skip to main content
10.1145/3322385.3322393acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Attracting Young IT Professionals: An Empirical Study Using the Theory of Attractive Quality

Published:12 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Attracting and recruiting qualified information technology (IT) professionals remains one key issue for executives for numerous years. The so-called war for IT talent illustrates the hard competition of employers for well-educated IT professionals who develop and advance future technologies. Thus, employers are required to court the young professionals' attention to recruit the best of them. Previous research lists certain attractiveness attributes but leaves their interrelations open. We therefore evaluate established attractiveness attributes referring to the Theory of Attractive Quality. To answer the research question? What attracts young IT professionals to an employer?' we conduct an empirical study surveying 223 young IT professionals and evaluate 24 attractiveness attributes that employers should or even need to provide in order to recruit young IT professionals.

References

  1. Ritu Agarwal and Thomas W. Ferratt. 2001. Crafting an HR strategy to meet the need for IT workers. Commun. ACM 44, 7, 58--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ritu Agarwal and Thomas W. Ferratt. 2002. Enduring practices for managing IT professionals. Commun. ACM 45, 9, 73--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ritu Agarwal, Thomas W. Ferratt, and Prabuddha De. 2007. An experimental investigation of turnover intentions among new entrants in it. SIGMIS Database 38, 1, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Manju K. Ahuja, Katherine M. Chudoba, Charles J. Kacmar, D. H. McKnight, and Joey F. George. 2007. ICT Road Warriors: Balancing Work-Family Conflict, Job Autonomy, and Work Overload to Mitigate Turnover Intentions. MIS Quarterly 31, 1, 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tim Ambler and Simon Barrow. 1996. The employer brand. J Brand Manag 4, 3, 185--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Soon Ang, Sandra Slaughter, and Kok Yee Ng. 2002. Human Capital and Institutional Determinants of Information Technology Compensation. Modeling Multilevel and Cross-Level Interactions. Management Science 48, 11, 1427--1445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Deborah J. Armstrong, Cynthia K. Riemenschneider, Myria W. Allen, and Margaret F. Reid. 2007. Advancement, voluntary turnover and women in IT. A cognitive study of work--family conflict. Information & Management 44, 2, 142--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Berger, R. Blauth, D. Boger, C. Bolster, G. Burchill, W. DuMouchel, F. Pouliot, R. Richter, A. Rubinoff, D. Shen, M. Timko, and D. Walden. 1993. Kano'sMethods for Understanding Customer-Defined Quality. The Center for Quality Management Journal 2, 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pierre Berthon, Michael Ewing, and Li L. Hah. 2005. Captivating company. Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International Journal of Advertising 24, 2, 151--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Daniel Cable and Daniel Turban. 2001. Establishing the Dimensions, Sources and Value of Job Seekers' Employer Knowledge During Recruitment 20, 115--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. CEDEFOP, Ed. 2016. Skill Shortage and Surplus Occupations in Europe: Cedefop insights into which occupationsare in high demand -- and why. Briefing Note - 9115 EN, Thessaloniki, Greece.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Christina L.-H. Chang, Victor Chen, Gary Klein, and James J. Jiang. 2011. Information system personnel career anchor changes leading to career changes. Eur J Inf Syst 20, 1, 103--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Christopher J. Collins and Cynthia K. Stevens. 2002. The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants: a brand equity approach to recruitment. The Journal of applied psychology 87, 6, 1121--1133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Crispin R. Coombs. 2009. Improving retention strategies for IT professionals working in the public sector. Information & Management 46, 4, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. D. Couger and R. O'Callaghan. 1994. Comparing the motivations of Spanish and Finnish computer personnel with those of the United States. Eur J Inf Syst 3, 4, 285--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Michael Dinger, Jason B. Thatcher, Darren Treadway, Lee Stepina, and Jacob Breland. 2015. Does Professionalism Matter in the IT Workforce? An Empirical Examination of IT Professionals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16, 4, 281--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Andreas Eckhardt, Sven Laumer, Christian Maier, and Tim Weitzel. 2016. The effect of personality on IT personnel's job-related attitudes. Establishing a dispositional model of turnover intention across IT job types. J Inf Technol 31, 1, 48--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Thomas W. Ferratt, Ritu Agarwal, Carol V. Brown, and Jo E. Moore. 2005. IT Human Resource Management Configurations and IT Turnover. Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Analysis. Information Systems Research 16, 3, 237--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Thomas W. Ferratt, Jayesh Prasad, and Harvey G. Enns. 2012. Synergy and Its Limits in Managing Information Technology Professionals. Information Systems Research 23, 4, 1175--1194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Florentine. 2016. How to win the war for IT talent (2016). Retrieved from https://www.cio.com/article/3024948/hiring/how-to-win-the-war-for-it-talent.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Fong. 1996. Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpret Kano questionnaire results. The Center for Quality Management Journal 5, 3, 21--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Indira R. Guzman, Kathryn R. Stam, and Jeffrey M. Stanton. 2008. The occupational culture of IS/IT personnel within organizations. SIGMIS Database 39, 1, 33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Indira R. Guzman and Jeffrey M. Stanton. 2009. IT occupational culture. The cultural fit and commitment of new information technologists. Info Technology & People 22, 2, 157--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Nathan Heinze and Qing Hu. 2009. Why college undergraduates choose IT. A multi-theoretical perspective. Eur J Inf Syst 18, 5, 462--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Frederick Herzberg, Bernard Mausner, and Barbara B. Snyderman. 1959. The motivation to work (2. ed.). Wiley; Chapman & Hall, New York, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Magid Igbaria and Tor Guimaraes. 1993. Antecedents and Consequences of Job Satisfaction among Information Center Employees. Journal of Management Information Systems 9, 4, 145--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. James J. Jiang and Gary Klein. 1999. Supervisor Support and Career Anchor Impact on the Career Satisfaction of the Entry-Level Information Systems Professional. Journal of Management Information Systems 16, 3, 219--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. K. G. Jin and Ronald G. Drozdenko. 2010. Relationships among Perceived Organizational Core Values, Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Performance Outcomes. An Empirical Study of Information Technology Professionals. J Bus Ethics 92, 3, 341--359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Damien Joseph, Soon Ang, Roger H. L. Chang, and Sandra A. Slaughter. 2010. Practical intelligence in IT. Commun. ACM 53, 2, 149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. N. Kano, N. Seraku, F. Takahashi, and S. Tsuji. 1984. Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 14, 39--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Leon Kappelman, Ephraim McLean, Vess Johnson, Russell. Torres, Quynh Nguyen, Chris Maurer, and Alsius David. 2018. The 2017 SIM IT Issues and Trends Study. MIS Quarterly Executive 17, 1, 53--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. M. Kavitha and P. T. Srinivasan. 2012. The Relationship between Employer Image and Organizational Attractiveness in the Information Technology Industry. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management 7, 2, 11--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Youngsoo Kim, Ramayya Krishnan, and Linda Argote. 2012. The Learning Curve of IT Knowledge Workers in a Computing Call Center. Information Systems Research 23, 3-part-2, 887--902. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ruth C. King, Weidong Xia, James Campbell Quick, and Vikram Sethi. 2005. Socialization and organizational outcomes of information technology professionals. Career Dev Int 10, 1, 26--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. G. Z. Lan, Lera Riley, and N. J. Cayer. 2005. How Can Local Government Become an Employer of Choice for Technical Professionals? Lessons and Experiences From the City of Phoenix. Review of Public Personnel Administration 25, 3, 225--242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sven Laumer, Andreas Eckhardt, and Tim Weitzel. 2010. Electronic Human Resources Management in an E-Business Environment. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 11, 4, 240--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. M. C. Lee and J. Newcomb. 1997. Applying the Kano methodology to meet customer requirements: NASA's microgravity science program. Quality Management Journal 4, 3, 95--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Natalia Levina and Mingdi Xin. 2007. Research Note-Comparing IT Workers' Compensation Across Country Contexts. Demographic, Human Capital, and Institutional Factors. Information Systems Research 18, 2, 193--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Filip Lievens and Scott Highhouse. 2003. The Relation of Instrumental and Symbolic Attributes to a Company's Attractiveness as an Employer. Personnel Psychology 56, 1, 75--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Martin Löfgren and Lars Witell. 2005. Kano's Theory of Attractive Quality and Packaging. Quality Management Journal 12, 3, 7--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Paul B. Lowry, Gregory D. Moody, James Gaskin, Dennis F. Galletta, Sean L. Humpherys, Jordan B. Barlow, and David W. Wilson. 2013. Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars' Journal Basket Via Bibliometric Measures. Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value? MIS Quarterly 37, 4, 993--1012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Frank MacCrory, Vidyanand Choudhary, and Alain Pinsonneault. 2016. Research Note-Designing Promotion Ladders to Mitigate Turnover of IT Professionals. Information Systems Research 27, 3, 648--660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Debra A. Major, Valerie J. Morganson, and Heather M. Bolen. 2013. Predictors of Occupational and Organizational Commitment in Information Technology: Exploring Gender Differences and Similarities. Journal of Business and Psychology 28, 3, 301--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Makoto Matsuo, Christina W.Y. Wong, and Kee-hung Lai. 2008. Experience-based learning of Japanese IT professionals. A qualitative research. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17, 3, 202--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Kurt Matzler and Hans H. Hinterhuber. 1998. How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 18, 1, 25--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. D. H. McKnight, Brandis Phillips, and Bill C. Hardgrave. 2009. Which reduces IT turnover intention the most. Workplace characteristics or job characteristics? Information & Management 46, 3, 167--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. John P. Murray. 1999. Successfully Hiring and Retaining it Personnel. Information Systems Management 16, 2, 18--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Lars Nilsson-Witell and Anders Fundin. 2005. Dynamics of service attributes. A test of Kano's theory of attractive quality. Int J of Service Industry Mgmt 16, 2, 152--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Raymond R. Panko. 2008. IT employment prospects. Beyond the dotcom bubble. Eur J Inf Syst 17, 3, 182--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Margaret F. Reid, Myria W. Allen, Deborah J. Armstrong, and Cynthia K. Riemenschneider. 2010. Perspectives on challenges facing women in IS. The cognitive gender gap. Eur J Inf Syst 19, 5, 526--539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Albert B. Schwarzkopf, Roberto J. Mejias, 'Jon Jasperson, Carol S. Saunders, and Hermann Gruenwald. 2004. Effective practices for IT skills staffing. Commun. ACM 47, 1, 83--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Eileen M. Trauth, Jeria L. Quesenberry, and Haiyan Huang. 2009. Retaining women in the U.S. IT workforce. Theorizing the influence of organizational factors. Eur J Inf Syst 18, 5, 476--497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Andranik Tumasjan, Maria Strobel, and Isabell M. Welpe. 2011. Employer brand building for start-ups. Which job attributes do employees value most? Z Betriebswirtsch 81, S6, 111--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Jane Webster and Richard T. Watson. 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly 26, 2, xiii--xxiii. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Tim Weitzel, Andreas Eckhardt, and Sven Laumer. 2009. A Framework for Recruiting IT Talent: Lessons from Siemens. MIS Quarterly Executive 8, 4, 175--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Lars Witell, Martin Löfgren, and Jens J. Dahlgaard. 2013. Theory of attractive quality and the Kano methodology -- the past, the present, and the future. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 24, 11--12, 1241--1252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGMIS-CPR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Computers and People Research Conference
    June 2019
    211 pages
    ISBN:9781450360883
    DOI:10.1145/3322385

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 June 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGMIS-CPR '19 Paper Acceptance Rate20of30submissions,67%Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader