skip to main content
10.1145/3311350.3347178acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Ethereum Crypto-Games: Mechanics, Prevalence, and Gambling Similarities

Published:17 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ethereum crypto-games are a booming and relatively unexplored area of the games industry. While there is no consensus definition yet, 'crypto-games' commonly denotes games that store tokens, e.g. in-game items, on a distributed ledger atop a cryptocurrency network. This enables the trading of game items for cryptocurrency, which can then be exchanged for regular currency. Together with their chance-based mechanics, this makes crypto-games part of the recent convergence of digital gaming and gambling. In a first effort to scope the field, this paper surveys popular crypto-games, which use the Ethereum cryptocurrency, to tease out characteristic technical properties and gameplay. It then compares the games' features with criteria found in current legal and psychological definitions of gambling. We find that the popular crypto-games selected meet a combined legal and psychological definition of gambling, and conclude with ramifications for future research.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p379-scholten.mp4

mp4

113 MB

References

  1. Blizzard Entertainment. 2014. Hearthstone. Game [PC]. (11 March 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Block One. 2018. EOS.IO Technical White Paper v2. (2018). https://github.com/EOSIO/Documentation/blob/ master/TechnicalWhitePaper.mdGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Vitalik Buterin and others. 2014. A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. white paper (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Filipa Calado and Mark D Griffiths. 2016. Problem gambling worldwide: An update and systematic review of empirical research (2000--2015). Journal of behavioral addictions 5, 4 (2016), 592--613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. GyuHyeok Choi and Mijin Kim. 2018. Gameplay of Battle Royale Game by Rules and Actions of Play. In 2018 IEEE 7th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE). IEEE, 599--600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gambling Commission and others. 2017. Virtual currencies, eSports and social casino gaming - Position paper. Gambling Commission, Birmingham, UK (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Aaron Drummond and James D Sauer. 2018. Video game loot boxes are psychologically akin to gambling. Nature Human Behaviour 2, 8 (2018), 530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Epic Games. 2017. Fortnite. Game [PC, Android, PlayStation 4, Nintendo Switch, Xbox One, iOS, PC, Mac]. (July 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingo Fiedler, Sylvia Kairouz, Jean-Michel Costes, and Kristina S Weißmüller. 2019. Gambling spending and its concentration on problem gamblers. Journal of Business Research 98 (2019), 82--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sally M Gainsbury and Alex Blaszczynski. 2017. How blockchain and cryptocurrency technology could revolutionize online gambling. Gaming Law Review 21, 7 (2017), 482--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sally M Gainsbury, Nerilee Hing, Paul H Delfabbro, and Daniel L King. 2014. A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies. International Gambling Studies 14, 2 (2014), 196--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sally M Gainsbury, D King, Brett Abarbanel, Paul H Delfabbro, and Nerilee Hing. 2015. Convergence of gambling and gaming in digital media. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Steven Goldfeder, Harry Kalodner, Dillon Reisman, and Arvind Narayanan. 2018. When the cookie meets the blockchain: Privacy risks of web payments via cryptocurrencies. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2018, 4 (2018), 179--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mark Griffiths. 1995. Adolescent gambling. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mark D Griffiths. 2018. Is the buying of loot boxes in video games a form of gambling or gaming? Gaming Law Review 22, 1 (2018), 52--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Richard Heeks. 2009. Understanding "gold farming" and real-money trading as the intersection of real and virtual economies. Journal For Virtual Worlds Research 2, 4 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrick Hileman and Michel Rauchs. 2017. Global cryptocurrency benchmarking study. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance 33 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yunhui Huang and Zhijie Lin. 2017. Increasing the Sales of Virtual Goods: Leveraging the Numerosity Effect in Virtual Worlds. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mykola Inshyn, Leonid Mohilevskyi, and Oleksii Drozd. 2018. The issue of cryptocurrency legal regulation in Ukraine and all over the world: a comparative analysis. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 4, 1 (2018), 169--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Daniel King, Paul H Delfabbro, and Mark Griffiths. 2010. The convergence of gambling and digital media: Implications for gambling in young people. Journal of Gambling Studies 26, 2 (2010), 175--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Marco Josef Koeder and Ema Tanaka. 2017. Game of chance elements in free-to-play mobile games. A freemium business model monetization tool in need of self-regulation? (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Marco Josef Koeder, Ema Tanaka, and Hitoshi Mitomo. 2018. " Lootboxes" in digital games-A gamble with consumers in need of regulation? An evaluation based on learnings from Japan. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Klaus Krippendorff. 2018. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jan Lansky. 2018. Possible state approaches to cryptocurrencies. Journal of Systems Integration 9, 1 (2018), 19--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Eunjo Lee, Jiyoung Woo, Hyoungshick Kim, and Huy Kang Kim. 2018. No Silk Road for Online Gamers!: Using Social Network Analysis to Unveil Black Markets in Online Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 1825--1834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Vili Lehdonvirta and Edward Castronova. 2014. Virtual economies: Design and analysis. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Joseph Macey and Juho Hamari. 2019. eSports, skins and loot boxes: Participants, practices and problematic behaviour associated with emergent forms of gambling. new media & society 21, 1 (2019), 20--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Satoshi Nakamoto and others. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Arvind Narayanan, Joseph Bonneau, Edward Felten, Andrew Miller, and Steven Goldfeder. 2016. Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Respawn Entertainment. 2019. Apex Legends. Game [PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One]. (February 2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sebastian Schwiddessen and Philipp Karius. 2018. Watch your loot boxes!--Recent developments and legal assessment in selected key jurisdictions from a gambling law perspective. Interactive Entertainment Law Review 1, 1 (2018), 17--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Meng Wang. 2018. Online Games Virtual Products-Transaction and Value. In 2018 International Conference on Management, Economics, Education and Social Sciences (MEESS 2018). Atlantis Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaidong Wu. 2019. An Empirical Study of Blockchain-based Decentralized Applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.04969 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. David Zendle and Paul Cairns. 2018a. Loot box spending in video games is linked to problem gambling severity. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. David Zendle and Paul Cairns. 2018b. Video game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: Results of a large-scale survey. PloS one 13, 11 (2018), e0206767.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. David Zendle, Rachel Meyer, and Harriet Over. 2019a. Adolescents and loot boxes: Links with problem gambling and motivations for purchase. Royal Society Open Science 6, 6 (2019), 190049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. David Zendle, Rachel Meyer, Stuart Waters, and Paul Cairns. 2019b. The prevalence of loot boxes in mobile and desktop games. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Z. Zhang, H. Anada, J. Kawamoto, and K. Sakurai. 2015. Detection of Illegal Players in Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game by Classification Algorithms. In 2015 IEEE 29th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications. 406--413. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2015.214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Ethereum Crypto-Games: Mechanics, Prevalence, and Gambling Similarities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI PLAY '19: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 2019
      680 pages
      ISBN:9781450366885
      DOI:10.1145/3311350

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI PLAY '19 Paper Acceptance Rate51of181submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader