skip to main content
10.1145/3337722.3337765acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

The trails of Just Cause 2: spatio-temporal player profiling in open-world games

Published:26 August 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Behavioral profiling of players in digital games is a key challenge in game analytics, representing a particular challenge in Open-World Games. These games are characterized by large virtual worlds and few restrictions on player affordances. In these games, incorporating the spatial and temporal dimensions of player behavior is necessary when profiling behavior, as these dimensions are important to the playing experience. We present analyses that apply cluster analysis and the DEDICOM decompositional model to profile the behavior of more than 5,000 players of the major commercial title Just Cause 2 integrating both spatio-temporal trails and behavioral metrics. The application of DEDICOM to profile the spatio-temporal behavior of players is demonstrated for the purpose of analysing the entire play history of Just Cause 2 players, but also for the more detailed analysis of a single mission. This showcases the applicability of spatio-temporal profiling to condense player behavior across large sample sizes, across different scales of investigation. The method presented here provides a means to build profiles of player activity in game environments with high degrees of freedom across different scales of analysis - from a small segment to the entire game.

References

  1. S Aranganayagi and K Thangavel. 2007. Clustering categorical data using silhouette coefficient as a relocating measure. In Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications, 2007. International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 13--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Christian Bauckhage, Anders Drachen, and Rafet Sifa. 2015. Clustering game behavior data. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 7, 3 (2015), 266--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Christian Bauckhage, Rafet Sifa, Anders Drachen, Christian Thurau, and Fabian Hadiji. 2014. Beyond heatmaps: Spatio-temporal clustering using behavior-based partitioning of game levels. In Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), 2014 IEEE conference on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. John Bohannon. 2010. Game-miners grapple with massive data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alessandro Canossa, Anders Drachen, and Janus Rau Møller Sørensen. 2011. Arrrgghh!!!: blending quantitative and qualitative methods to detect player frustration. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on foundations of digital games. ACM, 61--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Peter A Chew, Brett W Bader, and Alla Rozovskaya. 2009. Using DEDICOM for completely unsupervised part-of-speech tagging. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Unsupervised and Minimally Supervised Learning of Lexical Semantics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 54--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Olivier Delalleau, Emile Contal, Eric Thibodeau-Laufer, Raul Chandias Ferrari, Yoshua Bengio, and Frank Zhang. 2012. Beyond skill rating: Advanced match-making in ghost recon online. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 4, 3 (2012), 167--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Anders Drachen, Alessandro Canossa, and Georgios N Yannakakis. 2009. Player modeling using self-organization in Tomb Raider: Underworld. In Computational Intelligence and Games, 2009. CIG 2009. IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Anders Drachen and Matthias Schubert. 2013. Spatial game analytics. In Game Analytics. Springer, 365--402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Anders Drachen, Rafet Sifa, Christian Bauckhage, and Christian Thurau. 2012. Guns, swords and data: Clustering of player behavior in computer games in the wild. In Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), 2012 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 163--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Anders Drachen, Christian Thurau, Rafet Sifa, and Christian Bauckhage. 2014. A comparison of methods for player clustering via behavioral telemetry. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.3950 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Anders Drachen, Matthew Yancey, John Maguire, Derrek Chu, Iris Yuhui Wang, Tobias Mahlmann, Matthias Schubert, and Diego Klabajan. 2014. Skill-based differences in spatio-temporal team behaviour in defence of the ancients 2 (dota 2). In 2014 IEEE Games Media Entertainment. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Christoph Eggert, Marc Herrlich, Jan Smeddinck, and Rainer Malaka. 2015. Classification of player roles in the team-based multi-player game dota 2. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Springer, 112--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Magy Seif El-Nasr, Anders Drachen, and Alessandro Canossa. 2016. Game analytics. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu-chang Feng, David Brandt, and Debanjan Saha. 2007. A long-term study of a popular MMORPG. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Network and System Support for Games. ACM, 19--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tim Fields and Brandon Cotton. 2011. Social game design: Monetization methods and mechanics. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Richard A Harshman. 1978. Models for analysis of asymmetrical relationships among N objects or stimuli. In First Joint Meeting of the Psychometric Society and the Society of Mathematical Psychology, Hamilton, Ontario, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Humphreys G. Hoobler, N. and M. Agrawala. 2004. Visualizing competitive behaviors in multi-user virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization. 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jun H Kim, Daniel V Gunn, Eric Schuh, Bruce Phillips, Randy J Pagulayan, and Dennis Wixon. 2008. Tracking real-time user experience (TRUE): a comprehensive instrumentation solution for complex systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 443--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Larry Mellon. 2009. Applying metrics driven development to MMO costs and risks. Versant Corporation (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. John L Miller and Jon Crowcroft. 2010. Group movement in world of warcraft battlegrounds. International Journal of Advanced Media and Communication 4, 4 (2010), 387--404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pejman Mirza-Babaei, Günter Wallner, Graham McAllister, and Lennart E Nacke. 2014. Unified visualization of quantitative and qualitative playtesting data. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1363--1368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Truong-Huy D Nguyen, Magy Seif El-Nasr, and Alessandro Canossa. 2015. Glyph: Visualization Tool for Understanding Problem Solving Strategies in Puzzle Games.. In FDG.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Dmitry Nozhnin. 2012. Predicting churn: When do veterans quit. Gamasutra, August 30th (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Johanna Pirker, Simone Griesmayr, Anders Drachen, and Rafet Sifa. 2016. How playstyles evolve: progression analysis and profiling in just cause 2. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Springer, 90--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. François Rioult, Jean-Philippe Métivier, Boris Helleu, Nicolas Scelles, and Christophe Durand. 2014. Mining tracks of competitive video games. AASRI Procedia 8 (2014), 82--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Peter J Rousseeuw. 1987. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of computational and applied mathematics 20 (1987), 53--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rafet Sifa, Anders Drachen, and Christian Bauckhage. 2018. Profiling in Games: Understanding Behavior from Telemetry. Social Interactions in Virtual Worlds: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rafet Sifa, Anders Drachen, Christian Bauckhage, Christian Thurau, and Alessandro Canossa. 2013. Behavior evolution in tomb raider underworld. In Computational Intelligence in Games (CIG), 2013 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Rafet Sifa, Anders Drachen, and Christian Bauckhauge. 2018. Profiling in Games: Understanding Behavior from Telemetry. In Social Interaction in Virtual Worlds. 337--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rafet Sifa, César Ojeda, and Christian Bauckhage. 2015. User churn migration analysis with DEDICOM. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 321--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rafet Sifa, Sridev Srikanth, Anders Drachen, Cesar Ojeda, and Christian Bauckhage. 2016. Predicting retention in sandbox games with tensor factorization-based representation learning. In Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), 2016 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Christian Thurau, Kristian Kersting, and Christian Bauckhage. 2009. Convex non-negative matrix factorization in the wild. In Data Mining, 2009. ICDM'09. Ninth IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 523--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Robert Tibshirani, Guenther Walther, and Trevor Hastie. 2001. Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 63, 2 (2001), 411--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Giel Van Lankveld, Pieter Spronck, Jaap Van den Herik, and Arnoud Arntz. 2011. Games as personality profiling tools. In Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), 2011 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 197--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Marin Vukovic, Ignac Lovrek, and Hrvoje Kraljevic. 2012. Discovering shoppers' journey in retail environment by using RFID.. In KES. 857--866.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Günter Wallner and Simone Kriglstein. 2014. PLATO: A visual analytics system for gameplay data. Computers & Graphics 38 (2014), 341--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Geogios N Yannakakis. 2012. Game AI revisited. In Proceedings of the 9th conference on Computing Frontiers. ACM, 285--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Georgios N Yannakakis and Julian Togelius. 2015. A panorama of artificial and computational intelligence in games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 7, 4 (2015), 317--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The trails of Just Cause 2: spatio-temporal player profiling in open-world games

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        FDG '19: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
        August 2019
        822 pages
        ISBN:9781450372176
        DOI:10.1145/3337722

        Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 August 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        FDG '19 Paper Acceptance Rate46of124submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate152of415submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader