skip to main content
10.1145/330560.330665acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

On the expressive power of a language for programming coordination media

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 February 1998Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.F. Arbab, I. Herman, and P. Spilling. An overview of manifold and its implementation. Concurrency: Practice and Experience, 5(1):23-70, 1993.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.J.-P. BanAtre and D. L~ Mdtayer. The Gamma model and its discipline of programming. Science of Computer Programming, 15(1):55-77, November 1990.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.J.-P. Bangtre and D. Le Mdtayer. Programming by multiset transformation. Communications of the A CM, 36(1):98-111, January 1993.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.A. Brogi and P. Ciancaxini. The concurrent language, Shared Prolog. A CM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 13(1), January 1991.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.N. Busi, R. Gorrieri, and O. Zavattaxo. On Turing equivalence of Linda coordination primitives. Technical Report UBLCS-97-5, Laboratory of Computer Science, University of Bologna, May 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.P. Ciancarini. Distributed programming with logic tuple spaces. New Generation Computing, 12, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.P. Ciancarini. Coordination models and languages as software integrators. A CM Computing Surveys, 28(2), June 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.E. Denti, A. Natali, and A. Omicini. Merging logic programming into web-based technology: a coordinationbased approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Logic Programming Tools for lnternet Ap. plications, in conjunction with ICL P '97, pages 117-128, Leuven, Belgium, July 8-12 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.E. Denti, A. Natali, and A. Omicini. Programmable coordination media. In D. Garlan and D. Le M~tayer, editors, Coordination Languages and Models, volume 1282 of LNCS, pages 274-288. Springer-Verlag, 1997. Second International Conference COORDINATION'97, Berlin, Germany, September 1-3, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.E. Denti, A. Natali, A. Omicini, and M. Venuti. An extensible framework for the development of coordinated applications. In P. Ciancarini and C. Hankin, editors, Coordination Languages and Models, volume 1061 of LNCS, pages 305-320. Springer-Verlag, 1996. First International Conference, COORDINATION'96, Cesena, Italy, April 15-17, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.E. Denti, A. Natali, A. Omicini, and M. Venuti. Logic tuple spaces for the coordination of heterogeneous agents. In F. Baader and K.U. Schulz, editors, Frontiers o} Combining Systems, pages 147-160. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. First International Workshop "Frontiers of Combining Systems", FroCoS'96, Munich, Germany, March 26-29, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.E. Denti and A. Omicini. Designing multi-agent systems around an extensible communication abstraction. in A. Cesta and P.-Y. Schobbens, editors, Proceedingt of the gth ModeIAge Workshop on Formal Models oj Agents, Certosa di Pontignano, Italy, January 15-1& 1997, pages 87-97. National Research Council of Italy, 1997. To be published by Springer-Verlag in the LNAI Series.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.E.W. Dijkstra. Co-operating sequentialprocesses. Academic Press, London, 1965.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.D. Gelernter. Generative communication in Linda. A CM Transactions on Programming Languages an( Systems, 7(1), January 1985.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.D. Gelernter. Multiple tuple spaces in Linda. In Pro ceedings of PARLE, volume 365 of LNCS, 1989.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.D. Gelernter and N. Carriero. Coordination language, and their significance. Communications of the A CM 35(2):97-107, February 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.D. Gelernter and L. Zuck. On what linda is: Formal de scription of linda as a reactive system. In D. Garlan an( D. Le M~tayer, editors, Coordination Languages an Models, volume 1282 of LNCS, pages 187-204. Springer Verlag, 1997. Second International Conference COOR DINATION'97, Berlin, Germany, September 1-3, 1997]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.A.A.. Holzbacher. A software environment for concur rent coordinated programming. In P. Ciancarini an~ C. Hankin, editors, Coordination Languages and Moo els, volume 1061 of LNCS, pages 249-266. Springer Verlag, 1996. First International Conference, COOR DINATION'96, Cesena, Italy, April 15-17, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.D.C. Luckham, J.J. Kenney, L.M. Augustin, J. Vera, D. Brian, and W. Mann. Specification and analysis if system architecture using rapide. {EEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(4):336-355, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.M.L. Minsky. Computation: finite and infinite machines. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, 1967.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.N. Minsky and J. Leichter. Law-governed linda as a coordination model. In P. Ciancarini, C. Nierstratsz, and A. Yonezawa, editors, Object-Based Models and Languages, volume 924 of LNCS, pages 125-145. Springer- Verlag, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.A. Omicini, E. Denti, and A. Natali. Agent coordination and control through logic theories. In Topics in Artificial Intelligence- 4th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial intelligence, AI*IA '95, volume 992 of LNAI, pages 439-450, Firenze, Italy, October 11-13 1995. Springer-Verlag.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.G.A. Papadopoulos and F. Arbab. Coordination models and languages. Advances in Computers, 46, 1998. To appear.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.J.C. Shepherdson and H.E. Sturgis. Computability of recursive functions, journal o{ the A CM, 10:217-255, 1963.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.P. Wegner. interactive foundations of computing. Technical report, Brown University, Providence (R{), August 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On the expressive power of a language for programming coordination media

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    SAC '98: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
                    February 1998
                    778 pages
                    ISBN:0897919696
                    DOI:10.1145/330560

                    Copyright © 1998 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 27 February 1998

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • Article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader