skip to main content
10.1145/3358695.3360922acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards an Understanding of Online Extremism in Japan

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Using a large amount of social media data, this study employed a variety of computational methods to investigate online extremism in Japan. In order to explain the increase of online extremism, this study identifies extremists by estimating the ideological position of social media users based on the follower-followee relationship. Following this, this study characterizes the behavioral patterns of such individuals from two perspectives: comparison of profile information and preference in online discussions among different ideological groups.

Computational methods provide many insights into the online extremism in Japan. First, this study finds that although online extremism has been frequently debated about in the recent years, it is somewhat surprising there were a relatively limited number of extremists. Moreover, this study finds that such individuals are more likely to spread information and express their views than moderate users. They particularly exhibit a significant preference to engage in discussions related to political issues or social issues. As a consequence, their behavior and views are more likely to capture a lot of attention and generate influence as a consequence. Taken together, the findings in this study suggest that online extremism in Japan is attributed to the behavioral patterns of extremists, rather than their increasing number.

References

  1. Pablo Barberá. 2015. Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data. Political Analysis 23, 1: 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kathleen M Blee and Kimberly A Creasap. 2010. Conservative and Right-Wing Movements. Annual Review of Sociology 36, 1: 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102602Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. David M. Blei. 2012. Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM 55, 4: 77. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research.3, 4–5: 993–1022. https://doi.org/10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael D Conover, Bruno Gonçalves, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2012. Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data Science 1, 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Caterina Froio and Bharath Ganesh. 2018. The transnationalisation of far right discourse on Twitter: Issues and actors that cross borders in Western European democracies. European Societies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494295Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ivan Kalmar, Christopher Stevens, and Nicholas Worby. 2018. Twitter, Gab, and Racism: The Case of the Soros Myth. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety ’18), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217939Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Philipp Karl. 2017. Hungary's radical right 2.0. Nationalities Papers 45, 3: 345–355. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/00905992.2016.1274967Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kikuko Nagayoshi. 2019. Netto uyoku to wa dare ka-netto uyoku no kiteiyoinn. In Netto uyoku to wa nani ka. seikuisha, Tokyo, 13–43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Margaret E. Roberts, Brandon M. Stewart, Dustin Tingley, and Eduardo M. Airoldi. 2013. The structural topic model and applied social science. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop on Topic Models: Computation, Application, andGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fabian Schäfer, Stefan Evert, and Philipp Heinrich. 2017. Japan's 2014 General Election: Political Bots, Right-Wing Internet Activism, and Prime Minister Shinzō Abe's Hidden Nationalist Agenda. Big Data 5, 4. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2017.0049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Pete Simi and Robert Futrell. 2009. Negotiating White Power Activist Stigma. Social Problems 56, 1: 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.1.89Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Daisuke Tsuji. 2017. A Profile of Netto-uyoku : Quantitative Data Analysis of Online Questionnaire Surveys in 2007 and 2014. Annals of Human Sciences 38: 211–224. https://doi.org/10.18910/60471Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WI '19 Companion: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence - Companion Volume
    October 2019
    326 pages

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate118of178submissions,66%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format