skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

Embedded EthiCS: integrating ethics across CS education

Published:24 July 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A Harvard-based pilot program integrates class sessions on ethical reasoning into courses throughout its computer science curriculum.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S. and Kirchner, L. Machine Bias. (May 2016). Retrieved Oct. 13, 2018; https://bit.ly/1XMKh5R.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barocas, S. and Nissenbaum, H. Big data's end run around procedural protections. Commun. ACM 57, 11 (Nov. 2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barocas, S. and Selbst, A. Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review 104, 671 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton, E. Goldsmith, J. and Mattei, N. How to teach computer ethics through science fiction. Commun. ACM 61, 8 (Aug. 2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Califf, M.E. and Goodwin, M. 2005. Effective incorporation of ethics into courses that focus on programming. In Proceedings of the 36<sup>th</sup> SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (St. Louis, MO, 2015) ACM Press, New York, NY 347--351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cech, E.A. Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, & Human Values 39, 1 (2014), 42--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dwork, C. Differential privacy. Automata, Languages and Programming, M. Bugliesi, B. Preneel, V. Sassone, and I. Wegener, (eds) Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4052 (2006). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Economist. Do social media threaten democracy? (Nov. 2017). Retrieved Oct. 13, 2018; https://econ.st/2xf31GL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hellman, D. When is Discrimination Wrong? Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hollander, R. and Arenberg, C.R. (eds.). Ethics Education and Scientific and Engineering Research: What's Been Learned? What Should Be Done? Summary of a Workshop, National Academy of Engineering. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S. and Raghavan, M. Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores (2016), arXiv:1609.05807Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight, W. Biased algorithms are everywhere, and no one seems to care. Technology Review, (July 2017). Retrieved Oct. 13, 2018 from https://bit.ly/2tIhlEX.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Levin, S. Uber crash shows 'catastrophic failure' of self-driving technology, experts say. The Guardian (Mar. 2018); https://bit.ly/2pych2k.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Levy, K. and Barocas, S. Refractive surveillance: Monitoring customers to manage workers. Intern. J. Commun. 12 (2018), 1166--1188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lohr, S. Facial recognition is accurate if you're a white guy. New York Times (Feb. 2018); https://nyti.ms/2H3QeaT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mill, J.S. On Liberty. Parker and Son, London, U.K., 1859.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. New York Times Editorial Board. Facebook and the digital virus called fake news. (Nov. 2016); https://nyti.ms/2vIMC9Y.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pease, A. and Baker, R. Union College's Rapaport Everyday Ethics Across the Curriculum Initiative. Teaching Ethics, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice, Belknap, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Rumbold, B. and Wilson, J. Privacy rights and public information. J. Political Philosophy, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Scanlon, TM. The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Skirpan, M., Beard, N., Bhaduri, S., Fiesler, C. and Yeh, T. Ethics education in context: A case study of novel ethics activities for the CS classroom. In Proceedings of the 49<sup>th</sup> ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Baltimore, MD, 2018). ACM Press, New York, NY, 940--945 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sweeney, L. Uniqueness of simple demographics in the U.S. population. LIDAP-WP4, 2000. Carnegie Mellon University, Laboratory for International Data Privacy, Pittsburgh, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tasioulas, J. The moral reality of human rights. Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor? T. Pogge, (ed). Oxford University Press, co-Published with UNESCO, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wasserman, D., Asch, A., Blustein, J. and Putnam, D. Disability: Definitions, models, experience. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition). Retrieved July 19, 2018 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/disability/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Embedded EthiCS: integrating ethics across CS education

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      Chaim M Scheff

      Motivated by a plethora of exemplary "intelligent" information enterprises, this article presents results related to Embedded EthiCS, "a Harvard-based pilot program [that] integrates class sessions on ethical reasoning into courses throughout its computer science curriculum." Example multidisciplinary elective courses include "Privacy and Technology" and "Intelligent Systems: Design and Ethical Challenges." The authors observe: Some technologies are thought to threaten democracy through the spread of propaganda on online social networks, or to threaten privacy through the aggregation of datasets that include increasingly personal information, or to threaten justice when machine learning is used in such high-stakes, decision-making contexts as loan application reviews, employment procedures, or parole hearings. Accordingly, 14 modules are described, including "Networks: Facebook, Fake News, and the Ethics of Censorship," "Design of Useful and Usable Interactive Systems: Inclusive Design and Equality of Opportunity," and "Machine Learning: Machine Learning and Discrimination." Harvard's magnificent curriculum advancement, which converges courses in ethics with courses in computer science (CS), recreates the disposition of earlier generations, when students of technology were expected to be well read in philosophy, history, the arts, and (of course) ethics. Nevertheless, there is neither evidence for nor proof of the belief that knowledge of such literature produces more ethical technocrats. Rather, it would seem more progressive to converge training groups and psychotherapy with applied science and CS studies to produce technicians and decision makers who are more likely to abhor draconian systems proposals and their potentially horrific anti-human implementation consequences. Once fashionable, albeit now apparently forgotten, academic technology ethics discussions (post World War I and post-Holocaust) pondered how so many highly educated scientists and engineers could have created such scales of barbaric death and destruction, without substantial individual protests or sabotage. Recall a triple-step ballroom dance called the cha-cha, characterized by repeating intervals of two steps forward and one step back. Perhaps, Harvard will take the second step forward to enable its now literature-literate students to mature by fostering their improved mental/moral health in addition to laudatory external exposures to Embedded EthiCS.

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Communications of the ACM
        Communications of the ACM  Volume 62, Issue 8
        August 2019
        88 pages
        ISSN:0001-0782
        EISSN:1557-7317
        DOI:10.1145/3351434
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 July 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Popular
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format