ABSTRACT
The two main tasks addressed by collaborative filtering approaches are rating prediction and ranking. Rating prediction models leverage explicit feedback (e.g. ratings), and aim to estimate the rating a user would assign to an unseen item. In contrast, ranking models leverage implicit feedback (e.g. clicks) in order to provide the user with a personalized ranked list of recommended items. Several previous approaches have been proposed that learn from both explicit and implicit feedback to optimize the task of ranking or rating prediction at the level of recommendation algorithm. Yet we argue that these two tasks are not completely separate, but are part of a unified process: a user first interacts with a set of items and then might decide to provide explicit feedback on a subset of items. We propose to bridge the gap between the tasks of rating prediction and ranking through the use of a novel weak supervision approach that unifies both explicit and implicit feedback datasets. The key aspects of the proposed model is that (1) it is applied at the level of data pre-processing and (2) it increases the representation of less popular items in recommendations while maintaining reasonable recommendation performance. Our experimental results - on six datasets covering different types of heterogeneous user's interactions and using a wide range of evaluation metrics - show that, our proposed approach can effectively combine explicit and implicit feedback and improve the effectiveness of the baseline explicit model on the ranking task by covering a broader range of long-tail items.
- Alejandro Bellogín, Pablo Castells, and Iván Cantador. 2017. Statistical biases in Information Retrieval metrics for recommender systems. Information Retrieval Journal , Vol. 20, 6 (2017), 606--634.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roc'io Ca namares and Pablo . 2018. Should I Follow the Crowd?: A Probabilistic Analysis of the Effectiveness of Popularity in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of SIGIR. 415--424.Google Scholar
- Guy Hadash, Oren Sar Shalom, and Rita Osadchy. 2018. Rank and Rate: Multi-task Learning for Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of RecSys . 451--454.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets. In Proceedings of ICDM . 263--272.Google Scholar
- Yehuda Koren. 2008. Factorization Meets the Neighborhood: A Multifaceted Collaborative Filtering Model. In Proceedings of KDD. 426--434.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yehuda Koren, Robert Bell, and Chris Volinsky. 2009. Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems. Computer , Vol. 42, 8 (2009), 30--37.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gai Li, Zhiqiang Zhang, Liyang Wang, Qiang Chen, and Jincai Pan. 2017. One-class Collaborative Filtering Based on Rating Prediction and Ranking Prediction. Know.-Based Syst. , Vol. 124, C (2017), 46--54.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jian Liu, Chuan Shi, Binbin Hu, Shenghua Liu, and Philip S. Yu. 2017. Personalized Ranking Recommendation via Integrating Multiple Feedbacks. In Proceedings of PAKDD . 131--143.Google Scholar
- Nathan N. Liu, Evan W. Xiang, Min Zhao, and Qiang Yang. 2010. Unifying Explicit and Implicit Feedback for Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of CIKM . 1445--1448.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Babak Loni, Roberto Pagano, Martha Larson, and Alan Hanjalic. 2016. Bayesian Personalized Ranking with Multi-Channel User Feedback. In Proceedings of RecSys . 361--364.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jarana Manotumruksa, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2017a. A Deep Recurrent Collaborative Filtering Framework for Venue Recommendation. In Proceedings of CIKM . 1429--1438.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jarana Manotumruksa, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2017b. A Personalised Ranking Framework with Multiple Sampling Criteria for Venue Recommendation. In Proceedings of CIKM. 1469--1478.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin M. Marlin and Richard S. Zemel. 2009. Collaborative Prediction and Ranking with Non-random Missing Data. In Proceedings of RecSys. 5--12.Google Scholar
- Weike Pan, Nathan N. Liu, Evan W. Xiang, and Qiang Yang. 2011. Transfer Learning to Predict Missing Ratings via Heterogeneous User Feedbacks. In Proceedings of IJCAI. 2318--2323.Google Scholar
- Denis Parra, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Idil Yavuz, and Xavier Amatriain. 2011. Implicit feedback recommendation via implicit-to-explicit ordinal logistic regression mapping. In Proceedings of CARS .Google Scholar
- Apurva Pathak, Kshitiz Gupta, and Julian McAuley. 2017. Generating and Personalizing Bundle Recommendations on Steam. In Proceedings of SIGIR . 1073--1076.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. In Proceedings of UAI . 452--461.Google Scholar
- Yue Shi, Martha Larson, and Alan Hanjalic. 2013. Unifying Rating-oriented and Ranking-oriented Collaborative Filtering for Improved Recommendation. Inf. Sci. , Vol. 229 (2013), 29--39.Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Smith and G. Linden. 2017. Two Decades of Recommender Systems at Amazon.com. IEEE Internet Computing , Vol. 21, 3 (2017), 12--18.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harald Steck. 2010. Training and Testing of Recommender Systems on Data Missing Not at Random. In Proceedings of KDD . 713--722.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harald Steck. 2011. Item Popularity and Recommendation Accuracy. In Proceedings of RecSys. 125--132.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harald Steck. 2013. Evaluation of Recommendations: Rating-prediction and Ranking. In Proceedings of RecSys . 213--220.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mengting Wan and Julian McAuley. 2018. Item Recommendation on Monotonic Behavior Chains. Proceedings of RecSys. 86--94.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hongzhi Yin, Bin Cui, Jing Li, Junjie Yao, and Chen Chen. 2012. Challenging the Long Tail Recommendation. Proc. VLDB Endow. , Vol. 5, 9 (2012), 896--907.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yongfeng Zhang, Qingyao Ai, Xu Chen, and W. Bruce Croft. 2017. Joint Representation Learning for Top-N Recommendation with Heterogeneous Information Sources. In Proceedings of CIKM. 1449--1458.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Unifying Explicit and Implicit Feedback for Rating Prediction and Ranking Recommendation Tasks
Recommendations
Unifying explicit and implicit feedback for collaborative filtering
CIKM '10: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge managementMost collaborative filtering algorithms are based on certain statistical models of user interests built from either explicit feedback (eg: ratings, votes) or implicit feedback (eg: clicks, purchases). Explicit feedbacks are more precise but more ...
Unifying rating-oriented and ranking-oriented collaborative filtering for improved recommendation
We propose a novel unified recommendation model, URM, which combines a rating-oriented collaborative filtering (CF) approach, i.e., probabilistic matrix factorization (PMF), and a ranking-oriented CF approach, i.e., list-wise learning-to-rank with ...
Using Implicit Feedback for Neighbors Selection: Alleviating the Sparsity Problem in Collaborative Recommendation Systems
WebMedia '17: Proceedings of the 23rd Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the WebThe most popular Recommender systems (RSs) employ Collaborative Filtering (CF) algorithms where users explicitly rate items. Based on these ratings, a user-item rating matrix is generated and used to select the items to be recommended for a target user. ...
Comments