skip to main content
10.1145/3307334.3326107acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

MagTrack: Enabling Safe Driving Monitoring with Wearable Magnetics

Published:12 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

"Hands on the wheel, eyes on the road" is the central guideline of safe vehicle driving practices. Many advanced driver assistance systems can effectively detect abnormal vehicle motions. However, these systems often leave insufficient time for drivers to respond to complex road situations, especially when the drivers are distracted. To reduce accidents, it is essential to detect whether a driver complies with safe driving guidelines in real time and provide warnings early before any dangerous maneuvers occur. There are vision-based driver distraction monitoring systems which rely on cameras in high-end vehicles, but their performances are heavily constrained by visibility requirements. In this paper, we present MagTrack, a driver monitoring system that is based on tracking magnetic tags worn by the user. With a single smartwatch and two low-cost magnetic accessories: a hand magnetic ring and a head magnetic eyeglasses clip, our system tracks and classifies a driver's bimanual and head movements simultaneously using both analytical and approximation sensing models. Our approach is robust to driver's postures, vehicles, and environmental changes. We demonstrate that a wide range of activities can be detected by our system, including bimanual steering, visual and manual distractions, and lane changes and turns. In extensive road tests with 500+ instances of driving activities and 500+ minutes of road driving with 10 subjects, MagTrack achieves 87% of precision and 90% of recall rate on the detection of unsafe driving activities.

References

  1. N. Aksan, L. Sager, S Hacker, Marini R., Dawson J., Anderson S., and Rizzo M. 2016. Forward Collision Warning: Clues to Optimal Timing of Advisory Warnings. In SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nawal Alioua, Aouatif Amine, Alexandrina Rogozan, Abdelaziz Bensrhair, and Mohammed Rziza. 2016. Driver head pose estimation using efficient descriptor fusion. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, Vol. 2016, 1 (2016), 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Amazon. 2019. Driver Alertness System. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NAQOVF6/ref=psdc_7459508011_t1_B004F2OEEM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Takashi Aoki, Jonathan Feng-Shun Lin, Dana Kulić, and Gentiane Venture. 2016. Segmentation of human upper body movement using multiple IMU sensors. In 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 3163--3166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Frederick J Berg, Timothy J Bennett, Alan C Davis, Richard K Riefe, Ronald H Dybalski, and Timothy M Phillips. 2007. Steering system with haptic driver warning. US Patent 7,280,046.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chongguang Bi, Jun Huang, Guoliang Xing, Landu Jiang, Xue Liu, and Minghua Chen. 2017. SafeWatch: A Wearable Hand Motion Tracking System for Improving Driving Safety. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 223--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. BioStamp. 2019. BioStamp Wearables Health Monitoring. https://www.mc10inc.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dongyao Chen, Kyong-Tak Cho, Sihui Han, Zhizhuo Jin, and Kang G. Shin. 2015. Invisible Sensing of Vehicle Steering with Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ke-Yu Chen, Kent Lyons, Sean White, and Shwetak Patel. 2013. uTrack: 3D input using two magnetic sensors. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 237--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ke-Yu Chen, Rahul C Shah, Jonathan Huang, and Lama Nachman. 2017. Mago: Mode of Transport Inference Using the Hall-Effect Magnetic Sensor and Accelerometer. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 1, 2 (2017), 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chihwen Cheng, Xueliang Huo, and Maysam Ghovanloo. 2009. Towards a magnetic localization system for 3-D tracking of tongue movements in speech-language therapy. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE. IEEE, 563--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. In-Ho Choi, Chan-Hee Jeong, and Yong-Guk Kim. 2016. Tracking a driver's face against extreme head poses and inference of drowsiness using a hidden Markov model. Applied Sciences, Vol. 6, 5 (2016), 137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ashraf Darwish and Aboul Ella Hassanien. 2011. Wearable and implantable wireless sensor network solutions for healthcare monitoring. Sensors, Vol. 11, 6 (2011), 5561--5595.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kamal El Farouki, Emmanuel Lagarde, Ludivine Orriols, Manuel-Pierre Bouvard, Benjamin Contrand, and Cédric Galéra. 2014. The increased risk of road crashes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) adult drivers: driven by distraction? Results from a responsibility case-control study. PLoS one, Vol. 9, 12 (2014), e115002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Aydin Farajidavar, Jacob M Block, and Maysam Ghovanloo. 2012. A comprehensive method for magnetic sensor calibration: A precise system for 3-D tracking of the tongue movements. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE. IEEE, 1153--1156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Firehouse. 2019. Fire Technology. https://www.firehouse.com/ tech- comm/ mobile- technology- accessories/ article/ 21000640/ wearable- technology- for- firefighters.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Center for Disease Control. 2019. Distracted Driving Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/distracted _driving.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pia M Forsman, Bryan J Vila, Robert A Short, Christopher G Mott, and Hans PA Van Dongen. 2013. Efficient driver drowsiness detection at moderate levels of drowsiness. Accident Analysis & Prevention (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Valerie Galluzzi, Ted Herman, and Philip Polgreen. 2015. Hand Hygiene Duration and Technique Recognition Using Wrist-worn Sensors. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 106--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mostafa Haghi, Kerstin Thurow, and Regina Stoll. 2017. Wearable devices in medical internet of things: scientific research and commercially available devices. Healthcare informatics research, Vol. 23, 1 (2017), 4--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Brett O Hall. 2001. Collision avoidance system. US Patent 6,223,125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Xinying Han, Hiroaki Seki, Yoshitsugu Kamiya, and Masatoshi Hikizu. 2010. Wearable handwriting input device using magnetic field: 2nd report: Influence of misalignment of magnet and writing plane. Precision Engineering, Vol. 34, 3 (2010), 425--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mark A Hanson, Harry C Powell Jr, Adam T Barth, Kyle Ringgenberg, Benton H Calhoun, James H Aylor, and John Lach. 2009. Body area sensor networks: Challenges and opportunities. Computer, Vol. 42, 1 (2009), 58--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Qichang He, Wei Li, Xiumin Fan, and Zhimin Fei. 2016. Evaluation of driver fatigue with multi-indicators based on artificial neural network. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, Vol. 10, 8 (2016), 555--561.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kasthuri Jayarajah, Vigneshwaran Subbaraju, Noel Athaide, Lakmal Meeghapola, Andrew Tan, and Archan Misra. 2018. Can multimodal sensing detect and localize transient events?. In Ground/Air Multisensor Interoperability, Integration, and Networking for Persistent ISR IX, Vol. 10635. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 106351A.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Qiang Ji and Xiaojie Yang. 2002. Real-time eye, gaze, and face pose tracking for monitoring driver vigilance. Real-Time Imaging, Vol. 8, 5 (2002), 357--377. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Haojian Jin, Zhijian Yang, Swarun Kumar, and Jason I Hong. 2018. Towards wearable everyday body-frame tracking using passive rfids. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 1, 4 (2018), 145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Derick A Johnson and Mohan M Trivedi. 2011. Driving style recognition using a smartphone as a sensor platform. In Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 1609--1615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Philip W Kithil, Roger D Jones, and John McCuish. 2001. Driver alertness detection research using capacitive sensor array . Technical Report. SAE Technical Paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Klic. 2019. Klic Wearables. (2019). https://www.klik.co/en/wearables.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. T. J. Kline. 2007. Using Efficient Steering Techniques. Journal of traffic safety education, Vol. 55, 1 (2007), 14--16, 22. http://dx.doi.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Dong-Min Lee. 2001. Method for detecting lane deviation of vehicle. US Patent 6,317,057.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. John Lee, Daniel McGehee, Timothy Brown, and Michelle L Reyes. 2002. Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator. Human factors (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Youngki Lee, Chulhong Min, Chanyou Hwang, Jaeung Lee, Inseok Hwang, Younghyun Ju, Chungkuk Yoo, Miri Moon, Uichin Lee, and Junehwa Song. 2013. Sociophone: Everyday face-to-face interaction monitoring platform using multi-phone sensor fusion. In Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 375--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kun Li, Man Lu, Fenglong Lu, Qin Lv, Li Shang, and Dragan Maksimovic. 2012. Personalized driving behavior monitoring and analysis for emerging hybrid vehicles. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing . Springer, 1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. BOTTOM LINE. 2012. Get with the times: You're driving all wrong . https://www.nbcnews.com/businessmain/get-times-youre-driving-all-wrong-518710/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Luyang Liu, Hongyu Li, Jian Liu, Cagdas Karatas, Yan Wang, Marco Gruteser, Yingying Chen, and Richard P Martin. 2017. Bigroad: Scaling road data acquisition for dependable self-driving. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 371--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Maven Machine. 2019. Maven co-pilot. https://mavenmachines.com/maven-co-pilot.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Chinmay Manohar, James A Levine, Debashis K Nandy, Ahmed Saad, Chiara Dalla Man, Shelly K McCrady-Spitzer, Rita Basu, Claudio Cobelli, Rickey E Carter, Ananda Basu, et almbox. 2012. The effect of walking on postprandial glycemic excursion in patients with type 1 diabetes and healthy people. Diabetes Care, Vol. 35, 12 (2012), 2493--2499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Uwe Maurer, Asim Smailagic, Daniel P Siewiorek, and Michael Deisher. 2006. Activity recognition and monitoring using multiple sensors on different body positions . Technical Report. Carnegie-Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. mboxState Farm Insurance. 2017. Things Have Changed Since You Learned to Drive . https://www.statefarm.com/simple-insights/auto-and-vehicles/things-have-changed-since-you-learned-to-drive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. mboxTexas Driver Training Division, Texas Driver License Division. 2016. Behind-the-Wheel Instruction Guide .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. John McDonald. 18--7--2006. Rotation About an Arbitrary Axis. In CGEMS - Computer Graphics Educational Materials, (Ed.). The Eurographics Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Summit Medical. 2019. Wrist Injury Recovery Exercises. https://www.summitmedicalgroup.com/library/adult_health/sma_wrist_tendonitis_exercises/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Wei Mei, Gan-Lin Shan, and X Rong Li. 2007. Simultaneous tracking and classification: a modularized scheme. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, Vol. 43, 2 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Michael I Miller, Anuj Srivastava, and Ulf Grenander. 1995. Conditional-mean estimation via jump-diffusion processes in multiple target tracking/recognition. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 43, 11 (1995), 2678--2690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Erik Murphy-Chutorian and Mohan Manubhai Trivedi. 2010. Head pose estimation and augmented reality tracking: An integrated system and evaluation for monitoring driver awareness. IEEE Transactions on intelligent transportation systems, Vol. 11, 2 (2010), 300--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Phuc Nguyen, Hieu Nguyen, Dong Nguyen, Thang N Dinh, Hung M La, and Tam Vu. 2017. ParkSense: automatic parking positioning by leveraging in-vehicle magnetic field variation. IEEE Access, Vol. 5 (2017), 25021--25033.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. OptAlert. 2019. OptAlert. https://www.optalert.com/explore-products/scientifically-validated-glasses-mining.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Jean Christophe Popieul, Philippe Simon, and Pierre Loslever. 2003. Using driver's head movements evolution as a drowsiness indicator. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE. IEEE, 616--621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Progressive. 2019. Snapshot Driving Monitor. https://www.progressive.com/auto/discounts/snapshot/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Valentin Radu, Catherine Tong, Sourav Bhattacharya, Nicholas D Lane, Cecilia Mascolo, Mahesh K Marina, and Fahim Kawsar. 2018. Multimodal deep learning for activity and context recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 1, 4 (2018), 157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Sasank Reddy, Min Mun, Jeff Burke, Deborah Estrin, Mark Hansen, and Mani Srivastava. 2010. Using mobile phones to determine transportation modes. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), Vol. 6, 2 (2010), 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Consumer Reports. 2019. How To Track Teen Driver. https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2014/07/how-to-track-your-teen-driver/index.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. David Sandberg and Mattias Wahde. 2008. Particle swarm optimization of feedforward neural networks for the detection of drowsy driving. In Neural Networks, 2008. IJCNN 2008.(IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence). IEEE International Joint Conference on. IEEE, 788--793.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Sougata Sen, Vigneshwaran Subbaraju, Archan Misra, Rajesh Krishna Balan, and Youngki Lee. 2015. The case for smartwatch-based diet monitoring. In 2015 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communication workshops (PerCom workshops). IEEE, 585--590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Santokh Singh. 2015. Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the national motor vehicle crash causation survey . Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Alexander V Smirnov, Alexey Kashevnik, Igor Lashkov, Olesya Baraniuc, and Vladimir Parfenov. 2016. Smartphone-based identification of dangerous driving situations: Algorithms and implementation.. In FRUCT. 306--313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Eleuthère Stathopoulos, V Schlageter, B Meyrat, Y Ribaupierre, and P Kucera. 2005. Magnetic pill tracking: a novel non-invasive tool for investigation of human digestive motility. Neurogastroenterology & Motility, Vol. 17, 1 (2005), 148--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Maria Staubach. 2009. Factors correlated with traffic accidents as a basis for evaluating Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, 5 (2009), 1025--1033.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Smartcap Technology. 2019. Smart Cap. http://www.smartcaptech.com/life-smart-cap.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Simone Verheij, Danya Muilwijk, Johan J.M. Pel, Tischa J.M. van der Cammen, Francesco U.S. Mattace-Raso, and Johannes van der Steen. 2012. Visuomotor Impairment in Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: Changes in Relative Timing of Eye and Hand Movements. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, Vol. 30, 1 (2012), 131--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Vigo. 2019. Vigo. https://www.wearvigo.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Vitalacy. 2019. Hand Washing Monitoring. (2019). http://www.hyginex.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Esra Vural, Mujdat Cetin, Aytul Ercil, Gwen Littlewort, Marian Bartlett, and Javier Movellan. 2007. Drowsy driver detection through facial movement analysis. Human-computer interaction (2007), 6--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Eric A Wan and Rudolph Van Der Merwe. 2000. The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. In Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium 2000. AS-SPCC. The IEEE 2000. Ieee, 153--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Yanxin Wang, Johnny Wong, and Andrew Miner. 2004. Anomaly intrusion detection using one class SVM. In Proceedings from the Fifth Annual IEEE SMC Information Assurance Workshop, 2004. IEEE, 358--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Wikipedia. 2019 a. Kalman Filtering Basics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalman_filter##Details.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Wikipedia. 2019 b. Maximum Likelihood Parameter Estimation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_likelihood_estimation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Jie Wu, Kun Li, Yifei Jiang, Qin Lv, Li Shang, and Yihe Sun. 2011. Large-scale battery system development and user-specific driving behavior analysis for emerging electric-drive vehicles. Energies, Vol. 4, 5 (2011), 758--779.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Minglin Wu, Sheng Zhang, and Yuhan Dong. 2016. A novel model-based driving behavior recognition system using motion sensors. Sensors, Vol. 16, 10 (2016), 1746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Chuang-Wen You, Nicholas D. Lane, Fanglin Chen, Rui Wang, Zhenyu Chen, Thomas J. Bao, Martha Montes-de Oca, Yuting Cheng, Mu Lin, Lorenzo Torresani, and Andrew T. Campbell. 2013. CarSafe App: Alerting Drowsy and Distracted Drivers Using Dual Cameras on Smartphones. In Proceeding of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Jiadi Yu, Zhongyang Chen, Yanmin Zhu, Yingying Jennifer Chen, Linghe Kong, and Minglu Li. 2017. Fine-grained abnormal driving behaviors detection and identification with smartphones. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 16, 8 (2017), 2198--2212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Jiadi Yu, Hongzi Zhu, Haofu Han, Yingying Jennifer Chen, Jie Yang, Yanmin Zhu, Zhongyang Chen, Guangtao Xue, and Minglu Li. 2016. Senspeed: Sensing driving conditions to estimate vehicle speed in urban environments. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 15, 1 (2016), 202--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. ZDNet. 2019. Wearable Cameras for the Police. https://www.zdnet.com/article/22000-london-police-are-getting-wearable-cameras-to-video-crime.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Chiara Zecchin, Andrea Facchinetti, Giovanni Sparacino, Chiara Dalla Man, Chinmay Manohar, James A Levine, Ananda Basu, Yogish C Kudva, and Claudio Cobelli. 2013. Physical activity measured by physical activity monitoring system correlates with glucose trends reconstructed from continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes technology & therapeutics, Vol. 15, 10 (2013), 836--844.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. MagTrack: Enabling Safe Driving Monitoring with Wearable Magnetics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiSys '19: Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services
      June 2019
      736 pages
      ISBN:9781450366618
      DOI:10.1145/3307334

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 June 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate274of1,679submissions,16%

      Upcoming Conference

      MOBISYS '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader