
- 4.Isbister, K. & Nass, C. Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, in press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.James, F. Representing structured information in audio interfaces: A framework for selecting audio marking techniques to represent document structures. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Kamm, C., Walker, M. and Rabiner, L. The role of speech processing in human-computer intelligent communication. Paper presented at NSF Workshop on human-centered systems: Information, interactivity, and intelligence, February, 1997. {Online} Available at http ://www. ifp. uiuc. edu/nsfhcs/talks/rabiner, htmlGoogle Scholar
- 7.Massaro, D. M. Perceiving talking faces." From speech perception to a behavioral principle. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997Google Scholar
- 8.Moon, Y. When the computer is the "salesperson" Computer responses to computer "personalities" in interactive marketing situations. Working paper No. 99-041, Harvard Business School. Boston, MA, 1998.Google Scholar
- 9.Murray, J. B. Review of research on the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70. 1187- 1202, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10.Nass, C. & Gong, L. Maximized modality or constrained consistence? Paper presented at audiovisual speech processing conference, August, 1999.Google Scholar
- 11.Nass, C. & Moon, Y. Machines and mindlessness" Social responses to computers, journal of Social Issues, in press.Google Scholar
- 12.Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C. Can computer personalities be human personalities? International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 43, 223-239, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Olive, J. P. The talking computer: Text to speech synthesis, in D. Stork (ed.) Hal's legacy: 2001's computer as dream and reality. 101-130. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.Google Scholar
- 14.Oren, T., Salomon, G., Kreitman, K., & Don, A. Guides: Characterizing the interface. In B. Laurel (Ed.) The art of human-computer interface design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
- 15.Pittam, J. Voice in social interaction: An interdisciplinary approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.Google Scholar
- 16.Ramsay, R. W. Personality and speech. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 116-118. 1966.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17.Reeves, B. & Nass, C. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.Sawlmey, N. and Schmandt, C. Design of spatialized audio in nomadic environments. Paper presented at the international conference on auditory display (ICAD'97), November, 1997. {Online} Available at http://www.media.mit.eelu/-~nitin/NomadicRadio/ICA D97/ICAD97_paper/iCAD97.htmlGoogle Scholar
- 19.Stmeiderman, B. Designing the user Interface: Strategies for effective HCI (3rd ed.). Addison- Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Smith, B. L., Brown, B.L., Strong, W.J., & Rencher, A.C. Effects of speech rate on personality perceptions. Language and Speech, 18, 145-152, 1975.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 21.Turkle, S., The second self" Computers and ~the human spirit. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY, 1984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.Wheeless, L. R. & Grotz, J. The measurement of trust and its relationship to serf-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 250-257, 1977.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 23.Wiggins, J. S. A psychological taxonomy of traitdescriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395-412, 1979.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 24.Woodall, W. G., & Burgoon, J.K. Talking fast and changing attitudes: A critique and clarification. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 126-142, 1983Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? an experimental test of similarity-attraction
Recommendations
Influence of personality traits on users’ viewing behaviour
Different views on the role of personal factors in moderating individual viewing behaviour exist. This study examined the impact of personality traits on individual viewing behaviour of facial stimulus. A total of 96 students (46 males and 50 females, ...
PIM and personality: what do our personal file systems say about us?
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIndividual differences are prevalent in personal information management (PIM). There is large variation between individuals in how they structure and retrieve information from personal archives. These differences make it hard to develop general PIM ...
Personality and facial expressions in human-robot interaction
HRI '12: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot InteractionThis paper presents the propensities of preference for Human Robot Interaction (HRI) according to different personalities and facial expressions of humans and robots. This study is based on two types of personalities: extroverted and introverted. ...
Comments