skip to main content
10.1145/3341302.3342068acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A millimeter wave network for billions of things

Published:19 August 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the advent of the Internet of Things (IoT), billions of new connected devices will come online, placing a huge strain on today's WiFi and cellular spectrum. This problem will be further exacerbated by the fact that many of these IoT devices are low-power devices that use low-rate modulation schemes and therefore do not use the spectrum efficiently. Millimeter wave (mmWave) technology promises to revolutionize wireless networks and solve spectrum shortage problem through the usage of massive chunks of high-frequency spectrum. However, adapting this technology presents challenges. Past work has addressed challenges in using mmWave for emerging applications, such as 5G, virtual reality and data centers, which require multiple-gigabits-per-second links, while having substantial energy and computing power. In contrast, this paper focuses on designing a mmWave network for low-power, low-cost IoT devices. We address the key challenges that prevent existing mmWave technology from being used for such IoT devices. First, current mmWave radios are power hungry and expensive. Second, mmWave radios use directional antennas to search for the best beam alignment. Existing beam searching techniques are complex and require feedback from access points (AP), which makes them unsuitable for low-power, low-cost IoT devices. We present mmX, a novel mmWave network that addresses existing challenges in exploiting mmWave for IoT devices. We implemented mmX and evaluated it empirically.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p174-mazaheri.mp4

mp4

1.1 GB

References

  1. 2015. 71-76 GHz Millimeter-wave Transceiver System. National Instruments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2018. Introduction to the NI mmWave Transceiver System Hardware. National Instruments. http://www.ni.com/white-paper/53095/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Omid Abari, Dinesh Bharadia, Austin Duffield, and Dina Katabi. 2016. Cutting the cord in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. ACM, 162--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Omid Abari, Dinesh Bharadia, Austin Duffield, and Dina Katabi. 2017. Enabling High-Quality Untethered Virtual Reality. In NSDI. 531--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Omid Abari, Haitham Hassanieh, Michael Rodreguiz, and Dina Katabi. 2016. Poster: A millimeter wave software defined radio platform with phased arrays. In MobiCom. ACM, 419--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Omid Abari, Haitham Hassanieh, Michael Rodriguez, and Dina Katabi. 2016. Millimeter wave communications: From point-to-point links to agile network connections. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. ACM, 169--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Analog Devices {n. d.}. GaAs pHEMT MMIC Power Amplifier, DC - 28 GHz. Analog Devices. v04.0218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Analog Devices {n. d.}. HMC342, GaAs MMIC Low Noise Amplifier, 13-25 GHz. Analog Devices. v01.0907.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Analog Devices {n. d.}. HMC533, MMIC VCO w/Divide-by-16, 23.8-24.8 GHz. Analog Devices. v00.0405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Analog Devices {n. d.}. HMC644A, GaAs MMIC 5-Bit digital phase shifter, 15 - 18.5 GHz. Analog Devices. v00.0516.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Analog Devices {n. d.}. HMC933, 470° Analog Phase shifter, 18 - 24 GHz. Analog Devices. v02.0211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Analog Devices 2017. ADRF5020, 100 MHz to 30 GHz, Silicon SPDT Switch. Analog Devices. Rev. A.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Analog Devices 2017. HMC8191, 6 GHz to 26.5 GHz, Wideband I/Q Mixer. Analog Devices. Rev. B.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Analog Devices 2018. HMC815B, 21 GHz to 27 GHz, GaAs, MMIC, I/Q Upconverter. Analog Devices. Rev. 0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cisco. {n. d.}. Wireless Mesh Constraints. ({n. d.}). https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/technology/mesh/7-3/design/guide/Mesh/Mesh_chapter_011.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tesla Company. {n. d.}. Full Self-Driving Hardware on All Cars. ({n. d.}). https://www.tesla.com/autopilotGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yong Cui, Shihan Xiao, Xin Wang, Zhenjie Yang, Shenghui Yan, Chao Zhu, Xiang-Yang Li, and Ning Ge. 2018. Diamond: Nesting the data center network with wireless rings in 3-d space. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 26, 1 (2018), 145--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mohammed Elbamby, Cristina Perfecto, Mehdi Bennis, and Klaus Doppler. 2018. Toward Low-Latency and Ultra-Reliable Virtual Reality. IEEE Network 32, 2 (2018), 78--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mohammed E Eltayeb, Ahmed Alkhateeb, Robert W Heath, and Tareq Y Al-Naffouri. 2015. Opportunistic beam training with hybrid analog/digital codebooks for mmWave systems. In GlobalSIP. IEEE, 315--319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhen Gao, Linglong Dai, De Mi, Zhaocheng Wang, Muhammad Ali Imran, and Muhammad Zeeshan Shakir. 2015. MmWave massive-MIMO-based wireless backhaul for the 5G ultra-dense network. IEEE Wireless Communications 22, 5 (2015), 13--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Muhammad Kumail Haider and Edward W Knightly. 2016. Mobility resilience and overhead constrained adaptation in directional 60 GHz WLANs: protocol design and system implementation. In MobiHoc. ACM, 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Daniel Halperin, Ben Greenstein, Anmol Sheth, and David Wetherall. 2010. Demystifying 802.11N Power Consumption. In HotPower. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Daniel Halperin, Srikanth Kandula, Jitendra Padhye, Paramvir Bahl, and David Wetherall. 2011. Augmenting data center networks with multi-gigabit wireless links. In SIGCOMM, Vol. 41. ACM, 38--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Haitham Hassanieh, Omid Abari, Michael Rodriguez, Mohammed Abdelghany, Dina Katabi, and Piotr Indyk. 2018. Fast millimeter wave beam alignment. In SIGCOMM. ACM, 432--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Chong He, Xianling Liang, Bin Zhou, Junping Geng, and Ronghong Jin. 2015. Space-division multiple access based on time-modulated array. IEEE Ant. Wireles. Prop. Let. 14 (2015), 610--613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Bin Li, Zheng Zhou, Weixia Zou, Xuebin Sun, and Guanglong Du. 2013. On the efficient beam-forming training for 60GHz wireless personal area networks. IEEE Trans. Wireles. Comm. 12, 2 (2013), 504--515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Robert J Mailloux. 2017. Phased array antenna handbook. Artech house. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Michael Miller. 2015. The internet of things: How smart TVs, smart cars, smart homes, and smart cities are changing the world. Pearson Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Andreas F Molisch, Vishnu V Ratnam, Shengqian Han, Zheda Li, Sinh Le Hong Nguyen, Linsheng Li, and Katsuyuki Haneda. 2017. Hybrid beamforming for massive MIMO: A survey. IEEE Communications Magazine 55, 9 (2017), 134--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Evan Nisselson, Abigail Hunter-Syed, and Sadhana Shah. 2017. 45 billion cameras by 2022 fuel business opportunities. In tech. rep., LDV Capital, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yong Niu, Yong Li, Depeng Jin, Li Su, and Athanasios V Vasilakos. 2015. A survey of millimeter wave communications (mmWave) for 5G: opportunities and challenges. Wireless Networks 21, 8 (2015), 2657--2676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Pasternack. {n. d.}. 60 GHz Development System, Transmit (Tx), Low Phase Noise Development. ({n. d.}). https://www.pasternack.com/60-ghz-development-system-low-phase-noise-pem009-kit-tx-p.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhouyue Pi and Farooq Khan. 2011. An introduction to millimeter-wave mobile broadband systems. IEEE communications magazine 49, 6 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorenzo Poli, Paolo Rocca, Giacomo Oliveri, and Andrea Massa. 2011. Harmonic beamforming in time-modulated linear arrays. IEEE Tran. Ant. Prop. 59, 7 (2011), 2538--2545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Sundeep Rangan, Theodore S Rappaport, and Elza Erkip. 2014. Millimeter-wave cellular wireless networks: Potentials and challenges. Proc. IEEE 102, 3 (2014), 366--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Theodore S Rappaport, Shu Sun, Rimma Mayzus, Hang Zhao, Yaniv Azar, Kevin Wang, George N Wong, Jocelyn K Schulz, Mathew Samimi, and Felix Gutierrez Jr. 2013. Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5G cellular: It will work! IEEE access 1, 1 (2013), 335--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Wonil Roh, Ji-Yun Seol, Jeongho Park, Byunghwan Lee, Jaekon Lee, Yungsoo Kim, Jaeweon Cho, Kyungwhoon Cheun, and Farshid Aryanfar. 2014. Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: theoretical feasibility and prototype results. IEEE Communications Magazine 52, 2 (February 2014), 106--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Swetank Kumar Saha, Yasaman Ghasempour, Muhammad Kumail Haider, Tariq Siddiqui, Paulo De Melo, Neerad Somanchi, Luke Zakrajsek, Arjun Singh, Roshan Shyamsunder, Owen Torres, Daniel Uvaydov, Josep Miquel Jornet, Edward Knightly, Dimitrios Koutsonikolas, Dimitris Pados, and Zhi Sun. 2019. X60: A programmable testbed for wideband 60 ghz wlans with phased arrays. Computer Communications 133 (2019), 77--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Swetank Kumar Saha, Tariq Siddiqui, Dimitrios Koutsonikolas, Adrian Loch, Joerg Widmer, and Ramalingam Sridhar. 2017. A detailed look into power consumption of commodity 60 GHz devices. In WoWMoM. 12--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanjib Sur, Ioannis Pefkianakis, Xinyu Zhang, and Kyu-Han Kim. 2018. Towards Scalable and Ubiquitous Millimeter-Wave Wireless Networks. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, 257--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sanjib Sur, Vignesh Venkateswaran, Xinyu Zhang, and Parmesh Ramanathan. 2015. 60 GHz indoor networking through flexible beams: A link-level profiling. In SIGMETRICS, Vol. 43. ACM, 71--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Sanjib Sur, Xinyu Zhang, Parmesh Ramanathan, and Ranveer Chandra. 2016. BeamSpy: Enabling Robust 60 GHz Links Under Blockage.. In NSDI. 193--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Qinghui Tang, Sandeep KS Gupta, and Loren Schwiebert. 2005. BER performance analysis of an on-off keying based minimum energy coding for energy constrained wireless sensor applications. In IEEE Internat. Conf. Com., Vol. 4. IEEE, 2734--2738.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Y Ming Tsang, Ada SY Poon, and Sateesh Addepalli. 2011. Coding the beams: Improving beamforming training in mmwave communication system. In IEEE GLOBECOM. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. CH Yeh, Yun-Fu Liu, Chi-Wai Chow, Y Liu, PY Huang, and Hon Ki Tsang. 2012. Investigation of 4-ASK modulation with digital filtering to increase 20 times of direct modulation speed of white-light LED visible light communication system. Optics Express 20, 15 (2012), 16218--16223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Wenfang Yuan, Simon MD Armour, and Angela Doufexi. 2015. An efficient and low-complexity beam training technique for mmWave communication. In PIMRC. IEEE, 303--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jialiang Zhang, Xinyu Zhang, Pushkar Kulkarni, and Parameswaran Ramanathan. 2016. OpenMili: a 60 GHz software radio platform with a reconfigurable phased-array antenna. In MobiCom. ACM, 162--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Anfu Zhou, Leilei Wu, Shaoqing Xu, Huadong Ma, Teng Wei, and Xinyu Zhang. 2018. Following the shadow: Agile 3-D beam-steering for 60 GHz wireless networks. In IEEE INFOCOM. IEEE, 2375--2383.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Yibo Zhu, Xia Zhou, Zengbin Zhang, Lin Zhou, Amin Vahdat, Ben Y. Zhao, and Haitao Zheng. 2014. Cutting the Cord: A Robust Wireless Facilities Network for Data Centers. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '14). ACM, 581--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A millimeter wave network for billions of things

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SIGCOMM '19: Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
                August 2019
                526 pages
                ISBN:9781450359566
                DOI:10.1145/3341302

                Copyright © 2019 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 19 August 2019

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader