skip to main content
10.1145/3341981.3344225acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Unifying Explicit and Implicit Feedback for Rating Prediction and Ranking Recommendation Tasks

Published:26 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The two main tasks addressed by collaborative filtering approaches are rating prediction and ranking. Rating prediction models leverage explicit feedback (e.g. ratings), and aim to estimate the rating a user would assign to an unseen item. In contrast, ranking models leverage implicit feedback (e.g. clicks) in order to provide the user with a personalized ranked list of recommended items. Several previous approaches have been proposed that learn from both explicit and implicit feedback to optimize the task of ranking or rating prediction at the level of recommendation algorithm. Yet we argue that these two tasks are not completely separate, but are part of a unified process: a user first interacts with a set of items and then might decide to provide explicit feedback on a subset of items. We propose to bridge the gap between the tasks of rating prediction and ranking through the use of a novel weak supervision approach that unifies both explicit and implicit feedback datasets. The key aspects of the proposed model is that (1) it is applied at the level of data pre-processing and (2) it increases the representation of less popular items in recommendations while maintaining reasonable recommendation performance. Our experimental results - on six datasets covering different types of heterogeneous user's interactions and using a wide range of evaluation metrics - show that, our proposed approach can effectively combine explicit and implicit feedback and improve the effectiveness of the baseline explicit model on the ranking task by covering a broader range of long-tail items.

References

  1. Alejandro Bellogín, Pablo Castells, and Iván Cantador. 2017. Statistical biases in Information Retrieval metrics for recommender systems. Information Retrieval Journal , Vol. 20, 6 (2017), 606--634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Roc'io Ca namares and Pablo . 2018. Should I Follow the Crowd?: A Probabilistic Analysis of the Effectiveness of Popularity in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of SIGIR. 415--424.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Guy Hadash, Oren Sar Shalom, and Rita Osadchy. 2018. Rank and Rate: Multi-task Learning for Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of RecSys . 451--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets. In Proceedings of ICDM . 263--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yehuda Koren. 2008. Factorization Meets the Neighborhood: A Multifaceted Collaborative Filtering Model. In Proceedings of KDD. 426--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yehuda Koren, Robert Bell, and Chris Volinsky. 2009. Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems. Computer , Vol. 42, 8 (2009), 30--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gai Li, Zhiqiang Zhang, Liyang Wang, Qiang Chen, and Jincai Pan. 2017. One-class Collaborative Filtering Based on Rating Prediction and Ranking Prediction. Know.-Based Syst. , Vol. 124, C (2017), 46--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jian Liu, Chuan Shi, Binbin Hu, Shenghua Liu, and Philip S. Yu. 2017. Personalized Ranking Recommendation via Integrating Multiple Feedbacks. In Proceedings of PAKDD . 131--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nathan N. Liu, Evan W. Xiang, Min Zhao, and Qiang Yang. 2010. Unifying Explicit and Implicit Feedback for Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of CIKM . 1445--1448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Babak Loni, Roberto Pagano, Martha Larson, and Alan Hanjalic. 2016. Bayesian Personalized Ranking with Multi-Channel User Feedback. In Proceedings of RecSys . 361--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jarana Manotumruksa, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2017a. A Deep Recurrent Collaborative Filtering Framework for Venue Recommendation. In Proceedings of CIKM . 1429--1438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jarana Manotumruksa, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2017b. A Personalised Ranking Framework with Multiple Sampling Criteria for Venue Recommendation. In Proceedings of CIKM. 1469--1478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Benjamin M. Marlin and Richard S. Zemel. 2009. Collaborative Prediction and Ranking with Non-random Missing Data. In Proceedings of RecSys. 5--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Weike Pan, Nathan N. Liu, Evan W. Xiang, and Qiang Yang. 2011. Transfer Learning to Predict Missing Ratings via Heterogeneous User Feedbacks. In Proceedings of IJCAI. 2318--2323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Denis Parra, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Idil Yavuz, and Xavier Amatriain. 2011. Implicit feedback recommendation via implicit-to-explicit ordinal logistic regression mapping. In Proceedings of CARS .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Apurva Pathak, Kshitiz Gupta, and Julian McAuley. 2017. Generating and Personalizing Bundle Recommendations on Steam. In Proceedings of SIGIR . 1073--1076.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. In Proceedings of UAI . 452--461.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yue Shi, Martha Larson, and Alan Hanjalic. 2013. Unifying Rating-oriented and Ranking-oriented Collaborative Filtering for Improved Recommendation. Inf. Sci. , Vol. 229 (2013), 29--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. Smith and G. Linden. 2017. Two Decades of Recommender Systems at Amazon.com. IEEE Internet Computing , Vol. 21, 3 (2017), 12--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Harald Steck. 2010. Training and Testing of Recommender Systems on Data Missing Not at Random. In Proceedings of KDD . 713--722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Harald Steck. 2011. Item Popularity and Recommendation Accuracy. In Proceedings of RecSys. 125--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Harald Steck. 2013. Evaluation of Recommendations: Rating-prediction and Ranking. In Proceedings of RecSys . 213--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mengting Wan and Julian McAuley. 2018. Item Recommendation on Monotonic Behavior Chains. Proceedings of RecSys. 86--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hongzhi Yin, Bin Cui, Jing Li, Junjie Yao, and Chen Chen. 2012. Challenging the Long Tail Recommendation. Proc. VLDB Endow. , Vol. 5, 9 (2012), 896--907.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yongfeng Zhang, Qingyao Ai, Xu Chen, and W. Bruce Croft. 2017. Joint Representation Learning for Top-N Recommendation with Heterogeneous Information Sources. In Proceedings of CIKM. 1449--1458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Unifying Explicit and Implicit Feedback for Rating Prediction and Ranking Recommendation Tasks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICTIR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval
      September 2019
      273 pages
      ISBN:9781450368810
      DOI:10.1145/3341981

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICTIR '19 Paper Acceptance Rate20of41submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate209of482submissions,43%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader